Stephen P. Becker wrote: > Brian Harring wrote: >> The proper forum for crap like this is via taking it up with QA/devrel. >> >> Screaming about a change on the ml doesn't accomplish anything more >> then making you look like a jack ass trying to publically embarass >> someone you're pissed at; at least carlo has a reason, stephen you're >> just being an asshole. > > Yes, I am, because it pisses me off when people outright break things > because they had no clue what they were doing. Furthermore, he did > break mips with that change, so that makes it my business to whip out > the cluestick. My previous email was intended to show that he doesn't > seem to have any idea what he was doing.
I wonder how exactly genstef broke mips, 'cos mind you, he just reverted to what the ebuild was doing before Bug 114161 was fixed by hard-disabling of hspell [1]. Since mips doesn't have hspell keyworded, it wasn't affected by that bug before it's been fixed and it wasn't affected after the bug has been reintroduced now [2] (Additionally there shouldn't be any problem now except for one called automagic dependencies since the blocker for incompatible versions was there). [1] http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/kde-base/kdelibs/kdelibs-3.5.0.ebuild?hideattic=0&r1=1.4&r2=1.5 [2] http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/kde-base/kdelibs/kdelibs-3.5.4-r1.ebuild?r1=1.3&r2=1.4 So, how exactly is this public bitching useful? -- Best regards, Jakub Moc mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG signature: http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E ... still no signature ;)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
