Carsten Lohrke wrote: > One question remains: Is it needed/correct that Portage doesn't take blockers > for architecture breakages into account? Such a line/prefix is easily changed > and when someone - whatever the bad reason is - uses cvs commit, a real tree > breakage is the cause.
The behaviour is correct. The depstring in question was "!<app-text/hunspell-1.0", which means that you can't have <hunspell-1.0 and kdelibs installed on a system at the same time. Reason for this could e.g. be file collisions that got fixed in hunspell-1.0. If the depstring was "!<app-text/hunspell-1.0 app-text/hunspell", (same as ">=app-text/hunspell-1.0", just retarded) repoman would complain loudly. -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
