Hi,
2c from a silent reader, present since jspwiki entered incubator: as this
task is specific to ASF, and the project hasn't entered / engaged with
ASF/incubator yet, wouldn't this task better be performed by the member
championing the request? This person most probably has already helped with
th
Yes. I suppose the champion CAN do the job. But I'm yet to find a good
sentence to convey this intention.
Best,
tison.
Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez 于2025年4月17日周四
19:36写道：
> Hi,
>
> 2c from a silent reader, present since jspwiki entered incubator: as this
> task is specific to ASF, and the proje
Back in September Craig Russell made a proposal on this list to adopt a new
vote format for podlings [1]:
> I'm proposing that for votes, that a standard form be used for
> registering and tallying votes. For registering votes, include
> the ASF id in the vote line, e.g.
>
> +1 clr (IPMC)
>
> For
On Sat, Sep 7, 2024 at 3:30 PM Christofer Dutz
wrote:
> ...Pro-tip from a freshly former board member: Many TLPs would consider
> that interfering with their freedom to do wtftw ...
That's if you wanted to make this a requirement, which I don't think
it's needed.
Presenting it as a best practice
gt;> I'd say establishing this for new projects based on reasoning during
>> incubation is going to be a lot less conflict loaded.
>>
>> Chris
>>
>> Gesendet von Outlook für Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
>>
; Gesendet von Outlook für Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
>
> From: PJ Fanning
> Sent: Saturday, September 7, 2024 2:20:19 PM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Proposal: Recording votes in podlings
>
> Sounds like a good idea to me and may be usefu
tember 7, 2024 3:40:39 AM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Proposal: Recording votes in podlings
>
> +1 Sounds like a good idea to me.
>
> Thanks,
> Xin
>
>
> Nathan Hartman 于2024年9月7日 周六09:15写道：
>
> > On Fri, Sep 6, 2024 at 5:30 PM Craig Russell
Absolutely
+1 cdutz (IPMC)
from my side :-)
Gesendet von Outlook für Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
From: Xin Wang
Sent: Saturday, September 7, 2024 3:40:39 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Proposal: Recording votes in podlings
+1 Sound
On Sat, 7 Sept 2024 at 01:58, John D. Ament wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2024 at 5:30 PM Craig Russell wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd like to discuss (again) how to register podling votes for new
> > committers, PPMC members, and releases.
> >
> > People often have many names, most of which do not mat
HI Craig,
This is a good idea, and would save the secretary time when checking an account
request. Having a parsable email saves a large amount of time.
Where do you plan to document this prescription?
Best,
Dave
> On Sep 6, 2024, at 2:29 PM, Craig Russell wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to dis
+1， LGTM
On Sat, Sep 7, 2024 at 8:41 AM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 It sounds like a good idea to me.
>
> Justin
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: g
Hi,
+1 It sounds like a good idea to me.
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
; -Original Message-
> From: larry mccay
> Sent: Monday, October 24, 2022 4:41 PM
> To: d...@livy.apache.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Proposal to Revive Apache Livy Community
>
> Again, I have no objections to this and will be happy to include you.
> Thanks for call
Great, I'll move that forward.
That sounds like a NOTICE thread?
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 4:16 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Usually, the PPMC would need to vote on adding new PPMC members, but it
> seems Livy no longer has 3 active PPMC members. The chair of the project
> can add PMC member
Hi,
Usually, the PPMC would need to vote on adding new PPMC members, but it seems
Livy no longer has 3 active PPMC members. The chair of the project can add PMC
members. But PPMC members only have standing in the Incubator, so I would guess
(as it isn’t documented) that any IPMC could add those
Oh, very good, Alex!
Be sure to let us know if you want to remain on the project in any capacity.
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 3:18 PM Alex Bozarth wrote:
> As the only Livy PPMC still responding to the Mentors on the private list,
> I have updated the Livy Podling report for November with the statu
As the only Livy PPMC still responding to the Mentors on the private list, I
have updated the Livy Podling report for November with the status of the
project and a request to the IPMC to review this proposal since there are not
enough active Livy PPMC members to reach a quorum to pass the propos
Gentle reminder that we need to determine next steps here.
We have an updated proposal on this thread.
Do we need a VOTE or can we move forward directly to adjusting the members,
etc?
Thanks!
--larry
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 3:26 PM larry mccay wrote:
> @Justin Mclean - any insights on next st
@Justin Mclean - any insights on next steps here?
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 5:44 PM larry mccay wrote:
> Very good, here is the latest revision with updated Mentors.
> Sunil and I have been added to the IPMC as well.
> Welcome Madhawa and thanks for stepping up as a Mentor for Livy!
>
> Abstract
Very good, here is the latest revision with updated Mentors.
Sunil and I have been added to the IPMC as well.
Welcome Madhawa and thanks for stepping up as a Mentor for Livy!
Abstract
Livy is a web service that exposes a REST interface for managing long
running Apache Spark contexts in your clust
Hi Larry,
I'm an IPMC Member. madhawa30 at gmail dot com is my preferred email
address.
apache id: madhawa
Thanks,
Madhawa
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 10:05 PM larry mccay wrote:
> Hi Madhawa -
>
> That's awesome!
> Are you already a member of IPMC?
> If not, are you an ASF member?
> If you are
Hi,
Madhawa is an IPMC member.
Kind Regards,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Hi Madhawa -
That's awesome!
Are you already a member of IPMC?
If not, are you an ASF member?
If you are an ASF member you can request that you be added as an IPMC
member.
Can you provide your company affiliation for the proposal and preferred
email?
thanks!
--larry
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 2:1
Hi Larry,
I'm interested in working with Livy and would like to join as a Mentor.
Thanks,
Madhawa
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 6:57 PM larry mccay wrote:
> Sorry, I missed commenting on this:
>
> "There is also no concept as an emeritus PPMC member at the ASF."
>
> I assume that we can remove PPMC
Sorry, I missed commenting on this:
"There is also no concept as an emeritus PPMC member at the ASF."
I assume that we can remove PPMC members that do not opt-in explicitly at
this point.
They will have every opportunity to rejoin.
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 12:48 PM larry mccay wrote:
> I will a
I will ask in a separate thread, @Justin Mclean -
thanks.
Adding JB adds another company and we are certainly open to anyone else
that would like to join as a mentor.
At the end of the day, the mentors are for instilling the Apache Way
knowledge and steering toward graduation.
I feel that this div
Hi,
I’m sorry, but Imran Rashid can’t be a mentor for the project as they are not
an IPMC member. Currently, both Sunil and Larry (as they are ASF members) need
to ask to join the IPMC and NOTICE sent to the ASF board. I would also prefer
that mentors come from different companies.
There is al
Revised Proposal with opt-out for committers and JB as a mentor which adds
more diversity to the company based mentors.
These were items suggested on this thread. Thanks again, Justin!
Abstract
Livy is a web service that exposes a REST interface for managing long
running Apache Spark contexts in y
Hi Larry,
thanks for this !
I'm still interested to work on Livy. Can you please add me as mentor ?
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 8:38 PM larry mccay wrote:
>
> Abstract
>
> Livy is a web service that exposes a REST interface for managing long
> running Apache Spark contexts in y
Awesome - thanks, Justin!
On Sat, Oct 15, 2022, 11:51 AM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The project is free to choose RTC or RTC. I just wanted to check if it was
> considered. I’ve seen in some cases, CTR tends to put a lot of work onto
> existing committers and cause frustration when contribut
Hi,
The project is free to choose RTC or RTC. I just wanted to check if it was
considered. I’ve seen in some cases, CTR tends to put a lot of work onto
existing committers and cause frustration when contributions are not reviewed
in a timely way.
Another thing to consider is what someone would
Hi Justin -
Thanks for the feedback.
I can buy all of that other than the dev practices suggestion.
The project originally used RTC as per the original proposal and being a
more mature podling, I don't think we need to move that fast.
With new committers, it will also be good to ensure others are
Hi,
A couple of things stand out here to me:
- Your mentors need to be IPMC members.
- It would be helpful to include mentors who are not all affiliated with one
company
- It would be helpful to know what the existing PMC and the wider community
think about this reboot. It may be there’s no one
+d...@livy.incubator.apache.org
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 2:38 PM larry mccay wrote:
> Abstract
>
> Livy is a web service that exposes a REST interface for managing long
> running Apache Spark contexts in your cluster. With Livy, new applications
> can be built on top of Apache Spark that requir
Hi,
Le ven. 20 mai 2022 à 00:33, m sacks a écrit :
>
> And if i want to publish it without building community just publish to
> github if i understand correctly?...
You can do that, and if you have plans to join the ASF later it's
useful to take a look at [1] and ideally shape your emerging comm
Cool.
On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 3:37 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> yep... pretty much
>
> On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 6:33 PM m sacks wrote:
> >
> > And if i want to publish it without building community just publish to
> github if i understand correctly?
> >
> >
> > On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 3:22 PM Cle
yep... pretty much
On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 6:33 PM m sacks wrote:
>
> And if i want to publish it without building community just publish to github
> if i understand correctly?
>
>
> On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 3:22 PM Clebert Suconic
> wrote:
>>
>> if you widen your focus from the chatbot to a mo
And if i want to publish it without building community just publish to
github if i understand correctly?
On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 3:22 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> if you widen your focus from the chatbot to a more opened approach
> (e.g. Artificial Intelligence transformations, etc... ) you wou
if you widen your focus from the chatbot to a more opened approach
(e.g. Artificial Intelligence transformations, etc... ) you would
have a better chance of building community... on that case your
Leonardo da Vinci could be part of the bigger scope project as an
example of an implementation, while
[1], which is an Apache License 2.0 product. But I also expect most
> people on this list would like to see what is proposed and discussed in the
> open.
>
>
>
> [1] https://github.com/kingoflolz/mesh-transformer-jax/
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *m sacks
> *D
/
From: m sacks
Date: Wednesday, May 18, 2022 at 5:58 PM
To: Daniel Widdis ,
Subject: Re: Proposal
So I’m not sure if this made it either: is there at least one person interested
in collaborating on this project it involves GPT three?
On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 10:47 PM m sacks wrote:
Not
So I’m not sure if this made it either: is there at least one person
interested in collaborating on this project it involves GPT three?
On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 10:47 PM m sacks wrote:
> Not sure if this made it:
> Just a term of endearment, mot taken to be meant literally.
>
> Sure.
>
> Initiall
I agree, but I think we need to give some more concrete guidance how to
develop an open community and develop in the open, because although it
is clear to ASF people, I think it is often not so clear for many other
people
@msacks: Did you already have a look at
https://incubator.apache.org/co
Develop an open community and develop in the open. If the community starts to
grow then come back and ask for guidance in how to make your open source
community an ASF community.
Did I mention open and community enough?
All the best,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 16, 2022, at 10:47 PM, m
Not sure if this made it:
Just a term of endearment, mot taken to be meant literally.
Sure.
Initially the community would be a private group put together by me.
Then we can discuss building it once others have decided if it’s even a
useful application first?
On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 10:20 PM Dan
I'm not an ASF warlord or general. In fact, I don't think such things exist.
It's about community. Decisions are made by communities. Warlords, generals,
and benevolent dictators don't fit well.
Related, I don't see anything "community" in your post. You state "I" have got
code, not "we".
Y
Hi,
Kammi’s summary is very comprehensive, try to open source first. and
you'd better find an experienced mentor to help you, it will be very
helpful ! Good luck
Best Regards
---
DolphinScheduler(Incubator) PPMC
Lidong Dai
dailidon...@gmail.com
---
On Sun, Feb 28, 20
Hi,
My +1 for the suggestions and summary from Furkan KAMACI.
They are truly many IPMC concerns, I guess.
Some of the items will need you plenty of time to handle,
I am unsure whether it is the best time for you to propose now.
But, at least I suppose you have a direction to improve.
Sincerely
n yannian mu
f...@lucene.cn yannian mu
From: Ming Wen
Date: 2021-02-28 21:18
To: general
Subject: Re: Re: [Proposal] lxdb - proposal for Apache Incubation
Hi, fp,
Your email is hard to read.
Please change to a normal mail client first.
Back to your proposal, the key concern is not technol
>
> project, or a wrapper of other projects which eliminates the shortcomings
>
>
>
> of them.
>
>
>
> 6) Find a suitable name for your project in order to not try to solve
>
>
>
> trademark problems that may lose your time if you enter the incubation.
&
ne.cn yannian mu
From: Furkan KAMACI
Date: 2021-02-28 18:51
To: general
Subject: Re: [Proposal] lxdb - proposal for Apache Incubation
Hi,
Actually you have a detailed documentation which explains which approach
you have compared to similar systems and performance metri
ub.com/lucene-cn/lxhadoop
我后来想到的一个思路就是将parquet的格式替换到lucene的倒排与正排上,这样我既能进行多条件的全文检索,在检索的时候parquet多列的特性又能让我通过高效的遍历倒排表来规避随机读的性能问题
f...@lucene.cn yannian mu
From: Liang Chen
Date: 2021-02-28 18:02
To: general
Subject: Re: [Proposal] lxdb - proposal for Apache Incubat
Hi,
Actually you have a detailed documentation which explains which approach
you have compared to similar systems and performance metrics of following
them i.e. reducing storage 10 to the 100 times or having low latency
queries.
My advices are (some of them are same with Sheng's and Liang's ):
1
Hi
It would be better if you could find an experienced IPMC member to help you
for preparing the proposal.
Based on Sheng Wu input, i have one more comment : can you please explain
what are the different with other similar data analysis DB? you can
consider explaining from use cases perspective.
che member or officer) to help you understand the incubator.
> Can you help me? I really have language problems. There is less
> communication in this area. I have done a lot of sharing in China before. I
> hope you can help me if you can.If you like this project, you can also join
>
oject, you can also join
> us. It's a very good opportunity in China's database market
> my telnum is 17099831107
>
>
>
>
>
>
> yannian mu 母延年
> luxin,muyannian
>
>
>
>
> -- 原始邮件 --
> 发件人:
> "
Hi
Since you are proposing a new project to a global foundation, you should at
least keep your documentation in English. Your provided links are Chinese,
which for most IPMC people, it is not readable.
And since this project is close-source, please provide the dependencies.
And as you repeated sai
Welcome, Liang! Thank you for offering to help. Now we have enough mentors.
Liang Chen 于2020年6月10日周三 下午10:46写道：
> Hi Tao Wu
>
> I am willing to be a mentor. I am familiar with big data , can give some
> help for incubating.
>
>
> Regards
> Liang
>
> Justin Mclean wrote
> > Hi,
> >
> >> Thank you
Hi Tao Wu
I am willing to be a mentor. I am familiar with big data , can give some
help for incubating.
Regards
Liang
Justin Mclean wrote
> Hi,
>
>> Thank you for your interest, Kevin. Since now we have 2 mentors, shall we
>> call for a vote?
>
> Given Kevin said he only 1/2 mentor it would b
Hi,
> Thank you for your interest, Kevin. Since now we have 2 mentors, shall we
> call for a vote?
Given Kevin said he only 1/2 mentor it would be preferable if you had one more
mentor. Anyone willing to help out?
Thanks,
Justin
--
Thank you for your interest, Kevin. Since now we have 2 mentors, shall we
call for a vote?
@Gosling Von
Kevin A. McGrail 于2020年6月10日周三 上午2:41写道：
> While I am honored to be asked, I am mentoring actively a number of
> projects right now with another one being proposed.
> Please count me as a men
While I am honored to be asked, I am mentoring actively a number of
projects right now with another one being proposed.
Please count me as a mentor but seek out others and consider me in reality
to be a 1/2 a mentor :-)
--
Kevin A. McGrail
Member, Apache Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache S
Hi,
The ASF allows 3rd party code to be included in releases. It wouldn’t be part
of the grant and still remain the original headers and copyright. The ASF also
doesn’t fork other communities code, but given this is unmaintained and no
longer in active development [1] from what I can see I don
Sure, Sheng. We certainly don't want to steal any IP from anyone. Sorry if
I didn't make it clear.
My question is, are we legal enough to paste copyright of Microsoft on
every file that originates from them, as we always do? As far as I know, it
suffices to prevent legal problems.
But I'm not fam
Since MIT is compatible with Apache 2.0 so I do not think this is a blocker
issue? We can even bundle the rdsn code into the pegasus main repository I
think.
We can solve this problem during the incubating time.
Of course it will be good if microsoft would like to donate the code.
Sheng Wu 于2020年
吴涛 于2020年6月8日周一 下午5:22写道：
> Hi, Willem,
>
> This is the historical issue we are going to resolve recently.
>
> We've reduced the incompatible modifications on facebook/rocksdb [1] where
> pegasus-rocksdb was forked, and I believe we will soon no longer need to
> maintain
> this repo. It will be c
Hi, Willem,
This is the historical issue we are going to resolve recently.
We've reduced the incompatible modifications on facebook/rocksdb [1] where
pegasus-rocksdb was forked, and I believe we will soon no longer need to
maintain
this repo. It will be completely used as an external dependency.
Thanks, Kevin. I'd very much appreciate it if you can become one of our mentors.
Regards
Tao.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Hi,
I just went through the proposal and found there are two source code
repos[1][2] which are forked.
Are you planning to donate these two repos into Apache as a part of
Pegasus project?
It makes the donation of the Pegasus complicated as we need to address
this two code repo belonging issue fir
This looks very interesting. I've used Redis a long time and Pegasus looks
very interesting.
I'd like to see a champion and some mentors but otherwise I really like
what I see here.
Regards,
KAM
--
Kevin A. McGrail
Member, Apache Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
htt
posal to
start the journey to become Apache HBlock.
Best wishes.
Guochen.
-邮件原件-
发件人:
general-return-73210-zhangguochen=chinatelecom...@incubator.apache.org
代
表 Justin Mclean
发送时间: 2020年5月24日 17:00
收件人: general@incubator.apache.org
主题: Re: [Proposal]New storage project: HBlock
Hi,
Hi,
Just checking in on progress here and where this proposal is at.
Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On 3/25/2020 5:39 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 1:56 PM Kevin A. McGrail
> wrote:
>
>> I have committed to champion and I think the points you make are good,
>> Ted. Do you have the bandwidth to be a mentor?
>>
> I don't have the time.
>
> I am interested in the project, but
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 1:56 PM Kevin A. McGrail
wrote:
> I have committed to champion and I think the points you make are good,
> Ted. Do you have the bandwidth to be a mentor?
>
I don't have the time.
I am interested in the project, but just can't afford the time and effort
for mentoring a
I have committed to champion and I think the points you make are good,
Ted. Do you have the bandwidth to be a mentor?
I will work with them to set expectations about the process. I have also
asked for them to do some community building now, too.
--
Kevin A. McGrail
Member, Apache Software Found
Three things are very clear to me:
1) having an open source iSCSI implementation from a mature and experienced
storage stream is a very cool thing, especially if it can be targeted to
non HDFS storage relatively easily. Building such a thing requires very
high levels of experience and expertise th
On 3/9/20 10:45 PM, Sheng Wu wrote:
Hi
Personally, and basically, I am feeling the team has misunderstood
the meaning of incubator and the requirements of building the community.
Same as the last time discussion, I still think they will be in a big
pressure as they have to deal with the basic
Hi
Personally, and basically, I am feeling the team has misunderstood
the meaning of incubator and the requirements of building the community.
Same as the last time discussion, I still think they will be in a big
pressure as they have to deal with the basic feature development, community
build and
A big thanks to all that have left feedback! After much deliberation, we
have decided to withdraw this proposal for the time being. The questions
around licenses are delicate, and we are currently not ready to navigate
them.
Cheers,
Kevin
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 11:52 PM 申远 wrote:
> You could a
You could also read the documentation[1] here about what license is allowed
in ASF project.
[1] https://apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a
Best Regards,
YorkShen
申远
申远 于2019年10月22日周二 下午2:49写道：
> Base on my experience (wearing my Apache Weex's hat), GPL/LGPL dependency
> is not compat
Base on my experience (wearing my Apache Weex's hat), GPL/LGPL dependency
is not compatible with ASF's policy, and you may want to fix the License
problem at the beginning, even before into Incubator. Otherwise, GPL/LGPL
dependency will give you a lot of pain than you'd ever expect.
Best Regards,
Regarding licenses, dplyr is under MIT, see:
https://github.com/tidyverse/dplyr/blob/master/LICENSE.md. However, other
packages are under GPL2.
Here are all the packages that sparklyr currently depends on and their
associated license (This was retrieved from
https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=, si
This looks interesting to me.
I would be willing to contribute, if you would like to add me to the
initial list of committers.
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 10:50 AM Matt Sicker wrote:
> A lot of core R libraries seem to be under GPL. If we build more R
> projects at Apache, it seems like we may need
A lot of core R libraries seem to be under GPL. If we build more R
projects at Apache, it seems like we may need more Apache-licensed (or
compatible) libraries in R.
On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 at 03:12, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I also concerned that the initial committer list only contains 3 com
Hi,
I also concerned that the initial committer list only contains 3 committers.
Why have you not included others in the community that have made contributions?
I don’t know if this is an issue or not but bring it up just in case you not
aware. I can see that some of the tidyverse packages are
Hi,
it's an interesting proposal.
I guess that one of your challenge during the incubation is to extend
the community (only 3 initial committers is very low) and extend the
diversity (two companies affiliation).
Regards
JB
On 19/10/2019 17:53, Kevin Kuo wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> We are proposing
Hi -
An interesting proposal. I am concerned about the very small size of the
Initial Committer list with 3 individuals one of whom I only see small
contributions from on https://github.com/rstudio/sparklyr/graphs/contributors
Do the Mentors intend to be active participants in the community?
A
ในวันที่ ศ. 6 ก.ย. 2019 01:25 Nygard, Carl J
เขียนว่า:
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> > > Cengage wishes to donate the code to Apache, but is unable to do so
> until the project is accepted as an Incubator project.
>
> > Could you expand a little on why is that?
>
> Perhaps it is an issue of understanding the
HI
> On Sep 5, 2019, at 11:25 AM, Nygard, Carl J wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>> Cengage wishes to donate the code to Apache, but is unable to do so until
>>> the project is accepted as an Incubator project.
>
>> Could you expand a little on why is that?
>
> Perhaps it is an issue of understanding the pa
Hi,
> > Cengage wishes to donate the code to Apache, but is unable to do so until
> > the project is accepted as an Incubator project.
> Could you expand a little on why is that?
Perhaps it is an issue of understanding the path to Incubator and trying to
deal with the corporate policies re
Hi,
> Cengage wishes to donate the code to Apache, but is unable to do so until the
> project is accepted as an Incubator project.
Could you expand a little on why is that?
> The Apache community members looking to approve the project understandably
> would like to better understand what they
o get access to the code which is to be donated.
I'm sure you've seen similar issues in the past and I'm looking for some
advice/options to be able to move forward.
--carl
From: Justin Mclean
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2019 4:35 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [P
liche Nachricht --------
Betreff: Re: [PROPOSAL] MetaObjects for Apache Incubator
Von: Justin Mclean
An: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Hi,
> Currently most development is happening within Cengage. The core library
> hasn't changed much, aside from some bug fixes. Most of the recent
> inn
Hi,
> Currently most development is happening within Cengage. The core library
> hasn't changed much, aside from some bug fixes. Most of the recent
> innovation has occurred in other libraries built upon the draagon-metaobjects
> foundations. That code is part of what is proposed to be donat
> > We believe that collaboration is a necessary prerequisite to great
> > outcomes. We believe that healthy debate is an aspect of collaboration
> > necessary for high-quality decisions.
> Where are the discussion and decisions like this being currently made about
> the code base?
> Note, Meta
Hi Justin,
Resending a reply as the first one bounced.
I have sent a request to private @ incubator RE joining the PMC.
This would be my first time acting as an official mentor, any guidance and
help would be greatly appreciated :)
Cheers,
Jamie
--
Sent from: http://apache-incubator-ge
Hi,
Thanks for your proposal it sounds like an interesting project.
> We believe that collaboration is a necessary prerequisite to great
> outcomes. We believe that healthy debate is an aspect of collaboration
> necessary for high-quality decisions.
Where are the discussion and decisions like th
I went ahead and performed the following searches based on the list someone
else provided. Perhaps you can use this?
Note: the term "sketch" commonly refers to an artistic visualization or
drawing.
The use of the term "sketch" in the study of algorithms refer to a synopsis
of some larger set of d
The vote is passed to accept into the incubator. Since there is a cost to
changing the name once infrastructure is set up, I suggest doing the name
search immediately. There seemed to be some consensus to try to keep the
DataSketches name. If there are no objections, I will file a
PODLINGNAMESEARCH
Thanks Henry!
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 10:57 AM Henry Saputra
wrote:
> Thanks, Markus.
>
> Hope you do not mind but I have edited the proposal to reflect the changes.
> Since the people did not actually change, I think we can continue with the
> VOTE
>
>
> - Henry
>
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 10:2
1 - 100 of 5088 matches
Mail list logo
