So I’m not sure if this made it either: is there at least one person interested in collaborating on this project it involves GPT three?
On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 10:47 PM m sacks <msack...@gmail.com> wrote: > Not sure if this made it: > Just a term of endearment, mot taken to be meant literally. > > Sure. > > Initially the community would be a private group put together by me. > > Then we can discuss building it once others have decided if it’s even a > useful application first? > > On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 10:20 PM Daniel Widdis <wid...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I'm not an ASF warlord or general. In fact, I don't think such things >> exist. It's about community. Decisions are made by communities. Warlords, >> generals, and benevolent dictators don't fit well. >> >> Related, I don't see anything "community" in your post. You state "I" >> have got code, not "we". >> >> You can have the best code in the universe, but if you don't have a >> community developing it, it's not really a good fit here. >> >> So tell us less about your code and more about your community developing >> it. >> >> >> On 5/16/22, 10:05 PM, "m sacks" <msack...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I have some gpt3 based python code to simulate leonardo da vinci as a >> chatbot proof of concept. I think it could be useful, but i am not >> sure, so >> i leave it to the council of ASF warlords and generals to decide if >> the >> code should be incubated? >> >> >> I have not shared sources as of yet. >> >> >> >>
