Re: [VOTE] Apache Gravitino to become a Top Level Projec

+1 paulk (binding) On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 11:49 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > While there hasn't been much feedback on the discussion thread, there have > been no objections and a week has passed, so I’m starting a vote for Apache > Gravitino. > > There is a discussion thread at: > https:

Re: [DISCUSS] Accept SAFplus into the Apache Incubator

The other worrying thing is that there has been no blogs, issues, PRs in the project for 8+ years. On Sat, Apr 5, 2025 at 4:29 AM Dave Fisher wrote: > > A major concern is that the codebase is currently GPL-2.0 licensed. > Converting all of the OpenClovis included code will be needed and some >

Re: Use of of "creator of Apache Foo"

Yes, I agree to some degree with the points that Cédric and Julian are making. For me the wording is critical. If the wording is "original creator of the technology behind Apache Foo" or similar I have less concern, assuming it is true, but I also see wording sometimes that causes confusion or dimi

Re: Projects incubating for a long time

A day earlier, I sent a different but related suggestion to NLPCraft (with my mentor hat on). I'll make sure feedback gets back to this list if they respond to that suggestion. Cheers, Paul. On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 8:55 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > Yesterday, I went over the projects that

Re: Grails podling: no website or project status file

It is correct that Groovy is sponsoring Grails and taking the more active approach of doing the mentoring and release vetting (though we welcome others to help if they have time). Having said that, we are trying to follow incubator conventions and practices as far as possible, so I have created th

Re: [VOTE] Apache Wayang (Incubating) 1.0.0 RC5

, Feb 11, 2025 at 10:36 PM Paul King wrote: > > If you have some kind of template that is used when generating the > email for this list, it might pay to include wording about the PPMC > vote, so that it doesn't get missed in the future. > > I also noted that you don

Re: [VOTE] Apache Wayang (Incubating) 1.0.0 RC5

12:01 AM Paul King wrote: > > +1 (binding - with caveats) > > I checked: > * checksum > * incubating in the source zip name > * DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, NOTICE present in source zip > * signatures okay (but see note about KEYS in earlier email) > * maven clean install

Re: [VOTE] Apache Wayang (Incubating) 1.0.0 RC5

ll 2024 Cheers, Paul. On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 10:36 PM Paul King wrote: > > If you have some kind of template that is used when generating the > email for this list, it might pay to include wording about the PPMC > vote, so that it doesn't get missed in the future. > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Wayang (Incubating) 1.0.0 RC5

ust leaving this note here in case anyone else runs into the KEYS problem. In the meantime, I'd suggest the RM adds their key to the release KEYS file. I'll continue with my evaluation. Cheers, Paul. On Sun, Feb 9, 2025 at 8:59 AM Paul King wrote: > > I'd normally expect t

Re: [VOTE] Apache Wayang (Incubating) 1.0.0 RC5

I'd normally expect to see a reference to the PPMC vote. I can see that it happened, so including it here for others: https://lists.apache.org/thread/53hnlvxh880hzolpkfxk01jqy4sthrcc I'll also take a look at the release artifacts over the next few days. Paul. On Sun, Feb 9, 2025 at 3:40 AM

Re: [DISCUSS] Update project maturity model to include trademark and branding?

Looks great to me. On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 12:07 PM tison wrote: > > Hi, > > Here is a continued effort of the thread "Update project maturity > model to include trademark and branding?"[1] early this year. > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/oc9jft1tyo7cbphcyrtwobf4w5rcbhfw > > Brief backgro

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HugeGraph (Incubating) 1.5.0-rc3

er > > Thank you again for your patient feedback, we will continue to improve it~ > > Imba Jin > > On 2024/12/08 21:39:22 Paul King wrote: > > Re: point 2 (I may be missing something but to me it looks like new > > jars in the docker image): > > > > $ do

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HugeGraph (Incubating) 1.5.0-rc3

s it & check similar files. > > Thanks again for your detailed review and valuable insights! > > Best regards, > VGalaxies > > On 2024/12/08 03:02:38 Paul King wrote: > > +1 (binding) with caveats > > > > I checked: > > * Checksum and GPG signatures ar

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HugeGraph (Incubating) 1.5.0-rc3

+1 (binding) with caveats I checked: * Checksum and GPG signatures are OK * LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER exist * Incubating in name * No unexpected binary files in src tar.gz files (I checked mostly the main tar.gz file) * Server from convenience binaries ran fine on macOS 15.1.1 * Compiled from so

Re: Seeking Champion for a Configuration Server (Tower)

The other thing would be the license, which should change from GPL to Apache 2. Virus-free.www.avast.com

[RESULT][IP CLEARANCE] Apache Groovy receiving Geb

The vote has passed (lazy consensus). Thanks! Cheers, Paul. On 2024/10/26 03:56:50 Paul King wrote: > Apache Groovy is receiving a donation of Geb[1], currently at > website[2] and GitHub[3]. > > Geb is a browser automation solution. It brings together the power of > WebDrive

[IP CLEARANCE] Apache Groovy receiving Geb

Apache Groovy is receiving a donation of Geb[1], currently at website[2] and GitHub[3]. Geb is a browser automation solution. It brings together the power of WebDriver, the elegance of jQuery content selection, the robustness of Page Object modelling, and the expressiveness of the Groovy language.

Re: [VOTE] Accept CloudBerry into the ASF Incubator

+1 paulk (binding) On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 7:27 PM Francois Papon wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > Looks very nice! > > If you are missing some mentor, I would me more than happy to help. > > regards, > > François > fpa...@apache.org > francois.pa...@openobject.fr > > Le 04/10/2024 à 02:10, Roman Shap

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Seata (Incubating) v2.1.0-RC4

Others have commented on the release. Just a quick comment on the following wording: "The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of votes are reached." In general, you cannot close the vote early. Some -1 votes may come in after some +1 votes. The idea of the 72 hours is

Re: [VOTE] Have Amoro join the Incubator

+1 binding On Sun, Mar 3, 2024 at 11:45 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > Following on from the discussion of the Amoro proposal [1][2], let's vote on > having it join the Incubator. > > Please cast your vote: > > [ ] +1, have it join the Incubator as an incubating project > [ ] +0, I have no

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Pekko (incubating) as a TLP

+1 (binding). Good luck! On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 9:25 PM PJ Fanning wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > We have positive feedback on the Pekko Vote thread [1] (result [2]). > > I'd like to start an official Incubator VOTE thread now. > > Below are some facts and project highlights from the incubation pha

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache SDAP (Incubating) as a Top Level Project

+1 (binding). Good luck! On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 4:02 AM Riley Kuttruff wrote: > > Hi all, > > Apache SDAP joined Incubator in October 2017. In the time since, we've > made significant progress towards maturing our community and our > project and adopting the Apache Way. > > After community discu

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pekko(incubating) Core 1.0.2-RC1

ob/master/src/main/java/com/clearspring/analytics/stream/frequency/CountMinSketch.java > > > On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 at 00:59, Paul King wrote: > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > [X] Download links are valid. > > [X] Checksums and signatures. > > [X] LICENSE/NOT

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pekko(incubating) Core 1.0.2-RC1

+1 (binding) [X] Download links are valid. [X] Checksums and signatures. [X] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist I did notice "Copyright 2016 AddThis" in the LICENSE file wrt MurmurHash3, something to fix for the next release? Given the accompanying explanation in the file, I don't see this as a sh

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pekko(incubating) Core 1.0.2-RC1

I'll take a look. On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 11:46 PM PJ Fanning wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > This RC includes a security hardening change. I am wondering if any Pekko > mentors or any other Incubator PMC member might have time to review the RC > artifacts so that we can do a release. > > Thanks, >

Re: [VOTE] Retirement of the Apache DataLab

+1 binding On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 7:28 PM Ruslan Kulynych wrote: > > Hi all, > > Based on discussion[1], I would like to call for a vote to retire the Apache > DataLab. > > The voting will last for at least one week to ensure that everyone has time > to express their opinions. > > Please vote a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wayang (Incubating) v0.7.1 RC3

+1 (binding) I checked LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER, checksum and signature. I see Chris has given you useful input on other aspects in the podling vote, so I won't duplicate. "mvn clean install" worked fine on Ubuntu but failed for me on Windows (could be my setup). For the vote email, you normal

Re: is it ok to modify copyright headers that have no end year?

IANAL, but the advice I've been given informally by IP lawyer friends many years ago is don't change the existing copyright. You could instead amend to something like: Original version: > Copyright (C) since 2016 Lightbend Inc. > Subsequent changes made by the Apache Pekko community: > Copyright

Re: [VOTE] Retire PageSpeed

+1 On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 6:47 AM Christian Grobmeier wrote: > Hello, > > as recently discussed, I think the PageSpeed podling is ready for > retirement. > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/jxw7mqmpcfxxp0mnnx28o0k78tym507b > > There has been no activity for a while; there are no signs of change

Re: [VOTE] Retire Hivemall from Incubator

+1 to retire (binding) On Sun, Aug 28, 2022 at 4:57 PM Calvin Kirs wrote: > > Hi IPMC, > > Hivemall has been incubating since 2016-09-13. > > From last year, activity has been low and the chances of attracting new > committers and building a vibrant community seem very slim at this point. > > The

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache EventMesh(Incubating) 1.5.0-rc0

Yes, the build file is using (just a little) Groovy 3 syntax (new in Gradle 7). You could revert to older style syntax but it would probably be better to have a bootstrap step that downloaded the gradle wrapper and then use the wrapper in all of your instructions. The Groovy build has such a setup.

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache InLong(Incubating) as a TLP

+1 (binding) Best of luck going forward! Cheers, Paul. On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 4:33 PM Charles Zhang wrote: > > Dear Apache Incubator Community, > > > The InLong community has a discussion thread [1], passed the community vote > [2], and the vote result is published [3]. We have discussed the gr

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft (incubating) v 0.9.0

+1 (binding) carrying forward my vote and comments from PPMC vote thread. On Sat, Jul 31, 2021 at 3:34 AM Aaron Radzinski wrote: > > Hello all, > This is a call for a vote to release Apache NLPCraft (incubating) > version 0.9.0. Apache NLPCraft is a library for adding a natural > language interfa

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Pinot as TLP

+1 binding, good luck! On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 5:44 AM Mayank Shrivastava wrote: > Dear Incubator Community, > > We have discussed Apache Pinot Podling graduation in the general@incubator > DISCUSS thread [1], and addressed all the questions and concerns brought up > in the thread. Please refer

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft (incubating) v 0.8.0

+1 (binding) carrying over my dev vote Virus-free. www.avast.com <#DAB4FAD8-2D

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft - Java Client (incubating) 0.7.5

+1 binding from me, carrying over my vote On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 11:29 AM Aaron Radzinski wrote: > Hello all, > This is a call for a vote to release Apache NLPCraft - Java Client > (incubating) version 0.7.5. Apache NLPCraft is a library for adding a > natural language interface to any applicat

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft (incubating) 0.7.5

+1 carrying forward my dev vote after the license/notice tweaks I don't think there is an issue with the license of the file mentioned, just the appropriate changes to the license/notice wording to ensure the licensing condition is properly understandable. And I think some other tweaks to license/n

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.8.0.rc3

s, Paul. On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 7:34 AM Leonard Lausen wrote: > Thank you Paul for voting on the release. > > On 2021/03/02 03:53:26, Paul King wrote: > > > * LICENSE file mentions 3rdparty/tvm/3rdparty/rang as "Unlicense". It > would > > be good to clarify

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.8.0.rc3

+1 (binding) Checked: - LICENSE and NOTICE seem okay - DISCLAIMER-WIP exists - Incubating in name - Checksum and signature okay - No unexpected binary file - Built shared library using cmake (without CUDA) - Built Java/Scala jars (also works for Groovy) Comments: * As others have noted, please fi

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Daffodil to a top-level project

+1 (binding) Cheers, Paul. On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 5:01 AM Mike Beckerle wrote: > Incubator Folks, > > We have completed a vote on our community list d...@daffodil.apache.org as > follows: > > Vote Thread: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r91af73ae28284945ffe881cea7877766213eaa405da21e23

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache DolphinScheduler (incubating) as a TLP

+1 (binding) Cheers, Paul. On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 9:36 PM Gang Li wrote: > Hi all, > After discussion with the community [1] and [2], and a positive vote > result [3]. > We'd like to bring this to a discussing at the IPMC. > > Please see the proposed resolution below and let us know what do you

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft (incubating) 0.7.4

+1 carrying my dev vote forward: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/reb06a62c04fed54684c993e80fe01cfff849df3631d85f32e7ab1051%40%3Cdev.nlpcraft.apache.org%3E Cheers, Paul. Virus-free.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft (incubating) 0.7.3

/C "C:\Progra~1\AdoptOpenJDK\jdk-11.0.8.10-hotspot\bin\java -jar "C:\Users\Paul King\AppData\Local\Temp\surefire7851445059229675487\surefirebooter6212500639838130057.jar" "C:\Users\Paul King\AppData\Local\Temp\surefire7851445059229675487" 2021-01-18T18-48-51_629-jvmRun1 sur

Re: [VOTE] Accept Wayang into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Virus-free. www.avast.com <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft - Java Client (incubating) 0.7.2

+1 (binding) carrying my vote over from dev list On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 12:16 PM Aaron Radzinski wrote: > Hello all, > This is a call for a vote to release Apache NLPCraft - Java Client > (incubating) > version 0.7.2. Apache NLPCraft is a library for adding a natural language > interface to any

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft (incubating) 0.7.2

+1 (binding) carrying over my vote On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 2:21 PM Aaron Radzinski wrote: > Hello all, > This is a call for a vote to release Apache NLPCraft (incubating) version > 0.7.2. Apache NLPCraft is a library for adding a natural language interface > to any application. > > The Apache NL

Re: [VOTE] Hop proposal

+1 (binding) Virus-free. www.avast.com <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft (incubating) 0.7.1

+1, carrying my vote over from the dev list: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r333cd17f76303c86b603aa80ce7faa96b443c0351d680b22081a9d64%40%3Cdev.nlpcraft.apache.org%3E On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 3:55 PM Aaron Radzinski wrote: > Hello all, > This is a call for a vote to release Apache NLPCraft (

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft (incubating) 0.7.0

+1, carrying my vote over from dev list Virus-free. www.avast.com <#DAB4FAD8-2

Re: [VOTE] Distribution guidelines for platforms

+1 On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 11:23 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > This vote is to make this official [1] and move the guidelines to the > website. The guidelines will be placed under the podling guides menu and > linked to from the release section in the Incubator policy page [2] > > The last se

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft (Incubating) 0.6.2

+1 carrying my vote over from the dev list Checked hashes and signatures. "maven clean verify" passes (fails for me on Windows JDK8 as per NLPCRAFT-76, passes on Linux JDK11) "maven apache-rat:rat" passes (but it is configured to ignore failures, you can change numUnapprovedLicenses in the pom fro

Re: [VOTE] Distribution guidelines for platforms

My reading of the wording is that there is now more wiggle room for podlings rather than more restrictions. Cheers, Paul. On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 5:51 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > I think all of these situations can occur with or without the new > incubator policy. > > It possibles yes,

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-253) Issues with MXNet releases and their distribution

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-253?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17142439#comment-17142439 ] Paul King commented on INCUBATOR-253: - Anyone including PPMC members (with

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft (Incubating) 0.6.1

+1 (binding) carrying my dev vote forward. I'll note here for anyone running the test suite under Windows - there seems to be some issues on some systems that are being looked at in parallel and testing using WSL2 seems to avoid the problem. Cheers, Paul. On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 4:30 AM Aaron Ra

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache BlueMarlin in the incubator

+1 (binding) On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 4:27 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Following the discussion about BlueMarlin, I would like to start a formal > vote to accept BlueMarlin into the incubator. > > As reminder, here’s the proposal: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/displ

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft - Java Client (Incubating) 0.5.0

+1 binding (carrying forward my earlier vote) On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 9:53 AM Aaron Radzinski wrote: > Hello all, > This is a call for a vote to release Apache NLPCraft - Java Client > (incubating) version 0.5.0. > > The Apache NLPCraft community has voted on and approved a proposal to > release

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft (Incubating) 0.5.0

+1 (binding) Checked: + DISCLAIMER exists + incubating in name + no unexpected binary files + signature okay (from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/nlpcraft/KEYS) + checksum okay + LICENSE okay + NOTICE lines 1-5 correct (remove lines 6-95 for next release, they aren't appropri

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft (Incubating) 0.5.0

's proposed as a template in > https://incubator.apache.org/policy/incubation.html#releases > > Thanks, > -- > Nikita Ivanov > > > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 1:04 AM Paul King wrote: > >> Just on process, the "or until a necessary number of votes are re

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft (Incubating) 0.5.0

Just on process, the "or until a necessary number of votes are reached" won't apply. You might get 3 +1s straight away and a -1 a couple of days later. If that was the total votes, that would still be counted as a failing vote. Cheers, Paul. On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 3:52 PM Aaron Radzinski wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.6.0-rc2

p;utm_content=webmail> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 5:18 PM Paul King wrote: > +1 (but I had some issues noted below which I presume are minor oversights > or due to my environment) > > Checked: > - signatures and hashes for src zip okay

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.6.0-rc2

+1 (but I had some issues noted below which I presume are minor oversights or due to my environment) Checked: - signatures and hashes for src zip okay - incubating in name - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE and NOTICE files (root and daffodil-cli variants seem okay) - source files have ASF or compatibl

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset (incubating) version 0.36.0

+1 (binding) Checked: - signature okay - checksum okay - incubating in name - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE and NOTICE seem okay - didn't appear to have any binary files within tarball (apart from images) - builds from source (using RELEASING/test_run_tarball.sh) Comments: - The instructions in REL

wiki permissions

I don't seem to have wiki permissions. Can someone please enable me? ApacheID: paulk Thanks, Paul.

Re: "Fork Me" on GitHub (was Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache ShardingSphere (incubating) as a TLP)

I would think it is almost ubiquitous now for developers to know that the easiest way for them to create a PR for instance is to fork the project (the source code if you like) on Github. It seems sensible to encourage the use of "Fork me on Github" as it substantially lowers the barrier of newcome

Re: [DISCUSS] Project proposal - Apache Rainbow

I'm probably leaning towards accepting. Given that the closest fit to me seems the DLAB project, I would be keen to see if anyone in that project has an interest in keeping abreast of developments in Rainbow. DLAB is itself also incubating so we wouldn't want to burden them with too many more offic

Re: [VOTE] Release SAMOA 0.5.0 (incubating) RC3

Looks like under "The developer's version artifacts" you have the sha512 hashes, but under the staging repo you just have sha1/md5. On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 7:58 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > HI, > > -1 (binding) because of hash issue - but this is easily fixed without > stopping the vote and there’

Re: [VOTE] Release SAMOA 0.5.0 (incubating) RC3

+1 (binding) with some caveats. I checked: * Incubating in name * DISCLAIMER exists * LICENSE and NOTICE okay (copyright end year in NOTICE needs a bump I would suspect) * Signatures okay * Checksums okay My understanding is that the KEYS file for your project is expected in: https://dist.apach

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 1.0.0-incubating release

I had the same questions Justin mentioned wrt gossip and relayer but forgot to mention that. One approach could be to have your artifacts split into sources and distributions subdirectories (or similar names). Cheers, Paul. On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 5:37 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > +1 (bin

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 1.0.0-incubating release

+1 (binding) I checked: * Incubating in name * DISCLAIMER exists * LICENSE and NOTICE okay * Signatures okay * Checksums okay * Rat checks okay (hacked to make work without .git dir) I noticed two copies of many files within the tgz and zip source archives but this didn't seem to impact extractio

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Annotator (incubating) version 0.1.0 (-rc.1)

Hi Annotator dev team. Congrats on getting to this exciting stage! I am just checking up on process. Are you following the traditional podling release process: https://incubator.apache.org/policy/incubation.html#releases I.e. first a vote on dev mailing list followed by a subsequent vote from incu

Double entry for FreeMarker

Hi all, I noticed under Apache Projects: https://projects.apache.org/projects.html That FreeMarker is listed twice (even though they graduated in 2018): - Apache FreeMarker - Apache FreeMarker (Incubating)

Re: [DISCUSS] Project proposal - Apache Rainbow

Indeed, it does sound interesting. I would find it useful if the "existing Apache projects" bit of "Rainbow is in development, leveraging existing Apache projects." could be expanded in any way. I know there is a list of external dependencies later but any further description of how those technol

Re: [VOTE] Accept NLPCraft into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 7:54 AM Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > Hello. > > As the discussion of NLPCraft proposal [1] has been wrapped up [2] I would > like > to call a VOTE to accept this project into the Apache Incubator. > > Please cast your vote: > > [ ] +1, bring NLPCraft into I

Re: [DISCUSS] NLPCraft Proposal

ncubator the license will change to plain Apache > License, v2.0. There's no disagreement on this among project members. > Thanks! > -- > Nikita Ivanov > > > On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 9:35 PM Paul King wrote: > >> Looks like you have close to a full house for me

Re: [DISCUSS] NLPCraft Proposal

Looks like you have close to a full house for mentors. I could certainly put my hat in the ring if you need another, otherwise I will certainly be an interested community member. It seems like an interesting project. I would have a particular interest in Groovy/Micronaut integration. I did notice

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DataSketches-java 1.2.0-incubating-RC2

> Is my understanding correct? > > Lee. > > > > > > On Sat, Jan 25, 2020 at 3:19 PM Paul King wrote: > >> +1 (binding) with one minor comment >> >> Checked: >> * incubating in name >> * DISCLAIMER-WIP exists >> * LICENSE >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DataSketches-java 1.2.0-incubating-RC2

+1 (binding) with one minor comment Checked: * incubating in name * DISCLAIMER-WIP exists * LICENSE * NOTICE (year bump needed 2019 => 2019-2020 as already noted by Justin) * no unexpected binary files * signatures * hash * mvn clean install (1) * mvn apache-rat:check (1) Works on Linux. On Windo

Re: [VOTE] Myriad retirement

+1 (binding) Cheers, Paul. On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 1:14 AM Javi Roman wrote: > Unfortunately, despite an effort to reboot the project about more than one > year, we weren't successful in keeping the existing committers active. At > this point, a decision to retire the podling was taken, and a v

Re: [VOTE] Accept YuniKorn into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 3:47 AM Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to call a vote on accepting YuniKorn into the Apache Incubator. > > Please see the discussion thread [1]. > > Please see the full proposal: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/Yuni

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset (incubating) version 0.35.2

+1 (binding) with some minor comments below Checked: - incubating in name - checksum - signature - didn't appear to have any binary files within tarball (apart from images) - builds from source (with version change) Comments: - I followed the instructions in RELEASING/README.md to build from sour

Re: [VOTE] Recommend 'Apache Druid graduation to Top Level Project' resolution to the board

+1 binding Cheers, Paul. On Sun, Dec 8, 2019 at 7:55 AM Gian Merlino wrote: > Earlier this year, Druid voted to graduate to a top level project. The vote > passed in the Druid community and the Incubator, and a resolution was > submitted to the Board, but needed to be shelved at the last minute.

Re: [VOTE] Apache BatchEE leaving the incubator

+1 to join Apache Geronimo On Fri., 6 Dec. 2019, 5:51 pm Romain Manni-Bucau, wrote: > Hi everyone, > > BatchEE community voted to leave the incubator to join Apache Geronimo as a > subproject. > > Here is the vote thread: > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/batchee-dev/201912.mbox/browse

Re: [VOTE] Accept NuttX into the Apache Incubator

+1 binding On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 3:30 PM 俊平堵 wrote: > Hi folks, > > > The [DISCUSS] thread on NuttX has died down. > > > Accordingly, I would like to call a VOTE to accept NuttX into the > > Apache Incubator. > > > Please cast your vote: > > > [ ] +1, bring NuttX into the Incubator > > [ ]

Re: Remove PMC incubator page

+1 On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 6:59 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > The page here [1] doesn’t really add anything that is not written out > elsewhere and seems redundant. If no-one objects I’ll remove it. > > Thanks, > Justin > > > 1. https://incubator.apache.org/guides/pmc.html >

Re: [VOTE] Recommend Apache Rya graduation to Top Level Project resolution to the Board

+1 On Fri., 6 Sep. 2019, 6:29 pm Adina Crainiceanu, wrote: > The Apache Rya (incubating) community is bringing the attached resolution > to graduate to a Top Level Project up for a formal IPMC VOTE. > > -We completed all the tasks documented in the status file [1] > -The name Apache Rya was appr

Re: [VOTE] Recommend 'Apache Druid graduation to Top Level Project' resolution to the board

+1 (binding) Good luck! Cheers, Paul. On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 5:03 PM Gian Merlino wrote: > The Apache Druid community has recently discussed our readiness for > graduation [1] and voted on it affirmatively [2, 3]. We've also assessed > ourselves against the maturity model [4] and collaborated

Re: [DISCUSS] IPMC votes on releases

Another variation/option for those using the WIP disclaimer might be that since the WIP disclaimer kind of says this release doesn't have "full official" status from an ASF point of view then one way of thinking about it is that perhaps full official IPMC endorsement is less of a requirement so IPM

Re: [MENTORS] IPMC Policy change work in progress disclaimer

Kudos for progressing this idea. I really like it. It should allow improvements from the perspective of both podlings and reviewers. Cheers, Paul. On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 12:25 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > The work in progress progress disclaimer (DISCLAIMER-WIP) has been added > to the IPM

Re: [VOTE] Heron Release 0.20.1-incubating Release Candidate 3

+1 (binding) I checked: - incubating in name - DISCLAIMER present - Signature and hashes okay - LICENSE is missing a number of permissive licenses (I didn't check ones Justin had already covered but third_party\python\semver seems to be missing from list of BSD licensed software though it does app

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Rya (Incubating) version 4.0.0 RC1

+1 (binding) I checked: - incubating in name - signatures and hashes okay - DISCLAIMER exists - NOTICE year needs updating as previously noted (fix next release) - LICENSE is okay - No unexpected binary files - Al files have ASF headers - `mvn -DskipTests clean install` passes - `mvn clean install

Re: DLab needs help

I've jumped on their dev list as well and can try to help out informally. Let's see how it goes with Furkan helping and I consider a more formal role if they still need help. Cheers, Paul. On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 8:37 PM Furkan KAMACI wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks Justin! I've just started to write a

Re: Cookbook and duplication of content on incubator site

All sounds good to me too! +1 On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 6:26 PM Bertrand Delacretaz < bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> wrote: > Hi Justin, > > Thank you for addressing this, I was planning to work on this > duplication of content but didn't get to it yet. > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 8:44 AM Justin Mclea

Re: DataSketches needs some help

I have subscribed to their dev list. I'll try to help out a bit informally if I can. If needed I might be able to assist with Mentoring but I don't have a lot of cycles free at the moment. Cheers, Paul. On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:57 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > DataSketches seems to be hav

Re: New disclaimer text

+1 for: DISCLAIMER-PERMISSIVE or DISCLAIMER-WIP Virus-free. www.avast.com <#DA

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.5.0.rc2

+1 binding checked signature/checksum/disclaimer license seems very thorough but two possible clarifications are suggested below (*) ran `make lib/libmxnet.so` successfully (opencv was listed as an optional dependency but it seemed to be needed for this to work) ran `make scalapkg` to generate Sca

Re: New disclaimer text

+1 On Sat, Jul 13, 2019 at 10:44 AM Sheng Wu wrote: > +1 from me to have two disclaimers, chosen by podings. > > Also, +1 from me, the one they chosen should stay in website and > announcement. > > Sheng > > Justin Mclean 于2019年7月13日 周六上午9:37写道： > > > Hi, > > > > +1 Works for me. > > > > It will

Re: [Discuss] Graduate Apache OpenWhisk (incubating) as a TLP

I have been following some of the OpenWhisk traffic on the mailing list but mostly at arms length, so I thought I would have my first play writing a Groovy action this evening to see if the process would shed any light on the project's graduation readiness. The result (with kudos to Markus Thömmes

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flagon (Incubating) v2.0.0

m a few other source > files. The best way we could manage to get headers in those these build > files resulted in some repetition of headers from various arc files. We’ll > see if we can’t find a better way, but at present we’re leaning on > compliance and functional soundness. > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flagon (Incubating) v2.0.0

+1 (binding) Checked: * incubator in name * LICENSE/NOTICE files * checksums * ASF headers in files (though a few js files in UserAleWebExtension have the header repeated multiple times - not a big deal but probably worth correcting unless these files are generated that way) Cheers, Paul.

Re: Podlings, the Incubator, relationships and Apache

My +1 to the 2nd camp. For me it's about transparency. I don't see an issue if a podling release has some significant flaws. For me, the ideal would be if it is easy for podling members, reviewers, and downstream users to easily determine whether such flaws are known and what they are. It can be a

  1   2   >