On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Kevin Kluge wrote:
> The draft proposal document is available at
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CloudStackProposal.
Looks great! Also looks like you've got plenty of interest, so that's
also great :-)
Some random thoughts:
* It reads like you have some inter
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> It sounds like I wasn't clear enough.
>
> The proposal is for the following release artifacts:
>
> (1) A source-only tar
> (2) A source+binary dependencies convenience tar
> (3) A binary tar
>
> This is instead of:
>
> (1) A source-only tar
> (2
(dropped infra@)
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> I'm exceedingly sorry here that the IPMC as a whole let you down by
> not turning into these issues and dealing with them at the outset.
Me too.
> Personally, I have no objection to including mutant jars in a -deps
> bi
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Paolo Castagna
wrote:
> here is a vote on a release for Apache Jena LARQ module:
> jena-larq-1.0.0-incubating.
...
> Proposed files and structure to merge with existing dist/ area:
> http://people.apache.org/~castagna/merge-jena-larq-1.0.0-RC-1/
+1
cheers,
Leo
-
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> This is a call for vote to graduate the Apache Jena podling from Apache
> Incubator to be a top level project.
+1, binding, mentor
cheers!
- Leo (doing a little celebration dance)
--
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 8:42 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 29 March 2012 18:43, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>> On Mar 29, 2012, at 6:17 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
>>> Personally, I agree with Roy. Perhaps it might seem a little odd to include
>>> the text of e.g. the GPLv2 in one of our LICENSE files (alongsi
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 1:16 AM, Leo Simons wrote:
>> That said, I'm not aware of us actually having such a release out there?
>
> Take such fringe projects like Ant, Tomcat, Lucene and Xalan that have
> been
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Let's decouple this thread from the specific issue of the ManifoldCF
> release. There's a long tradition of Apache releases like the ones
> ManifoldCF is producing, so turning this suddenly into a blocker is
> IMHO bad business, especially s
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Leo Simons wrote:
>> Can we get 2 more IPMC votes?
>
> On a related note, who are currently mentoring Jena? The status page
> [1] doesn't show.
>
> The Jena team page [2] lists y
+1 from me.
Can we get 2 more IPMC votes?
(Checked KEYS, signatures, LICENSEs, NOTICEs, license headers. Built
source release, watched maven download the internet. Ran compiled
source and binary distribution and played with web interface. Almost
remembered how to write SPARQL. Etc. All looks good
Hey hey,
Jukka this is sounding so timid :). You know, I think I'll break rank
and tell you what I really think. You may want to sit down first.
You [1] did a *kick ass* job on the last report. Kick. Ass. [2]. Kapow!
As well as spending the time to look through and digest it all
beforehand on
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Billie J Rinaldi
wrote:
> Please vote on recommending the graduation of
> Apache Accumulo with the following resolution to
> the ASF Board.
+1 from me.
Well done, that was pretty fast :)
Is it right that your PMC roster doesn't have apache members on it?
That's f
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 11:19 PM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> The Jena PPMC has voted to release
>
> Apache Jena TDB 0.9.0-incubating
>
> and we would now be grateful if members of IPMC would review and vote for
> this release.
+1 from me.
cheers,
Leo
-
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Leo, are you out there?
Hmm? Oh, this again...
Having company names or trademarks in java namespaces is a pretty
stupid convention. It gets us mess like this...
There is no policy that incubating java projects must rename to use an
org.
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> The Jena PPMC has voted to release
>
> Apache Jena TDB 0.9.0-incubating
>
> and we would now be grateful if members of IPMC would review and vote for
> this release.
+1 from me.
(justification:
1) I do not consider unintuitive file name a
Hey folks,
TL;DR
Small steps! Less friction! Lazy consensus! Reversible change!
Meritocracy! YAY :-D
History
"Use small reversible steps" is a powerful idea when evolving things,
like when evolving a software architecture. It's an idea that was made
popular @ apache by S
(back from holiday, still catching up, just replied on jena-dev, but
for the record since this is a [VOTE]...)
> On 8 February 2012 13:03, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>> The Jena PPMC has voted to release
>>
>> Apache Jena TDB 0.9.0-incubating
>>
>> and we would now be grateful if members of IPMC would
+1
I'd also suggest that the below is a partial answer to the board's
questions to the IPMC on how it would improve oversight so it should
probably go in our report.
cheers,
Leo
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>> On Thu, F
+1
- Leo
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> In the interest of moving the current discussion matters forward, please VOTE
> on this recommendation to the board by the IPMC. I'll leave the VOTE open
> for at least the next 72 hours:
>
> [ ] +1 Recommend Jukka Zittin
Hey folks,
I just wanted to chime in with a +1 for the general direction. I think
there's actually a lot of work to do to iron out how to reorganize
things. Before digging in, I suggest we abstract out a little bit to
see if we have consensus on the overall goals and desired end state
before start
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Ralph Goers
> wrote:
>> On Jan 29, 2012, at 12:16 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Alan D. Cabrera
>>> wrote:
On Jan 29, 2012, at 6:18 AM, Ate Douma wrote:
>
Hey Robert,
Thanks for this; it was obviously a lot of work! I like the word
picks, flow and style of this guide a lot. There's a lot to read here
and some new stuff to learn for me -- I confess I've been ignoring as
much about trademarks as I can until a time comes up when I actually
have a need
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> We may also have semantic gaps. Leo's [RT] may be presuming that a
> podling's "board report"[sic] is merely a bureaucratic requirement.
Hmm :-)
And so the threads collide...
...I guess I'll allow it. But since we're in my thoughts now, I'll
Hey Don,
Thanks for your reply. You are quite right, of course. I hope I am
also right at the same time :-). Maybe I can clarify...
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Donald Whytock wrote:
> Like Apache, But Sexier...LABS? I can totally see that. Anyone want
> to start an Apache LABS podling?
I
Hey folks,
I started writing this e-mail in November or so. My normal approach
with stuff like this is wait for a non-contentious quiet period before
starting a new thread, to maximize the chance the words will be read
for what they say rather than interpreted in the context of some
heated debate.
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> If there is a community
> and that community doesn't want Apache to fork the code that they created,
> then we will not fork that code at Apache. If the original developers of the
> code do not want their license changed, then we will not
Hey hey,
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Martijn Dashorst
wrote:
> Now the big question: is Etch a candidate for graduating to TLP?
>
> I think it is, given the facts. It will be a TLP with issues of
> activity, but so far user questions, development questions are
> answered and releases are cut.
Hey folks,
I felt I had to take a look at this. Like Ralph I was very concerned
when I saw Ethan's e-mail. Thanks a lot for writing it Ethan, and
thanks for writing it with so much detail.
I just read all the e-mail about bloodhound I could find (that I had
pretty much ignored when I saw other pe
Hey hey,
(Pff. I like replying in-line but this is a hard e-mail to reply to
in-line so I will top post.)
If I understand your policy question: will apache allow an incubating
community to show up and start a project when they are forking another
project?
I'd say, in general, yes, probably, if a
Hey folks,
I had to think about this a bunch. We don't have anything like this at
apache today.
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 9:37 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 15:30, Raju Bitter wrote:
>> (..) Adobe Flex is quite different from most Apache projects (...)
>> it looks like the outpu
*bump*. We have 2 +1s from mentors already, so at a minimum we need
just one more binding vote to do this release. Anyone have time to do
the review?
thanks!
Leo
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> Please vote on releasing the following as
> Apache Jena version 2.7.0-incub
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 9:20 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> I would like to propose Flex to be an Apache Incubator project.
>
> Here's a link to the proposal:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/FlexProposal
Pasted inline:
= Apache Flex Proposal =
== Abstract ==
Apache Flex is an application framework
Yupyup. I thought I'd add a little background rant here, that I wrote
for the jena podling a bit ago. Purely optional reading but maybe
illuminating for some.
cheerio,
- Leo
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Leo Simons wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Benson Margulies
Hey hey,
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> +1 binding. Given the sheer number of committers involved in this podling
> there will be some work to do trying to gel a coherent development community
> out of the group. While I am optimistic, I am reminded of Roy's cautions
> a
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding
> down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an
> Apache Incubator project.
+1 from me (binding).
cheers,
Leo
+1!
cheers,
Leo
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:39 AM, arv...@cloudera.com wrote:
> As there are no active discussions on the [PROPOSAL] thread for a few
> days now, I will like to initiate the vote to accept Sqoop as an
> Apache Incubator project. The proposal discussion thread and full text
> of the
+1 and welcome on board.
cheers,
Leo
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 5:38 AM, Jonathan Hsieh wrote:
> [ ] +1 Accept Flume for incubation
> [ ] +0 Indifferent to Flume incubation
> [ ] -1 Reject Flume for incubation
...
> = Flume - A Distributed Log Collection System =
>
> == Abstract ==
>
> Flume is
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 6:58 PM, wrote:
> Since this is a large download, I wonder whether the quoted numbers are
> impacted at all by timeouts, abandoned downloads attempts, etc. In other
> words, is it counting the HTTP GET's? Or the successful downloads? That
> may influence the load by quit
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>> 30 downloads per day or per month?
>>
>> 52TB per month is still a lot...
>
> per day.
> Look at this chart:
> http://marketing.openoffice.org/marketing_bouncer.html
TL;DR: these bandwidth numbers are not actually that scary or
imp
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Just remember, we haven't yet even voted on whether or not to accept
>> the podling.
>>
>> These are decisions the podling should be making.
>
> Are you ready to call for a vote? :)
Whoah! Please don't call for a vote -- I would much rather
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> I'm a bit up to my eyes in OpenNLP. Can one of you get the initial
> status page going?
On it.
- Leo
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
Hey hey,
I definitely understand the reasoning. Hmm. I think the way to look at it is,
"it depends, but do whatever is needed to allow apache liberal rights to
sublicense all the IP to it's users".
The second way to look at it is that logic and legal stuff are not always as
closely connected a
Hey folks,
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 4:34 AM, Craig L Russell
wrote:
> I think of a CCLA as a combination of an SGA to cover the software grant
> plus an acknowledgement that people in the company are going to work on
> Apache projects, whether on their own time or company time.
>
> So, if a CCLA i
+1 obviously!
- Leo
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> +1 binding
>
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 10:17 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
>> Lacking a lot of binding votes...
>>
>> +1 binding
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 9:10 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
>>> Please vote on the acceptan
On 4/15/10 10:42 PM, Tom White wrote:
I would like to propose Whirr as an incubator proposal.
Whirr will be a set of libraries for running cloud services, such as
Hadoop or Cassandra. The initial code (for Hadoop) is hosted as a
Hadoop contrib module, but I believe it would flourish as its own
p
On 4/22/10 10:21 AM, Tobias Schlitt wrote:
I updated the proposal to reflect the objections regarding the
infrastructure. Our questions regarding the import of our SVN history
has been cleared.
Are there further comments, suggestions, objections?
Very nicely written proposal, well done! Looks
+1
- Leo
On 2/12/10 4:08 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
Hello all,
I started a discussion thread a week-ish ago to seek out issues for
Subversion's graduation. The couple bits that were raised[1] have been
handled, I believe. So with that said, I am unaware of any potential
showstoppers, and would like
On 1/26/10 6:00 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 4:49 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
Before calling for a vote to graduate Subversion, I figured it prudent
to have a discussion first. I believe Subversion is quite ready (and
has been, but the holidays and whatnot kept me from sending t
On 1/14/10 11:41 AM, Vincent Siveton wrote:
I would like to start an official vote to recommend the graduation of
Apache Shindig as a Top Level Project to the Board.
+1!
- Leo
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@inc
Hey folks,
The incubator is here to help. It is about education. It is about
teaching podlings how to work here at apache, about showing people what
to be aware of.
The incubator is *not* here to assess or judge or dictate or lecture or
draft policy or go on long rants about The One True Way
Heya OpenCMIS folks,
Since it looks like you aren't currently supported by a champion or
mentor [1], I thought I'd fill in a small part and inject some warm
fuzzies...
*Thanks* for open sourcing your project and *thanks* for considering
doing it at apache. Its always a lot of effort to go th
On 12/11/09 1:14 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
I would like to present an incubator proposal for a new Validation
podling, which would be a JSR-303 Bean Validation follow-on to the
existing Apache Commons Validation 1.x project, but based on a new
incoming codebase with a software grant from Agimatec G
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 5:16 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> this is also the case for Nightly Builds, accessible by the
> public; Legally they are "publishing to the public" (i.e. opposite of
> 'for private use') and bound by licenses and agreements.
> And finally, from Copyright law perspective, you
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> Todd Volkert wrote:
>> Does anyone on this list know of an existing open source pure-Java Advanced
>> Audio Coding (AAC) library? If not, are there any audiophiles on this list
>> that would be interested in incubating such a project with me?
Hey hey,
I wasn't going to say anything but since this is dragging on...
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 1:08 AM, Doug Cutting wrote:
> Would we permit someone to mirror other files from trunk on the website?
Yes, definitely. Most projects publish their websites by pushing files
into SVN. Many projects
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Ross Gardler
wrote:
> 2009/12/1 Scott Wilson :
>> "On http://incubator.apache.org/wookie/ is it possible to add somewhere that
>> the original development was funded by the European Commission through the
>> TENCompetence Project?"
>
> I see no reason why this shou
Hey hey,
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Josh Thompson wrote:
> The Apache VCL community voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache
> VCL 2.1. We would like to request the endorsement of the Incubator PMC to
> publish this release.
>
> The release artifact, sums, and GPG signature can b
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 4:40 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Justin Erenkrantz
> wrote:
>
>> As Hyrum suggests, we can use org.apache.subversion.* if we want to
>> create a new (better) Java interface within our versioning rules - but
>> that isn't necessary nor shou
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Todd Volkert wrote:
> The Apache Pivot community feels that it is ready to graduate into the
> "Apache Pivot" top-level project.
+1 from me!
cheers,
Leo
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubs
Hey hey,
I've checked in on Pivot now and again and reviewing recent
activities, I think its definitely ready to leave the nest! I will be
happy to vote +1 when it comes to a vote.
cheers,
Leo
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 3:10 AM, Todd Volkert wrote:
> The feeling among the members of the Pivot pod
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> There are two other issues to discuss for the Subversion podling:
>
> * moving the mailing lists directly to @subversion.apache.org
> * placing the source code at /subversion/ rather than /incubator/subversion/
>
> We are hoping to minimize over
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Matthieu Riou wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 8:31 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>>
>> As Martijn alluded to, I think we'd need some more context as to why and
>> how they use RTC.
>>
> Yes, sorry for the lack of details. The context is Cassandra and they're
> doing RTC
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 04:07, William A. Rowe, Jr.
> wrote:
>> Leo Simons wrote:
>>>
>>> Here's what I understand:
>>>
>>> 1) Apache rule: all apache releases must be made by PMCs
>&
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 8:23 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
wrote:
> Greg Stein wrote:
>>
>> Sponsors
>> * Champion: Greg Stein
>
> Cool
>
>> * Nominated Mentors: Justin Erenkrantz, Greg Stein, Sander Striker, Daniel
>> Rall
>
> Once again, caution against committers == mentors (== 'project leads').
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 11:16, Leo Simons wrote:
>>...
>> Not merit, just "binding vote". I agree that it sucks, but it is not
>> something where the incubator has "gone awry", it has _always_ been
&g
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Leo Simons wrote:
>> Also, to be clear, as an IPMC member I spend quite a bit of time with
>> projects where I am not a mentor, casting (binding) votes on things
>> like their release
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> To be clear, it's on the mentors to decide what is applicable and
> necessary for graduation - not the IPMC as a whole. The IPMC as a
> whole has only two roles: approving a proposal and recommending
> graduation
Also, to be clear, as an
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo wrote:
>
> Thanks Leo, your input is much appreciated.
>
> In addition to this +1, we received a +1 from Kevan Miller in the Wink
> community vote. Is that vote transportable here? If so, then we just need one
> more +1 to release as the vote h
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 1:25 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> The Apache Incubator is about EDUCATION. It is about TEACHING podlings
> how to work here at Apache.
So what are you teaching with e-mails like this, Greg?
When you disagree with someone, SHOUT a bit and write a long rant?
Or perhaps that usin
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 2:26 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 7:39 AM, Leo Simons wrote:
>> PS: +1 to start incubation obviously. The record is 2 weeks set for
>> MerlinDeveloper back in 2003...you have 9 days left to try and beat it
Hey, you snipped the smile
+1 from me!
cheers,
Leo
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Nicholas Gallardo
wrote:
> The Wink community has voted on and approved the release
> of Wink 1.0 (RC-5). We would now like to request the
> approval of the Incubator PMC for this release.
>
> Details of the Wink community vote can be fou
+1, nice work folks!
cheers,
Leo
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
>
> The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache
> Cassandra 0.4.2. We would now like to request the approval of the
> Incubator PMC for this release.
>
> Cassandra is a massively scalable,
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 7:46 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 14:44, Greg Stein wrote:
>> All of the existing tags/branches of svn use a tweaked Apache Software
>> License, v1.1, and generally have a file header claims a copyright by
>> CollabNet.
>>
>> trunk is licensed under Apache
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 9:23 PM, Bryant Luk wrote:
> Thanks for the links. One general comment I have is that I understand
> this is part of the incubation process (and no offense intended to Leo
> since obviously taking energy and time for this) but if I can't look
> and see if other Apache proj
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Bryant Luk wrote:
>> The source release has a LICENSE and a NOTICE file that indicates it
>> contains a bunch of stuff it does not actually contain. AFAICS it
>> should simply have a LICENSE that is just the Apache License and a
>> NOTICE file that has just our sta
Yo. Looking pretty cool! Sorry, but, few tidbits inline...
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo
wrote:
> The Wink community voted on and approved the release of Apache Wink 1.0. We
> would now like to request the approval of the Incubator PMC for this
> release.
>
> Podling vote t
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 6:59 AM, Paul Querna wrote:
> I would like to propose incubating the existing Libcloud project to join the
> ASF
Cool! I will try to make the time to help out a little; I'm interested
in this space :)
cheers,
Leo
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> On Sep 16, 2009, at 4:32 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:43 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
After much thought, I am voting -1 for 1 main reason.
1:
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Leo Simons wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
>> I'm curious though, when you say "...which makes me whinge just enough
>> to not give a +1", is that hypothetical, or is there feedback that we
>>
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
> I'm curious though, when you say "...which makes me whinge just enough
> to not give a +1", is that hypothetical, or is there feedback that we
> could incorporate so that you would actually vote for our release?
Nah, it means just fix your open
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 08:52 +0100, sebb wrote:
>>
>> The source archive contains 3 files that are not in SVN:
>>
>> Cli.tokens
>> CliLexer.java
>> CliParser.java
>>
>> These are generated files.
>>
>> Either store the files in SVN and release th
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Francis De Brabandere
wrote:
> I added myself a while ago to the keys in our
> repo/trunk/tools/KEYS.txt. Should we move that file to trunk and
> publish it in the dist?
I would say so. The advantage of having the KEYS file also in the
/dist/ is that it'll be clos
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 10:44 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 09/09/2009, Leo Simons wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 10:28 PM, sebb wrote:
>> > Does the release actually *include* JUnit, or is that only used for
>> > testing?
>> > If so, then it should not be the i
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Leo Simons wrote:
> (dropped cassandra-dev)
>
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 10:44 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 09/09/2009, Leo Simons wrote:
>>> Even if it is not in the release I believe there is nothing wrong with
>>> putting an acknowledg
(dropped cassandra-dev)
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 10:44 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 09/09/2009, Leo Simons wrote:
>> Even if it is not in the release I believe there is nothing wrong with
>> putting an acknowledgment in the NOTICE file. (putting terms in the
>> LICENSE file tha
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 10:28 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 08/09/2009, Eric Evans wrote:
...
> Does the release actually *include* JUnit, or is that only used for testing?
> If so, then it should not be the in the NOTICE file, nor in the binary
> release.
Even if it is not in the release I believe there
G-856 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-856>] -
> Defaults to cont...@type="html" when omitted
> - [SHINDIG-857 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-857>] -
> public key id param key should be xoauth_public_key
> - [SHINDIG-1107 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-1107>] -
> Clean up shindig dependencies
> - [SHINDIG-1135 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-1135>] -
> Bump ehcache to 1.6.1
>
--
cheers,
Leo Simons
--
http://lsimons.wordpress.com/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 3:05 AM, Todd Volkert wrote:
>> > > The LICENSE file does not contain the full CCA LICENSE for the Silk
>> > > icons; see http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/legalcode for
>> > > the full text.
>> >
>> > Good to know - I'll update it on the trunk. Given that we got
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> We have in this proposal a lot of people who are not felix committers and
> who are not even apache committers at all.
>
> They want to work on some code and create a community around it. The way
> the ASF works means that the incubator is t
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Jeremy Hughes wrote:
> We appreciate any feedback and comments on the proposal.
* Any chance of one or two of the other ASF members involved also
stepping up as a mentor?
* Projects that consist of groups of components often have some
problems maintaining sufficien
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 4:40 AM, Greg Brown wrote:
> If I can attempt to summarize, there is a difference between the *concept*
> of a leader and the *title* of a leader here at ASF (please correct me if I
> am wrong).
Correct! You missed the rationale in the summary, though :-)
* There is a goal
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> So who's going to do what about XAP?
>
> I tried understanding the related threads, but I couldn't figure out
> why it's so complicated. If it were up to me, I'd simply follow [1].
> In fact, unless someone takes some action on XAP by the end
Hey thrift folks,
Someone just pointed out
http://incubator.apache.org/thrift/download/
I'm afraid that's not exactly what we'd like to see. Can you
please spend some time reviewing the pages at
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html
? It would be really good if y'al
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 12:03 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> As you know, we've been preparing our proposal to submit Traffic Server to
> the Incubator for a few weeks now. With the help from our champion (thanks
> Doug!), and the entire Incubator community, it's my pleasure to submit a
> request for Tr
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 11:08 PM, Martijn Dashorst
wrote:
> If a community meets all the criteria, but hasn't discovered a new
> committer (or two) by itself, is the community ready for graduation?
Potentially, yes. Likely, no :-)
> If not, how can we—mentors— nudge the community to focus on thi
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 2:48 AM, Todd Volkert wrote:
> The Pivot community voted on and has approved a proposal to release Apache
> Pivot 1.2 Release Candidate 3. We would now like to request the permission
> of the Incubator PMC to publish the artifacts on the Pivot download page.
...
> http://peop
Hi,
> We already got two new mentors signed up (thanks to your posts to the httpd
> devel list I think). So, we're up to three now, how many do we need to be
> considered for a vote?
3 mentors is usually considered enough :)
> Is there anything else missing?
Nope, it looks like you have your du
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Ian Boston wrote:
> Please review and vote on approving the first release of Apache
> Shindig version 1.0-incubating.
...
> Proposed release:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/shindig-staging-002//org/apache/shindig/shindig/1.0-incubating/
+1 (bi
On May 25, 2009, at 9:31 AM, Felix Meschberger wrote:
The Sling podling has voted on asking the Incubator PMC to support its
graduation as a top level project.
Enthousiastically and confidently +1.
All the best!
- Leo
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
On May 23, 2009, at 10:50 PM, Santiago Gala wrote:
Is it that we have identified a new issue that actually affects
_all_ Maven based releases, not just Shindig?
No not necessarily. You can use maven to produce binary releases that
have all the required legal details inside of them; it just isn'
1 - 100 of 498 matches
Mail list logo
