Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Baremaps 0.8.2-rc3 (incubating)

Hello, I follow up with my vote: +1 (non-binding) > On 19 Feb 2025, at 21:54, Bertil Chapuis wrote: > > Hello Everyone, > > This is a call for a vote to release Apache Baremaps 0.8.2 (incubating), > release candidate 3. Apache Baremaps is a toolkit and a set of infrastructure > components f

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Baremaps 0.7.3-rc1 (incubating)

I also carry my +1 non-binding vote from dev. > On 18 Apr 2024, at 13:08, Calvin Kirs wrote: > > Carry my +1 binding from dev@ vote. > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 7:06 PM Bertil Chapuis > wrote: > >> Hello Everyone, >> >> This is a call for a vote to release Apache B

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Baremaps 0.7.2-rc3 (incubating)

+1 (binding) Downloaded, checked signatures, checked checksums Leonard > On 3 Oct 2023, at 00:10, Bertil Chapuis wrote: > > Hello Everyone, > > This is a call for a vote to release Apache Baremaps 0.7.2 (incubating), > release candidate 3. Apache Baremaps is a toolkit and a set of infrastruc

Re: [PROPOSAL][RFC] CloudStack for the Apache Incubator

o say something about that...but that doesn't seem to be the case :) cheers, Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Question about downloading binaries

for themselves what is the best approach. For example, I don't particularly understand the purpose/value of either version of (2) (wouldn't I just always want the binary version?), but that's fine :) cheerio, Leo - T

Re: Question about downloading binaries

conveniences as well is not much of a discussion. cheers, Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Jena LARQ 1.0.0-incubating

On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Paolo Castagna wrote: > here is a vote on a release for Apache Jena LARQ module: > jena-larq-1.0.0-incubating. ... > Proposed files and structure to merge with existing dist/ area: > http://people.apache.org/~castagna/merge-jena-larq-1.0.0-RC-1/ +1

Re: [IMPC] [VOTE] Graduate Apache Jena as a Top Level Project

On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote: > This is a call for vote to graduate the Apache Jena podling from Apache > Incubator to be a top level project. +1, binding, mentor cheers! - Leo (doing a little celebration

Re: Multi-licensed dependencies

have been defined by Legal. While it's probably good to have Roy's preferences (which I trust are good ones) reflected in our policy docs, that should happen via legal-discuss in this case, and even after that, we should not change what we teach our podlings until the docs have changed. It get

Re: Binary dependencies in source releases (Was: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC0)

On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 1:16 AM, Leo Simons wrote: >> That said, I'm not aware of us actually having such a release out there? > > Take such fringe projects like Ant, Tomcat, Lucene and Xalan that have > been

Re: Binary dependencies in source releases (Was: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC0)

cubation releases that have an issue here. No grace period, no voting, no discussion. Just fix it. That said, I'm not aware of us actually having such a release out there? How to deal with this stuff for TLPs that got it wrong, well, I guess that's a conversation for (a)

Re: Jena mentors (Was: [VOTE] Release Jena Fuseki 0.2.1-incubating)

On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Leo Simons wrote: >> Can we get 2 more IPMC votes? > > On a related note, who are currently mentoring Jena? The status page > [1] doesn't show. > > The Jena team page [2] lists y

Re: [VOTE] Release Jena Fuseki 0.2.1-incubating

good to me.) cheers, Leo On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Andy Seaborne wrote: > Hi, > > Here is a vote on a release for Jena Fuseki module, 0.2.1-incubating. This > RC-2 of this release. > > Please vote to approve this release: > >   [ ] +1 Approve the release >   [

Re: Thoughts on Incubator board reports

t I did do much more overseeing by following along than I would have done if, say, I had gotten nagged a couple thousand times more. So, definitely +1 to keep going like that, thanks for spelling it out too, you should know we got your back :) cheers, Leo [1] helped by others of course, yada y

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Accumulo to TLP

on it? That's fine, but I do hope your mentors stick around for a bit...it tends to help 'grease the wheels' during your transition to PMC. cheers, Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apach

Re: [VOTE] Release jena-tdb-0.9.0-incubating (RC-5)

On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 11:19 PM, Andy Seaborne wrote: > The Jena PPMC has voted to release > >  Apache Jena TDB 0.9.0-incubating > > and we would now be grateful if members of IPMC would review and vote for > this release. +1 from m

Re: [DISCUSS] - Packages renaming and backward compatibility (was: Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sqoop podling from Apache Incubator)

On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > Leo, are you out there? Hmm? Oh, this again... Having company names or trademarks in java namespaces is a pretty stupid convention. It gets us mess like this... There is no policy that incubating java projects must rename to use

Re: [VOTE] Release jena-tdb-0.9.0-incubating (RC-4)

tice until different rules arrive. 3) all looks good to me ;-) ) cheers, Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

small, reversible steps

r not) is worse. It divides a community that does not need to be divided, and it impedes consensus much more than needed. We won't get far that way. I'm glad I missed a week full of such e-mail while I was on holiday :-). I shall continue to try to steer clear of it! (hug), Le

Re: [VOTE] Release jena-tdb-0.9.0-incubating (RC2)

ow be grateful if members of IPMC would review and vote for >> this release. -1, specifically based on On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 1:22 PM, sebb wrote: > The tag and the packaging also need to be sorted out before release. Sorry, but it seems to me like you'll have to b

Re: February report review

+1 I'd also suggest that the below is a partial answer to the board's questions to the IPMC on how it would improve oversight so it should probably go in our report. cheers, Leo On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Sam Ruby wro

Re: [VOTE] Jukka Zitting for IPMC Chair (was Re: NOMINATIONS for Incubator PMC Chair)

+1 - Leo On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: > In the interest of moving the current discussion matters forward, please VOTE > on this recommendation to the board by the IPMC. I'll leave the VOTE open > for at least the next 72 hours: > > [

Re: Incubator, or "Incubation"?

to go skiing tomorrow I won't be around next week to participate in the details of all that. Have fun :-) cheerio, Leo [1] the choice of the vague term 'group' is intentional: give us some degrees of freedom to design the structure, in a formal *and* an informal sense. One kind

Re: [DISCUSSION] Regular rotation PMC chair

personal when people bring up rotating >> the chair - i.e. isn't the current chair doing a good enough >> job, the current chair should say they want to resign first, >> etc., rather than it just being time to allow the PMC to >> reevaluate itself > > +1 for option 2 and what Ralph said +1 cheers, Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [names] Public Review

> following it is a good idea. Hmm, so there's an interesting balance here, and it's probably overdue for some shifting. I think we do need to make clearer the MUSTs around trademarks to new projects, basically passing on the PMC responsibilities we've

Thoughts about reporting (was: Re: [RT] Community over policy...)

> process where I provide feedback here before providing feedback that > will ultimately be published on the ASF web site as a part of the ASF > board meetings. Thank you, Sam. I doubt I will beat you, though I may have a go :) cheers, Leo [1] these are imaginary quotes, no one sa

Re: [RT] Community over policy, and similar thoughts

ings, who then follow the rule. The feeling is very different and the dynamic is different: it has changed from "hmm, how should we tackle this" into "do what the rules say". This isn't bad per se (it's a good rule, probably), but I believe we do need to spend effort to c

[RT] Community over policy, and similar thoughts

. Unfortunately, heated debates have been happening here for a long time, with little break, and though I have something here that is not hot, it still needs contributing. So, sorry about the timing, but I'm posting it anyway Mwuhahah. Hah? cheers, Leo TL;DR [10][12] ==

Re: Q. Forks without concensus?; A. anytime / depends / never without agreement

t in those instances. You could say that the "fork me on github" (or just using github) is in fact inviting everyone to take as much change control as they want. cheers, Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: On Etch status

to prod board@ to see what they have to say on the matter? cheers, Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Bloodhound to join the Incubator

current page, but keep a link there to the version that was voted on, for clarity). All in all I think bloodhound should continue on, and the incubator PMC should trust the mentors to keep things on their current track (hehe) of collaboration-where-possible, rather than turn this into an overheated deb

Re: Forks without concensus?

laborative, consensus-based process)? Absolutely. Etc. So the generic policy is there is no generic policy, and instead there is appropriate application of judgement to specific cases. cheerio, Leo On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 6:35 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 1/3/2012 11:14 AM, Greg Stein wrote:

Re: [PROPOSAL] Flex for Apache Incubator

out of it or anything like that, I don't see any actual problem with the proposal. I can't say I'm enthusiastic about it, but I don't have to be. cheerio, Leo [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SWF#Licensing [2] http://www.adobe.com/devnet/swf.html [3] http:/

Re: [VOTE] Release jena-2.7.0-incubating (RC1)

*bump*. We have 2 +1s from mentors already, so at a minimum we need just one more binding vote to do this release. Anyone have time to do the review? thanks! Leo On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote: > Please vote on releasing the following as >  Apache Jena version

Re: [PROPOSAL] Flex for Apache Incubator

On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 9:20 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > I would like to propose Flex to be an Apache Incubator project. > > Here's a link to the proposal: > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/FlexProposal Pasted inline: = Apache Flex Proposal = == Abstract == Apache Flex is an application framework

Re: Any objections to git hosting for Incubator projects?

Also in S4, everyone agrees. It was discussed in the dev mailing list. -leo On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Ross Gardler wrote: > Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity. > On Dec 5, 2011 10:21 AM, "Mark Struberg" wrote: >> >> +1 for De

Re: Voting time period can be shortened ? (was: [VOTE] Release Kafka 0.7.0-incubating)

Yupyup. I thought I'd add a little background rant here, that I wrote for the jena podling a bit ago. Purely optional reading but maybe illuminating for some. cheerio, - Leo On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Leo Simons wrote: > On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Benson Margulies

Re: Git to SVN

about relying on a third party but for an organization powered by volunteers, using a free service like this could be a great benefit. Perhaps there are good reasons why this cannot be done but was wondering if it was discussed at all. -leo On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:

Re: Git to SVN

system perhaps we can just try it and help improve it. We all benefit. -leo On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 11:48 PM, Bruce Robbins wrote: > I am the fellow trying to convert the S4 git repository to SVN with > history preserved. I gave the following a whirl: > > http://code.google.com/p/

Re: [VOTE] S4 to join the Incubator

other ideas, that would be extremely valuable. thanks! -leo On Sep 28, 2011, at 12:36 PM, Sajeevan Achuthan wrote: > Hi Leo, > >I am Sajeevan , I am working for Ericsson, Ireland . I have 13 years of > experience in Java technologies and distributed computing. > We(Ericss

Re: [VOTE] S4 to join the Incubator

Thank you all for your support, looking forward to working with the Apache community. -leo On Sep 26, 2011, at 9:47 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > This passes, with 16 +1 votes, plenty of them binding, and no -1 votes. > > Thanks to all who voted! > > We can now get started creatin

Re: [PROPOSAL] S4 for the Apache Incubator

volunteer some time, start thinking on how to contribute. If the project is accepted we will discuss the details in the mailing list. Thanks again! -leo On Sep 15, 2011, at 5:54 PM, Phillip Rhodes wrote: > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Flavio Junqueira wrote: >> >> I have re

[PROPOSAL] S4 for the Apache Incubator

Dear all, I would like to propose S4 to be an Apache Incubator project. S4 is a distributed streaming platform written in Java. Here is a link to the proposal in the Incubator wiki: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/S4Proposal Thanks, Leo Neumeyer http://s4.io http://twitter.com/leoneu

[DISCUSS] how to add many committers to a new project (was: Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation)

xt after that you start adding in the people that have sent in CLAs and are wanting to touch the code/website/etc. That's what harmony did. It helped the project get into a mode of voting in new people frequently, and it also helped make visible to the project tha

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding > down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an > Apache Incubator project. +1 from me (binding). che

Re: [VOTE] Accept Sqoop for Incubation

+1! cheers, Leo On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:39 AM, arv...@cloudera.com wrote: > As there are no active discussions on the [PROPOSAL] thread for a few > days now, I will like to initiate the vote to accept Sqoop as an > Apache Incubator project. The proposal discussion thread and full

Re: [VOTE] Flume to join the Incubator.

+1 and welcome on board. cheers, Leo On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 5:38 AM, Jonathan Hsieh wrote: > [  ] +1 Accept Flume for incubation > [  ] +0 Indifferent to Flume incubation > [  ]  -1 Reject Flume for incubation ... > = Flume - A Distributed Log Collection System = > > == Abs

Re: A little OOo history

etty decent way to piss these people off :-D Incidentally, apache has decent mirroring mostly because it has its own share of beard stroking [1] uber experienced unix [2] administrators. They are typically referred to as the infra team, and they must also be kept happy and well-fed at all times! [3] c

OOo mirroring (was: Re: A little OOo history)

t is a _lot_ of work because the existing CGI scripts integrate into the download pages of every apache project. cheers, Leo PS: LibreOffice also uses mirrorbrain [5], having about 65 mirrors. They required only 15GB for a mirror though [6], not the OOo footprint 200GB. Sounds much more reason

Re: OpenOffice.org Apache Incubator Proposal: Splitting the Community?

ely fail to get excited about office applications (but welcome on board guys! Good luck! :-) ) but you're pretty obviously not done with some of the basics yet. The responsible vote AFAICS right now would be something like "-1, seems like a good idea, but the proposal is not finished, so p

Re: Setting up the Jena podling

On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > I'm a bit up to my eyes in OpenNLP. Can one of you get the initial > status page going? On it. - Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator

Re: I think individuals need SGAs

osely connected as you might think...so I think this really is something to run by legal-discuss / whoever designed the process (Roy?), people like me just regurgitate what they learned before :) cheerio, Leo On Dec 1, 2010, at 10:15 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > I've been thinking a

Re: Clarification about SGA versus CCLA

over-documenting how to actually use these documents -- in the end the documents themselves are pretty clear. cheerio! Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional comm

Re: [VOTE] Accept Jena into the incubator

+1 obviously! - Leo On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > +1 binding > > On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 10:17 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: >> Lacking a lot of binding votes... >> >> +1 binding >> >> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 9:10 PM, Ross

Re: [PROPOSAL] Whirr Project

is hot, go build community :) You do know any ASF member can sign up to be an incubator mentor, right? If I count correctly you have two on your list :) cheers, Leo -- = Whirr, a library of cloud services = == Abstract == Whirr will be a set of libraries for running cloud services

Re: [PROPOSAL] Zeta Components - Further comments?

like an interesting project to bring into the apache fold - some more PHP sounds like a good idea :) It looks like you now need to sign up some mentors after which your proposal would be ready for a vote. cheers, Leo

Re: [VOTE] Subversion podling for graduation

+1 - Leo On 2/12/10 4:08 AM, Greg Stein wrote: Hello all, I started a discussion thread a week-ish ago to seek out issues for Subversion's graduation. The couple bits that were raised[1] have been handled, I believe. So with that said, I am unaware of any potential showstoppers, and

Re: Discussion: graduating Subversion

uestion of graduation being asked means that all 'em boxes should in fact have been ticked by now. If so I say tick 'em and vote :) cheers, Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additio

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Shindig as an Apache Top Level Project

On 1/14/10 11:41 AM, Vincent Siveton wrote: I would like to start an official vote to recommend the graduation of Apache Shindig as a Top Level Project to the Board. +1! - Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr

The incubator is here to help projects

general@, please do take care to always get off your soap box first, and please always remember you are here to help them. If what you're going to say about a project won't help anyone, please do reconsider sending that e-mail. Just a friendly reminder... thanks for read

Re: [PROPOSAL] OpenCMIS incubator for Content Mangement Interoperability Services (CMIS)

plex discussion about the relationship between OpenCMIS and Chemistry. Keep at it! cheers, Leo [1] no, you really don't want me as a mentor [2], so don't ask :) [2] because I would offer you an opinion or two about CMIS and it'd all end in tears... --

Re: [PROPOSAL] Validation incubator for JSR-303 Bean Validation

list and object to some objections? :-D ciao... - Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: How documentation != code, and how to "do" policy (was: Re: Publishing api docs for Subversion)

m Copyright law perspective, you are right that code > and text is effectively the same thing, but that code has a common > tendency to be depending on other work, introducing licensing into the > legal mix. I think it was Leo who also pointed out that Trademarks is > an additional legal

Re: OSS Java AAC Decoder?

mails about such a topic together with one of google's laywers. It might be worth getting in touch with them... ...also it seems like java is actually quite fine for encoding/decoding of low-level high-bandwidth things like audio and video, as long as you stay

How documentation != code, and how to "do" policy (was: Re: Publishing api docs for Subversion)

lear rules can look pretty aggressive to the casual human. We have to let go of all that rigid thinking in order to make a reasonable policy that can be used by humans. I always look to creative commons for great examples of this. I.e. compare http://creativecommons.org/licenses/GPL/2.0/ to

Re: Question for mentors: crediting the original project?

as a company credit. As long as such statements are (a) true and (b) they don't interfere with sponsoring efforts. I think what's most important is to stick to facts and provide relevant information to users and (potential) contributors. I think a project's origin is relevant (though

Re: [VOTE] release Apache VCL 2.1

. "x.active = 1"; Another piece of suspect code would be in submitLogin() in authentication.php which does not appear to validate the $_POST['password']. I'm by no means a PHP expert so I might be making a fool of myself here, but better safe t

Re: JavaHL package namespace / migration / compatability

ine, good luck to them. Regardless of the stupidity of the rules (or the stupidity of breaking the rules), we as incubator should really not even try to enforce these kinds of standards; projects should make their own decisions about that. ciao, Leo -

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Pivot

On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Todd Volkert wrote: > The Apache Pivot community feels that it is ready to graduate into the > "Apache Pivot" top-level project. +1 from me! cheers, Leo - To unsubscribe,

Re: [Discussion] Graduation of Pivot Podling

Hey hey, I've checked in on Pivot now and again and reviewing recent activities, I think its definitely ready to leave the nest! I will be happy to vote +1 when it comes to a vote. cheers, Leo On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 3:10 AM, Todd Volkert wrote: > The feeling among the members of t

Re: Two other issues to discuss for Subversion

ar messaging on the relevant website(s). So, as long as y'all make sure to do that good stuff (be clear to users and protect the involved brands), I think what infrastructure goes where exactly, can be up to infra@, in this case. And y'all are talking to PRC

Re: Review-Then-Commit

er painful (if *I* were to do RTC I would definitely want to manage it within SVN perhaps with the aid of svnmerge.py), I don't think it is _wrong_. If the community really wants to do it that way, I say let them. Sorry Paul :) cheers, Leo PS: for the rec

Re: Insanity (of the release process)

On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 04:07, William A. Rowe, Jr. > wrote: >> Leo Simons wrote: >>> >>> Here's what I understand: >>> >>> 1) Apache rule: all apache releases must be made by PMCs >&

Re: Side Discussion; Mentorship [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Subversion

hat can't deal with that have other issues. In any case, a good way to offset any perceived risk is probably to have some lively discussion between the mentors and the rest of the incubator. So, risk mitigated, I say :) ciao, Leo --

Re: Insanity (of the release process)

On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 11:16, Leo Simons wrote: >>... >> Not merit, just "binding vote". I agree that it sucks, but it is not >> something where the incubator has "gone awry", it has _always_ been &g

Re: Insanity (of the release process)

On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Leo Simons wrote: >> Also, to be clear, as an IPMC member I spend quite a bit of time with >> projects where I am not a mentor, casting (binding) votes on things >> like their release

Re: Insanity. Apache Incubator should be about education (was: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Subversion)

n that :) > I believe it's reasonable to ask for the > trust that goes with ensuring that we'll be sure to keep Subversion in > line with Apache practices and procedures - and we will continue to do > so long after the Incubator has recommended Subversion for graduation. >  =)

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.0 (RC-5)

On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo wrote: > > Thanks Leo, your input is much appreciated. > > In addition to this +1, we received a +1 from Kevan Miller in the Wink > community vote. Is that vote transportable here? If so, then we just need one > more +1 to r

Re: Insanity. Apache Incubator should be about education (was: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Subversion)

s that using an argument based on authority is a good strategy? Not very good lessons either. Please kindly step off the soap box... Thanks, Leo PS: For the record I do agree that its not really necessary for subversion to do an incubation release. I like to think that kind of stuff is a judgemen

Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Subversion

On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 2:26 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 7:39 AM, Leo Simons wrote: >> PS: +1 to start incubation obviously. The record is 2 weeks set for >> MerlinDeveloper back in 2003...you have 9 days left to try and beat it Hey, you snipped the smile

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.0 (RC-5)

+1 from me! cheers, Leo On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Nicholas Gallardo wrote: > The Wink community has voted on and approved the release > of Wink 1.0 (RC-5).  We would now like to request the > approval of the Incubator PMC for this release. > > Details of the Wink commun

Re: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.2

+1, nice work folks! cheers, Leo On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Eric Evans wrote: > > The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache > Cassandra 0.4.2. We would now like to request the approval of the > Incubator PMC for this release. > > Cassandra is a

Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Subversion

the license details about the python bindings probably ought to belong in the LICENSE file not in the NOTICE file. On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 12:07 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > We're not ready for an alpha, but we could do an "internal" experimental > release. I seem to recall seeing

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.0

On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 9:23 PM, Bryant Luk wrote: > Thanks for the links.  One general comment I have is that I understand > this is part of the incubation process (and no offense intended to Leo > since obviously taking energy and time for this) but if I can't look > and se

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.0

arned about the existence of that clear rule): http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200909.mbox/%3cf767f0600909090615t6582bfd1m36e4d8abe1392...@mail.gmail.com%3e cheers, Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.0

ncluded library dependencies, and they should reproduce the exact text of those notices. For example, the slf4j notice line should not be there since slf4j does not require it. cheers, Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: genera

Re: [PROPOSAL] Libcloud Project

On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 6:59 AM, Paul Querna wrote: > I would like to propose incubating the existing Libcloud project to join the > ASF Cool! I will try to make the time to help out a little; I'm interested in this space :) c

Re: [VOTE] Accept Aries proposal for incubation

ns, and others) 3) I think the main issue is the sweeping statements in the proposal which is typical of java framework land, but in practice I suspect the actual project focus is pretty narrow, people just don't really know how to express that yet 4) given #3, I suspect that as the project

Re: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-rc2

On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Leo Simons wrote: > On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Eric Evans wrote: >> I'm curious though, when you say "...which makes me whinge just enough >> to not give a +1", is that hypothetical, or is there feedback that we >>

Re: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-rc2

, it means just fix your open jira eventually and lobby some other IPMC members for +1s...just I don't have more time to look at things atm to convince myself all is fine. ciao, - Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubsc

Re: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-rc2

va directory its pretty obvious what the story with them is, but CLILexer.java also misses a license header, which makes *me* whinge just enough to not give a +1, but that's also because I don't know much about the provenance of the codebase. Y

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5)

gine KEYS files are not policy). The thing that matters much more is linking up to the apache web of trust: http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html#web-of-trust For similar reasons it is also good if multiple people sign releases - more trust :) cheers, - Leo (who in java land al

Re: Review of cassandra NOTICE and LICENSE requested.

On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 10:44 AM, sebb wrote: > On 09/09/2009, Leo Simons wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 10:28 PM, sebb wrote: >> > Does the release actually *include* JUnit, or is that only used for >> > testing? >> > If so, then it should not be the i

Re: minimal NOTICE files (was: Re: Review of cassandra...)

On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Leo Simons wrote: > (dropped cassandra-dev) > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 10:44 AM, sebb wrote: >> On 09/09/2009, Leo Simons wrote: >>> Even if it is not in the release I believe there is nothing wrong with >>>  putting an acknowledg

minimal NOTICE files (was: Re: Review of cassandra...)

(dropped cassandra-dev) On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 10:44 AM, sebb wrote: > On 09/09/2009, Leo Simons wrote: >> Even if it is not in the release I believe there is nothing wrong with >>  putting an acknowledgment in the NOTICE file. (putting terms in the >>  LICENSE file tha

Re: Review of cassandra NOTICE and LICENSE requested.

ed in NOTICE if it is only > used at build-time. > It should not be in the binary release if it's not needed at run-time. Same comment -- it shouldn't hurt to have it in NOTICE. ciao, - Leo, who often gives credit to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Incubator Shindig version 1.1-BETA2

and license terms. Your use of the code for the these subcomponents is subject to the terms and conditions of the following licenses. but then there are no following licenses. Might as well remove that notice. etc/check_staged_release.sh in the source release has no license header. cheer

Re: [VOTE] Release Pivot 1.3 RC2

robably because we're setting an example as much as anything else. Rather than force the IPMC to make these judgment calls, please also err on the side of caution and fix things. (These discussions can also be difficult because there can be a dispute about what actually

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Aries incubator for Enterprise OSGi

ty in the end either. cheers, - Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Aries incubator for Enterprise OSGi

r overlap between the communities because we disagree on how to do things" then I'd like to see that clearly spelled out. cheers, - Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >