I've done a bit of evangelism on this topic:
https://blogs.apache.org/comdev/entry/an-approach-to-community-building
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3409SA-QpdE (Apache@Google summit. You were
there, but here's a vid)
My favorite highlights (maybe from the above but not sure if I said it
explici
+1 (binding)
Kenn
On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 5:45 PM Gian Merlino wrote:
> Thanks everyone for voting! It has been over 72 hours, so I will post a
> result thread shortly.
>
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 7:54 AM Makoto Yui wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Makoto
> >
> > 2019年12月10日(火) 6:39 Julian Hy
+1
On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 2:08 PM Paul King wrote:
> +1 to join Apache Geronimo
>
> On Fri., 6 Dec. 2019, 5:51 pm Romain Manni-Bucau,
> wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > BatchEE community voted to leave the incubator to join Apache Geronimo
> as a
> > subproject.
> >
> > Here is the vote threa
- Incubating in name
> > - DISCLAIMER exists
> > - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine
> > - No unexpected binary files
> > - Checked PGP signatures
> > - Checked Checksums
> > - Code compiles and tests successfully run
> >
> >- D
der the MIT
> > license.
> > Once we are moving to the Incubator, we would do a complete check of all
> > transitive dependencies. We don't expect any surprises here.
> >
> > === Cryptography ===
> > (not applicable)
> >
> > === Required Resources ===
got access to the wiki, afterwards I'll
> also start a separate DISCUSS thread to discuss our proposal.
> >
> > Dominik
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Kenneth Knowles
> > Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2019 1:49 AM
> > To: general
>
+1 (binding)
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 8:07 PM Goson zhang wrote:
>+1（non-binding）
>
> 发件人： David Nalley
> Date: 2019年10月30日周三 上午9:48
> Subject: [VOTE] Accept TubeMQ into the Apache Incubator
> To:
>
>
> Hi folks,
>
> The [DISCUSS] thread on TubeMQ has died down.
>
> Accordingly, I would lik
Cool!
I see you have mentors lined up. I would love to also be involved as mentor.
The list of initial committers seems a little small. Browsing the commit
history it does seem to be dominated by just a couple of contributors. I
see this is acknowledged (at least implicitly) in the proposal. I ex
+1
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 8:49 AM Dave Fisher wrote:
> +1 as the Incubator story is better explained here[2].
>
> The master is here [3]
>
> Regards,
> Dave
>
> [2] https://incubator.apache.org/guides/participation.html
> [3] http://www.apache.org/dev/
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Oct 18, 2
Signature and Checksum
> >NOTICE - there needs to be a slight adjustment - see below:
> >LICENSE - there could be better separation between each license
> >DISCLAIMER-WIP
> >Ran mvn build and tests
> >
> > Minor Notes:
&g
I will retract my -1. I need not speak for the others in this thread.
If the other IPMC member found and looked at RC2 then by all means proceed.
I had guessed that confirming this fact was equivalent to a replacement
vote. If not, great!
Kenn
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 8:31 PM leerho wrote:
> RE
uild lifecycle.
> >
> > If you are running just "mvn test" or even "mvn install" that plugin
> > should not be called.
> >
> > I don't have that problem.
> >
> > Lee.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 1
+1 I like this document.
I expect the way one reaches a point where they don't need the proposed
document is by doing a lot of mentoring. So you can't wait until they've
already done a lot of mentoring before you start them mentoring :-). It is
true that the starter examples are the ones that many
+1
Triple-checked: LICENSE, DISCLAIMER, license headers, mvn test
I did have to run `mvn -Dmaven.gitcommitid.skip test` since it is looking
for a .git directory.
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 9:04 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> I checked:
> - incubating in name
> - signatures and
OK. No -1 votes, so this IP clearance vote passes by lazy consensus. Thanks!
Kenn
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 8:21 PM Kenneth Knowles wrote:
> Yes, apologies. Copy/paste error. Thanks for catching & finding the right
> link.
>
> Kenn
>
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 2:57 PM Julia
+1
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 11:34 AM Furkan KAMACI
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Definitely +1!
>
> Kind Regards,
> Furkan KAMACI
>
> 14 Ağu 2019 Çar, saat 19:35 tarihinde Luciano Resende >
> şunu yazdı:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 11:41 PM Zhijie Shen wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Aft
> On Aug 13, 2019, at 2:07 PM, Kenneth Knowles wrote:
> >
> > Apache Beam has received a code donation of a ZetaSQL Translator
> >
> > The IP clearance document is at
> > http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/beam-zetasql-translator.html
> >
>
Apache Beam has received a code donation of a ZetaSQL Translator
The IP clearance document is at
http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/beam-zetasql-translator.html
The pull request is https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/6561/
Please review in the next 72 hours, then IP clearance will proceed
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 3:26 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I will also note that if the IPMC switches to *voting* Members into the
> > IPMC, that the Apache Member will be observing that vote take place on
> > private@ through a subscription (they can reply!) or via the archives. …
>
> Whi
+1 and I do like the new text.
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 9:43 PM Kevin A. McGrail
wrote:
> +1
> --
> Kevin A. McGrail
> Member, Apache Software Foundation
> Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
> https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 9:54 AM Jim Ja
Signed off datasketches.
Kenn
On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 3:32 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I’ve submitted the incubator board report for this month.
>
> These podling reports are still missing sign off:
> - BatchEE
> - DataSketches
> - DLab
>
> They will be asked to report next month if they
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 8:31 AM Ralph Goers
wrote:
> Placing the disclaimer on the project’s site and labeling the release as
> incubating is done so that downstream users are aware the release may be be
> up to ASF standards.
>
"may *not* be up to ASF standards" ?
Kenn
> If we required that p
I could not find the disclaimer from
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/branding.html#disclaimers anywhere in
the release.
Kenn
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 11:47 AM Antoine Toulme wrote:
> Hello IPMC,
>
> The Apache Tuweni community has voted on and approved a proposal to
> release Apache Tuweni (i
Thanks for this. The steps are very clear and I like the addition of
repository clearance.
Kenn
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 12:52 PM Chris Lambertus wrote:
>
>
> > On May 15, 2019, at 12:10 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> >
> > Hi -
> >
> > I think that we are mixing together a few events in a podling's
+1
*From: *Justin Mclean
*Date: *Tue, May 14, 2019 at 1:38 AM
*To: *
Hi,
>
> +1 from me much clearer
>
> Justin
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general
+d...@datasketches.apache.org
A logo was submitted alongside the SGA. Would using this logo be
acceptable? I don't have experience with this (just doc reading and my
working knowledge of ASF) since Beam was a merger that was extremely
distinct from its pre-Apache existence.
Kenn
*From: *Justin
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On May 13, 2019, at 12:24 PM, Kenneth Knowles wrote:
> >
> > Hi incubator,
> >
> > I am mentoring Datasketches and I am not clear on the I.P. clearance
> > process for new podlings. We have a collection of filed ICLAs and SGA.
&g
Hi incubator,
I am mentoring Datasketches and I am not clear on the I.P. clearance
process for new podlings. We have a collection of filed ICLAs and SGA. What
do I do now?
Here are the resources I know of and have tried to incorporate into doing
my own homework:
http://incubator.apache.org/guide
*From: *Justin Mclean
*Date: *Fri, May 10, 2019 at 12:36 AM
*To: *
No one should be subscribed to the private list other than mentors, PPMC
> members and ASF members (who can subscribe to any private list).
>
Ah, my analysis does not include ASF members who are neither PPMC nor
mentors.
Kenn
(minus dev@tuweni and plus dev@datasketches)
Thanks for compiling this. If it was manual, that is heroic.
Writing with my datasketches mentor hat on:
- 3 mentors
- 7 non-mentor PPMC
So there's 10
- whimsy indicates private@ has 8 subscribers which implies 2 not
subscribed
- whimsy indicate
Hi all,
I found a thread from 2015 that implied you could use reporter.apache.org
for a podling, and indeed Beam's podling reports were right along those
lines. I may just be very bad at user interfaces, but I can't figure out
how to generate a draft report for a podling. Is it possible?
Kenn
scuss
DataSketches on general@incubator.apache.org is done. So if you are
interested, please subscribe to d...@datasketches.apache.org.
Kenn
On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 8:18 AM Dave Fisher wrote:
>
>
> > On Apr 2, 2019, at 8:39 PM, Kenneth Knowles wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> &g
I have filed the first two steps in the parent ticket here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-18195
On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 8:31 AM Dave Fisher wrote:
> Hi -
>
> > On Apr 9, 2019, at 8:26 AM, leerho wrote:
> >
> > Folks,
> > • I notice that DataSketches name search has been up fo
On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 6:35 AM James Bognar wrote:
> My $.02.
>
> Apache is sorely in need of a portal similar to StackOverflow. I,
> like many other software developers, primarily use Google for finding
> answers. 90% of the time those answers are going to be found on
> StackOverflow. Answers
Hi all,
I have added DataSketches to podlings.xml with help from Dave Fisher [1].
The name search is underway, credit to Lee Rhodes [2].
Next steps as I understand them are to set up:
- podling status page
- DNS
- LDAP
- web site
- mailing lists
- git repo
I am not confident o
Thanks Dave! And thanks for updating in SVN too.
Kenn
On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 9:58 AM Dave Fisher wrote:
> Hi -
>
> > On Mar 30, 2019, at 11:41 PM, Kenneth Knowles wrote:
> >
> > Hi Dave,
> >
> > What should a podling put here? I notice a few things:
>
Hi Dave,
What should a podling put here? I notice a few things:
- you changed the start date from Feb 25 (date of the vote passing) to
March 25 (date of the commit)
- reporting group is left as 2
- the first monthly report is May, two months after the new incubation
start month
I don't know e
The vote is passed to accept into the incubator. Since there is a cost to
changing the name once infrastructure is set up, I suggest doing the name
search immediately. There seemed to be some consensus to try to keep the
DataSketches name. If there are no objections, I will file a
PODLINGNAMESEARCH
-Baptiste Onofré
- Felix Cheung
- Willem Jiang
- Liang Chen
- Paul King
- Sheng Wu
- Thomas Weise
- Sebastian Schelter
- Von Gosling
- Mohammad Asif Siddiqui
- Kenneth Knowles
Non-binding:
- Neelesh Salian
- Julian Feinauer
- Brahma Reddy Battula
DataSketches is accepted into the
+1 (binding)
On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 11:59 PM Mohammad Asif Siddiqui <
asifdxtr...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Regards
> Asif
>
> On 2019/03/14 21:23:24, Kenneth Knowles wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We've discussed the proposal for t
Indeed, http://nemo.apache.org/
So I looked for similar ideas and came to Outis [2] via [1].
Kenn
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Captain_Nemo#Etymology
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outis
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 11:27 AM Anu Engineer
wrote:
> At this point you should call it “Apache Ne
Hi all,
We've discussed the proposal for the DataSketches project in [1] and [2].
The
proposal itself has been put on the wiki [3].
Per incubator rules [4] I'd like to call a vote to accept the new
"DataSketches" project as a podling in the Apache Incubator.
A vote for accepting a new Apache Inc
That's a lot of dev lists on one thread. Adding a couple more... :-)
Kenn
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 7:17 PM Dave Fisher wrote:
>
>
> > On Mar 12, 2019, at 7:01 PM, Huxing Zhang wrote:
> >
> > Hi Dave,
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 2:14 AM Dave Fisher
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi -
> >>
> >> Looks pr
+1 for #4 noop, at least until there's evidence of a problem.
Kenn
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 6:27 PM Woonsan Ko wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 6:33 PM Justin Mclean
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > It’s been suggested that the IPMC is too large, what do other IPMC
> members think might be a way to a
Thanks!
On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 1:01 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> HI,
>
> > May I have write access to the incubator wiki? My username is `kenn`.
>
> You’ve been added.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-
Hello!
May I have write access to the incubator wiki? My username is `kenn`.
Kenn
; On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 7:37 PM Kenneth Knowles wrote:
>
> > Sounds good to me. I read it one more time. My comments should not be
> seen
> > as blocking comments, but just commentary and curiosity.
> >
> > Do you have a Wiki account?
> > https://wiki.apache.org/inc
Sounds good to me. I read it one more time. My comments should not be seen
as blocking comments, but just commentary and curiosity.
Do you have a Wiki account?
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ProjectProposals
Kenn
On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 4:58 PM lee...@gmail.com wrote:
> This draft proposal h
+1 to Bava
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 2:11 PM Antoine Toulme wrote:
> +1 for Bava. Checking usage now.
>
> https://github.com/search?o=desc&q=bava
> No repo using the name or active. Most repos hobbyists.
>
> Google code:
> https://opensource.google.com/projects/search?q=bava
> No hits
>
> Sourcefo
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 12:26 PM Kevin A. McGrail
wrote:
> On 2/28/2019 3:24 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> >>
> >> It also seems to imply that usage of the name rainbow would somehow
> >> be offensive or insensitive. Again, I'm not sure how. Nor am I aware
> >> of situations where the LGBT+ community
>
> Regards
> Liang
>
>
> Kenneth Knowles wrote
> > I could not access that document. I suggest you need to turn on link
> > sharing.
> >
> > Kenn
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 12:00 PM
>
> > leerho@
>
> > <
I searched for "Jal" and came up with Japan Air Lines, which is clearly a
really different field of use.
I also found the Wikipedia article on JAL but was hasty in presuming it
described a historical language. If it is an active open source project,
let's not collide.
So I'll change my vote to "W
Done. Sorry for that oversight.
Kenn
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 10:01 PM lee...@gmail.com wrote:
> As primary author, can I be given the ability to directly edit?
> On 2019/02/26 05:37:22, Kenneth Knowles wrote:
> > It isn't too much work, so I've done it:
> > https
> > general@incubator.apache.org may not work. Nonetheless, several
> > > individuals were able to request access using their individual email
> > > accounts and I was able to add them. I will try to add you using
> > > k...@apache.org, but if that doesn't
5:55:50, leerho wrote:
> > Yes I will try that tomorrow.
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 7:34 PM Kenneth Knowles wrote:
> >
> > > Can you share the Google doc with the proposal? Per Ted's advice, we
> can
> > > iterate quickly there
+1 for Jal
Took a look around the web and didn't see anything to worry about.
It already sounds like an Apache project name :-)
Kenn
On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 12:20 AM Pierre Smits
wrote:
> +1 for 'Jal'
>
> Nice sounding, different, short.
> .
>
> Best regards,
>
> Pierre Smits
>
> *Apache Traf
app! I
> could use a lot of help getting this off the ground! Also, I'm not sure
> that Mr. Chen and Mr. Onofré have fully accepted taking this on :)
>
> Lee.
>
> On 2019/02/23 06:03:58, Kenneth Knowles wrote:
> > Nice.
> >
> > I would very much like to he
ic Google
> Groups forum/sketches-user for issue tracking and discussions. We will
> migrate and combine from these two sources to the Apache JIRA.
>
> Proposed Jira ID: DATASKETCHES
>
> == Initial Committers ==
>
> The following list of individuals have been extreme
The subject line has me interested already. Follow examples like this maybe?
1.
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/a5db74cc9e5ae89b3bfa5f4b07bfcc18dae84b7098232fb897cd47b7@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
2.
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/5a7f6a218b11a1cac61fbd53f4c995fd7716f8ad3751cf9f1
I think Kava is enough of a conflict that it will need to change,
eventually. I think it is OK to keep it as Cava for entry into the
incubator since it already exists but change ASAP:
- Talk about "Apache Cava (incubating)" will not build the new project's
reputation as well (for example, I actua
+1 (binding)
Looking forward to this.
On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 11:11 AM Woonsan Ko wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Cool!
>
> Woonsan
>
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 2:58 AM Lars Francke
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > we've discussed the proposal for the Training project in [1] and [2]. The
> > pro
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-438
:-)
Kenn
On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 1:06 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > It sounds like httpd has the same problem since some of these listed
> > “releases” are failed vote attempts (and so not official releases)
>
> Yep it is and to try and
+1
I would like to volunteer as an additional mentor.
Kenn
On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 2:57 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Nice proposal. Just a couple of comments.
>
> > The project is well established and counts 2 active committers. Some
> contributions were made from the community.
>
> Being
Hi Lars,
I would like to be a part of this too, according to your & the others' best
judgment. I'm PMC at Beam & incubator. I'm not a professional teacher or
trainer, but I have been a part of preparing and delivering a number of
trainings and talks (also the usual teaching, tutoring, talking in
Hi,
I'm a bit late as it seems there is great mentorship on this project
already, but I'd be interested in helping as a mentor, too, if it becomes
useful.
Kenn
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 3:20 PM Thomas Weise wrote:
> I will start the VOTE in a day or two if there are no further comments.
>
>
> On
+1
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 9:38 AM Felix Cheung wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 3:20 AM Suneel Marthi
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> > > On Jan 13, 2019, at 5:34 PM, Thomas Weise wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Following the discussion of the Hudi proposal
+1 (non-binding)
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 9:57 AM Michael Wall wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 3:03 AM Olivier Lamy wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 at 03:07, Ryan Blue wrote:
> >
> > > The discuss thread seems to have reached consensus, so I propose
> > accepting
>
I like this. I had the (apparently accurate) impression that ASF membership
was the usual route to podling mentorship. I'm very interested in
mentorship generally and ways I can help out ASF - so they might someday
intersect in the formal role of podling mentor. It is nice to see a path
that is not
OK, considered reviewed by lazy consensus. Thanks!
Kenn
On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 8:54 AM Kenneth Knowles wrote:
> Apache Beam has received a code donation of the Euphoria API from
> Seznam.cz, a.s. [1] at https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/6601
>
> The IP clearance paperwork
Apache Beam has received a code donation of the Euphoria API from
Seznam.cz, a.s. [1] at https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/6601
The IP clearance paperwork is ready for review, via a lazy consensus
majority vote, per the IP clearance process [2], open for at least 72 hours.
Thanks!
Kenn
[1] ht
I found that before, so no trouble with discoverability. Reading it again
gives me a clearer idea.
Thanks!
Kenn
On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 6:01 AM Shane Curcuru wrote:
> Kenneth Knowles wrote on 10/10/18 11:13 PM:
> > Hello!
> >
> > Apache Beam [1] is welcoming a donation [2
Hello!
Apache Beam [1] is welcoming a donation [2] of the Euphoria DSL [3]. As PMC
chair I am doing IP clearance. I would like advice on the process for a
name/trademark search for a subproject like this. Is this the right venue
to ask? Can anyone give me a pointer?
Kenn (Beam PMC Chair)
[1] htt
OK, considered reviewed by lazy consensus. Thanks!
Kenn
On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 3:47 PM Kenneth Knowles wrote:
> Apache Beam has received a code donation of the Dataflow Java Worker from
> Google [1] at https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/6561/
>
> The IP clearance paperwork is read
Apache Beam has received a code donation of the Dataflow Java Worker from
Google [1] at https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/6561/
The IP clearance paperwork is ready for review, via a lazy consensus
majority vote, per the IP clearance process [2], open for at least 72 hours.
Thanks!
Kenn
[1] ht
74 matches
Mail list logo
