On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Roman Shaposhnik
wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 7:43 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> wrote:
> >
> > If someone wants to write a "12 steps to becoming an Apache top-level
> > project" that might become the single-page Incubator website ;-)
>
> Isn't it 1 step nowaday
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Roman Shaposhnik
wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 8:36 AM, Christian Grobmeier
> wrote:
> > Not saying anything on the proposal itself, I would be concerned because
> > of the name Silk.
> > There is this:
> > http://lucidworks.com/product/integrations/silk/
> >
Knit, crochet, macrame?
Though, honestly, pulling lower-level components together into higher-level
ones sounds a little like granny squares...
Don
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 1:53 AM, Andreas Neumann wrote:
> Pardon my ignorance, I just looked it up and realized that warp and weft
> are indeed r
Hi Dave...
So Aurora already exists as a functioning package? Is there a
public-accessible project page for it somewhere?
Don
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Dave Lester wrote:
> Hi Jean-Baptiste,
>
> The focus is currently on Mesos. Our intent is to make it a sub-project.
>
> Dave
>
> On Mo
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> 2) Apache has been around long enough and is large enough to have its own
> culture, with its own societal rules and tribal history. Lots of it is
> written down, but it is hard to find.
I never thought of that...Apache policy is the writt
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Jordan Zimmerman
wrote:
> It will be an official transfer. Apache will get all the code and the name
> Curator.
>
> -JZ
>
> On Feb 26, 2013, at 12:31 PM, Donald Whytock wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 8:14 PM, Jordan Zimmerman
&
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 8:14 PM, Jordan Zimmerman
wrote:
> == Source and Intellectual Property Submission Plan ==
>
> * The initial source is already licensed under the Apache License, Version
> 2.0. https://github.com/Netflix/curator/blob/master/LICENSE.txt
So this is effectively a fork of the
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Franklin, Matthew B.
wrote:
> Apache Streams Proposal
>
> == Proposal ==
>
> Apache Streams will bring together individuals who are or are looking to
> increase and centralize the production, consumption and federation of
> ActivityStreams throughout enterprise org
Just giving a post-hurricane nudge.
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi all guys,
>
> I prepared a new proposal[1] for the incubator, concerning the
> creation of a new community focused on all aspects of Google Guice
> extensions, starting from a rather than small codeba
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Ross Gardler
wrote:
>
> Under "reliance on salaried developers" the proposal states "At
> present, almost all development on Allura is done on salaried time. It
> is understood that expanding the developer community to the point
> where this is not the case, is a g
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 6:43 AM, Edgar Felipe Fuentes Perea
> wrote:
>> Hi, where can I find the source code for this Project?
>>
>> Thank you in advance for your help.
>
> Information about Hise, including the source code URL is available a
Hi Pei,
A lot of the components listed in the proposal and the Wikipedia entry
look useful for general natural language processing, not just
clinical-data processing. Is it possible to use cTAKES for general,
non-clinical processing? Or is it built on a general core with
clinical-data-related ex
The MapReduce link in the proposal doesn't resolve. You perhaps want
to use "http://hadoop.apache.org/mapreduce/"; instead.
Don
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:06 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Donald Whytock wrote:
>> Plan"...What do the patents cover/restrict? Is a patent even
>> compatible with ALv2?
>>
>
> Speaking only for myself, Section 3 of ALv2 seems to addres
Regarding the section "Source and Intellectual Property Submission
Plan"...What do the patents cover/restrict? Is a patent even
compatible with ALv2?
Don
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For add
>From the article: "CloudStack brings to Apache more than 30,000
community members, thousands of certified apps, and hundreds of
production clouds".
And to think, people were worried about OpenOffice...
Don
-
To unsubscribe, e-m
Isn't there also something along the lines of what's called "culpable
deniability"? Since podlings may be in states where their offerings
might not be as legal as TLPs (licensing issues, trademark/branding
issues, etc.), is it not more convenient for them to be relegated to
an area specifically de
May I suggest bumping thoughts of cashiering the incubator to its own
thread? It seems a much bigger question than whether to prevent
vetoes on PPMC membership votes.
Don
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 6:21 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 1/31/2012 5:05 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
>>
>> In
Fair enough. I used to run into this in high school, where something
that had been done the year before a freshman came in was suddenly a
tradition that had to be done every year. You could probably compare
it to Terry Pratchett's senior mayfly ("It's way too bright around
here now. Not like it
Like Apache, But Sexier...LABS? I can totally see that. Anyone want
to start an Apache LABS podling?
I'm speaking as someone who lurks on a few prodling lists, plus the
incubator. There's stuff I've picked up sort of by osmosis (absorbing
through membranes and the skin, rather like how one lear
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 2:49 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wrote:
>
> It is not helpful to have a number of directors contradicting each
> other on general@, never coming to consensus. In fact, its maddening.
I'm actually not seeing much in the way of contradiction in discussion
of the policy.
The le
It occurs to me that the ASF, in enforcing open-source licensing,
becomes a source of free legal advice to the open-source community,
whether it intends to or not...
1. Contribute a body of code to ASF.
2. "Is it legal for us to accept this? Better run it past legal@."
3. Use acceptance of the
A minor comment on one sentence...
"To that end, Adobe will only have minority representation on the
initial committers list."
As I understand it, companies don't have representation in Apache
projects. Individuals do, that may or may not belong to a given
company, and that may or may not be ope
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> I can see two problems with this view to begin with. One is IP
> management. The more people participate in a project and the longer
> they do so, the messier it becomes to track provenance and get ICLAs
> from all of the contributors. One
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 5:32 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> You use the phrase "committ rights" in this template. They are not
> "rights" they are "privileges". The reason this might be important is
> that very occasionally it is necessary for a PMC to remove these
> privileges, it is one of the few blu
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 6:06 AM, sebb wrote:
> In some cases, a URL might be relevant for retired projects; this
> could be added as an attribute of the tag
Is it at all possible that a current podling would have a nonstandard URL?
I'm wondering if the URL attribute should be at the podling lev
nd/or graduated podlings? Something that can be changed
manually?
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:19 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 13 October 2011 16:00, Donald Whytock wrote:
>> So...a url attribute that takes precedence when present, otherwise the
>> link is derived from the podling name? Or shou
So...a url attribute that takes precedence when present, otherwise the
link is derived from the podling name? Or should the url attribute be
default-filled for all cases?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.ap
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 10:50 AM, sebb wrote:
> If it's important to have a single page that contains all the podling
> names ever used for searching purposes, then we could create a
> simplified version of podlings.xml, with links to more detailed
> entries.
Does it make sense for the details su
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> There is always:
> http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#ooo
This isn't necessarily the same as the members of the PPMC, is it?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
There's been talk on the OpenOffice dev list about a public list of
PPMC members. Now that there's an overall podlings.xml registery,
should there perhaps be a standard for something similar at the
podling level, that a general script can use if it's there? Perhaps
something along the lines of
in
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> Ok, for you. Not me. I believe people coming from outside are confused
> by this navigation too. Of course I cannot prove it, but all the
> website I like have easier navigation.
So what's the use case for the RHS column? Presumably
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 9:08 PM, sebb wrote:
> It would be easier to edit and navigate if the attributes were all on
> the same line as the tag
Yeah, that's the plan. I was just listing what attributes would be
there. I format the final file using XPontus. I forgot sponsor, BTW;
that'll be in
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 6:48 PM, sebb wrote:
> I'm now thinking it might be better to convert some of the tags to
> attributes, for example:
>
>
>
> These are all relatively short fields and I think it would make the
> file shorter and easier to read.
> I used "resource" rather than "id" becaus
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 5:10 PM, sebb wrote:
> However I think it would make sense to sort the entries by podling
> name, rather than by name within status.
> Otherwise it will be a pain when the status changes.
>
> Also, rather than use a tag, I think it would be better to
> use a tag which is th
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 6:46 AM, sebb wrote:
> The registry would contain all podling names (current and previous)
> together with state (active, dormant, graduated, retired) and other
> basic information.
> This would be used to generate the podling summary page(s) as well.
Would said XML file th
What about storing the podling names in a table somewhere and using a
Javascript fragment to read the table and populate the right-column
list? Pages that include the script therefore don't have to be
updated at all when the podling list changes.
Don
-
Apologies...shouldn't have cited [6]. Meant to cite [2]:
[2] http://www.apache.org/licenses/software-grant.txt
Good thing IANAL.
Don
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Donald Whytock wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 5:27 AM, Sander van der Waal
> wrote:
>> On the other hand
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 5:27 AM, Sander van der Waal
wrote:
> On the other hand, the ASF general FAQ states that the copyright of ASF
> projects is owned by the ASF, more specifically "The members own the
> code" [5]. Also the IP Clearance template [6] has a check that says
> "Check and make sure
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Gavin McDonald wrote:
> Are we to keep on creating new committer accts for these folks knowing damn
> well
> that at the end of the term they disappear and a new lot appears? This is why
> they (
> when they did commit) shared accounts.
What if the students all s
Should there be a way to comment on the dormant podling? Perhaps
analysis on what (over and above community, the core problem) would be
required to make the project viable, in case anyone who has the time
and interest and expertise (i.e. someone other than, say, me) wanted
to try to revive it?
Do
What happens to a dormant podling? Are its files still accessible,
and does its licensing still apply?
Don
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 7:38 AM, Bernd Fondermann
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 16:15, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>>> We can
+1 (non-binding)
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Yegor Kozlov wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>> *** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
>>
>> As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding
>> down, I wou
Considering the code was owned by Oracle, would Oracle and IBM have
slugged out any IP issues between them before now?
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message
>> From: Simon Phipps
>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>> Sent: Thu, June 9, 2011 12:46
Is that a copyleft swallow or an ALv2 swallow?
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> On Jun 7, 2011, at 2:43 PM, Simos Xenitellis wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> Guys, if we are going to argue over the mistakes of the pasts
>>> and the slig
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> According to Markmail (http://openoffice.markmail.org/) the following
> 37 openoffice.org mailing lists received more than 365 messages in
> 2010:
Based on the volume here over the last week, how many of those lists
got all 365 messages in on
Actually, "land-grab" isn't an invalid analogy. Think of a
mountain...Imagine some enterprising nonprof manages to buy a scenic
mountain. A cadre of volunteers sees to it, cleaning up litter and
the occasional forest fire. The nonprof opens up the mountain for
anyone to go play on, as long as th
The butler did it.
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Guys, if we are going to argue over the mistakes of the pasts
> and the slights of the past, quite frankly, we aren't going to
> get very far.
>
> This is supposed to be a happy occasion; let's not bicker
> and argue about
Perhaps db.apache.org would be a better example? Should there be a
semantic.apache.org?
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> Hi Ian,
>
> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Ian Dickinson wrote:
>> ...Bertrand wrote:
>>...
2. A Semantic Commons area is created for commo
Are there plans for NPanday to work with other .NET IDEs, such as
SharpDevelop (www.sharpdevelop.net)?
Don
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 7:12 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> sounds good.
>
> A minor question: do you plan to graduate under the umbrella of the Maven TLP
> or
> becoming an own TLP?
>
> LieGr
:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 22:23, Donald Whytock wrote:
>> Sorry to leave things on a sour note...had family in from college.
>>
>> Do we want to take this off-channel to discuss details?
>
> Preferrably - no. Let&
Sorry to leave things on a sour note...had family in from college.
Do we want to take this off-channel to discuss details?
Don
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Bernd Fondermann
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 16:23, Donald Whytock wrote:
>> So I gather that's a "no"
So I gather that's a "no" on mentoring.
Any other takers?
Don
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 3:36 AM, Bernd Fondermann
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 00:06, Donald Whytock wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 4:10 AM, Bernd Fondermann
>> wrote:
>>> So, what are yo
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 4:10 AM, Bernd Fondermann
wrote:
> So, what are your short term goals with chatterbot? As you are on the
> incubator list and put up a proposal, the goal should be to become an
> Incubator project. Otherwise, we are just wasting time here.
> An important part of preparing fo
43 PM, Donald Whytock wrote:
> Well, it seemed presumptuous to ask about mentors when I hardly had a
> community...but thank you for your consideration. Yes, mentoring
> would be appreciated.
>
> I tested my XMPP handler against two servers: Google's chat server and
> one ma
nt
> lib like Smack?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bernd
>
> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 12:54, Donald Whytock wrote:
>> Hello again...
>>
>> Following is the revised proposal text, as posted on the wiki.
>> Significant changes are the goals, which now focus on building th
nal server-based or enterprise architecture; however, it is
recognized that tried-and-tested principles established in enterprise
architecture may be applicable here.
Core Developers:
As of late 2009, there is one developer, Donald Whytock (dwhytock at
gmail dot com). Donald Whytock has severa
al key.
So where do I go from here? A new proposal draft?
Don
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Richard S. Hall wrote:
> On 1/29/10 10:38, Donald Whytock wrote:
>>
>> I have an overview of the current Chatterbot architecture at
>>
>> http://www.imtower.net/chat
uestion, is there any Java API standard abstraction for
> chat protocols? e.g. javax.chat? I don't think there is but there is of
> course JMS, is ChatterBot significantly different from JMS? If so, perhaps
> a low priority side goal of the project should be to develop a stand
ecifically as an alternative to
traditional server-based or enterprise architecture; however, it is
recognized that tried-and-tested principles established in enterprise
architecture may be applicable here.
Core Developers
As of late 2009, there is one developer, Donald Whytock (dwhytock at
gma
orks, I'll be happy to do it that way.
Don
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 9:05 PM, David Crossley wrote:
> Donald Whytock wrote:
> >
> > I have a personal project that I would like to make OpenSource and submit
> to
> > the ASF. It is a small framework for chat responders,
http://lists.imtower.net/listinfo.cgi/chatterbot-imtower.net
Seeking interested contributors, potential mentors, and, perhaps most
important, peer review.
Thanks...
Donald Whytock
62 matches
Mail list logo
