On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 6:06 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > In some cases, a URL might be relevant for retired projects; this > could be added as an attribute of the <foo> tag
Is it at all possible that a current podling would have a nonstandard URL? I'm wondering if the URL attribute should be at the podling level, where it could, if needed, be used for current projects as well as non-current ones. Don --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org