Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Accept BifroMQ into the Apache Incubator

Cool.. Congrats. You might want to think about submitting a talk to the community over code NA iiot track... However, be fast, that closes today. Chris Gesendet von Outlook für Android From: Willem Jiang Sent: Monday, April 21, 2025 3:16:

AW: [VOTE] Accept BifroMQ into the Apache Incubator

+1 (IPMC) Chris Von: Willem Jiang Datum: Freitag, 11. April 2025 um 08:34 An: Incubator General Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Accept BifroMQ into the Apache Incubator My +1 (binding) Willem Jiang On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 11:37 AM Willem Jiang wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I want to call a VOTE to acce

AW: [DISCUSS] BifroMQ Proposal

@incubator.apache.org Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] BifroMQ Proposal Hi Chris, On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 6:53 PM Christofer Dutz wrote: > Hi, > > I wasn’t meaning this as a general accusation. I was more just reporting a > pattern I have been seeing in the projects I’m … or was … involved in. >

AW: [DISCUSS] BifroMQ Proposal

ting > cut off later, and we have related several threads on board@ to > discuss the pattern, no matter what other tags it may have. But I'd > suggest we avoid a tag that may create a scarecrow or suddenly blame > unrelated projects. > > Best, > tison. > > Willem Jiang

AW: [DISCUSS] BifroMQ Proposal

no matter what other tags it may have. But I'd suggest we avoid a tag that may create a scarecrow or suddenly blame unrelated projects. Best, tison. Willem Jiang 于2025年3月26日周三 15:37写道： > > Hi Chris > > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 2:47 PM Christofer Dutz > wrote: > > &g

Re: [DISCUSS] BifroMQ Proposal

hich is a good use of the tool. [1]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J_GdZ7ziP4E Best， Willem Jiang On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 8:23 PM Christofer Dutz wrote: > > Hi all, > > I agree … a full-blown MQTT broker fits perfectly into the landscape of IoT > projects. Especially as MQTT i

AW: [DISCUSS] BifroMQ Proposal

Hi all, I agree … a full-blown MQTT broker fits perfectly into the landscape of IoT projects. Especially as MQTT is currently really starting to gain a lot of traction in the Industry (At least here in Germany). I would generally be willing to step in as Mentor. However, I have seen with many

AW: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Answer (incubating) as a Top Level Project

and hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache Answer Project: * Anne Zhu * Christofer Dutz * Enxin Xie * Feng Dong * Fengjun Lv * Guangfu Yang * Justin Mclean * Luffy * Nadia Jiang * Ning Qi

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Training (incubating) 1.3.0 RC 1

Ok … the vote passes with 3 binding IMPC votes. Von: sebb Datum: Montag, 30. September 2024 um 16:26 An: general@incubator.apache.org Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Training (incubating) 1.3.0 RC 1 On Mon, 30 Sept 2024 at 11:33, Christofer Dutz wrote: > > Apache Training (incubating)

[VOTE] Release Apache Training (incubating) 1.3.0 RC 1

se tag: 5ec6eef6c0eb14b9db0e39e58e8b0f0c1b9e3be3 As in the podling vote, 3 votes were cast by IPMC members explicitly indicating “IPMC” in their vote, this RC carries over binding +1 votes by: * Christofer Dutz * Justin McLean * Craig L Russel Per [3] "Before voting +1 PPMC members are required to d

Re: Proposal: Recording votes in podlings

Absolutely +1 cdutz (IPMC) from my side :-) Gesendet von Outlook für Android From: Xin Wang Sent: Saturday, September 7, 2024 3:40:39 AM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Proposal: Recording votes in podlings +1 Sounds like

AW: PMC is a committee

And there’s only one thing Greg hates even more as people calling someone or themselves a PMC … Try eating a burger with a knife and a fork and he’ll go nuclear. You will receive a detailed instruction on how it is built in order to be consumed how ;-) Chris Von: larry mccay Datum: Montag, 8

AW: PMC is a committee

I mean … I think I have never really been confused if someone used “PMC” or “PMC member” as from the context it was clear. What however I really hate to see in emails is people using short forms LMAA, WTF, IANAL, STFU, … this list is long and obviously I listed the ones I knew. Quite often when p

AW: [REMINDER] The Apache Answer project v1.3.1-RC2 (Round2) has been waiting for votes for quite some time now

content of the current voting email and add your voting information? This is my first time encountering this situation. Best, shuai Christofer Dutz 于2024年5月24日周五 17:08写道： > You did carry over my vote from the dev list, as I asked you to? > > Chris > > Von: Jean-Baptiste Ono

AW: [REMINDER] The Apache Answer project v1.3.1-RC2 (Round2) has been waiting for votes for quite some time now

You did carry over my vote from the dev list, as I asked you to? Chris Von: Jean-Baptiste Onofré Datum: Freitag, 24. Mai 2024 um 10:25 An: general@incubator.apache.org Betreff: Re: [REMINDER] The Apache Answer project v1.3.1-RC2 (Round2) has been waiting for votes for quite some time now Hi I

AW: [VOTE] Drop the incubator- prefix for podling's GitHub repo name

+1 binding Chris Von: larry mccay Datum: Mittwoch, 8. Mai 2024 um 17:06 An: general@incubator.apache.org Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Drop the incubator- prefix for podling's GitHub repo name +1 binding Can't we move the indicator to the About section where it says Mirror of (project name). Extend tha

AW: [QUESTION] Reproducible build for container images

HI Alex, I would like to go even further: Having any form of reproducibility actually isn’t a required attribute of any Apache releases (TLP or Podling). I do think that in the future there will be more strict requirements, however currently we don’t have any such rules. Chris Von: PJ Fannin

AW: [QUESTION] Handling of licensing issues for dependencies of dependencies

You might be lucky, and this third-party dependency might be pulled in, but not be required to use the parts of the library you are using in your project. In that case a simple “exclusion” could solve the problem. However, if it’s an essential part of the functionality, I agree with Justin … yo

[REMINDER] The Apache Answer project has been waiting for votes for quite some time now

I tink the subject says it all… The Apache Answer project has been waiting for votes way too long … would be great, if at least one IPMC member could spare a bit of time to provide the missing third vote. Chris

AW: [VOTE] Release Apache Answer(Incubating) v1.2.1-RC1 (Round2)

t; content. No header in that file as it causes issues, > > Wilfred > > > > > Best, > > tison. > > > > Christofer Dutz 于2024年1月3日周三 16:19写道： > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > However, I did find, that it seems to be impossible to

AW: [VOTE] Release Apache Answer(Incubating) v1.2.1-RC1 (Round2)

+1 (binding) However, I did find, that it seems to be impossible to build from sources, if the sources are unpacked from the src-archive instead of checked out. This should be addressed in future releases. Chris [OK] Download all staged artifacts under the url specified in the release vote em

AW: [VOTE] Release Apache Answer(Incubating) v1.2.0-RC1

Apache Answer(Incubating) v1.2.0-RC1 +1 (non-binding) On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 5:31 PM Christofer Dutz wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Chris > > [OK] Download all staged artifacts under the url specified in the release > vote email. > [OK] Verify the signature is correct. > [OK

AW: [VOTE] Release Apache Answer(Incubating) v1.2.0-RC1

+1 (binding) Chris [OK] Download all staged artifacts under the url specified in the release vote email. [OK] Verify the signature is correct. [OK] Check if the signature references an Apache email address. [OK] Verify the SHA512 hashes. [OK] Unzip the archive. [OK] Verify the existence of LICEN

Re: [VOTE] Accept Answer into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Chris Gesendet von Outlook für Android From: Uma Maheswara Rao Gangumalla Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2023 3:50:39 AM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept Answer into the Apache Incubator +1 (binding) R

AW: [VOTE] Release Apache Wayang (Incubating) v0.7.1 RC3

Well … carrying mine over as well: +1 (binding) Chris Von: Alexander Alten-Lorenz Datum: Montag, 11. September 2023 um 13:48 An: general@incubator.apache.org Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wayang (Incubating) v0.7.1 RC3 Hi, Carry my vote over. +1 (non-binding) —Alexander > On 9. Sep 2

AW: Little "upsie" at the Wayang podling

e existing > one. Revoke artifacts can cause significant downstream effect - you may > take leftpad on npmjs as an example. > > Best, > tison. > > > Christofer Dutz 于2023年7月25日周二 19:14写道： > > > Hi PJ, > > > > Unfortunately, I had to vote -1 on the relea

AW: Little "upside" at the Wayang podling

is finished? If the Incubator vote fails, I'm not sure but it may be feasible to see if the Maven team can remove the 0.7.0 artifacts. [1] https://wayang.apache.org/download/ On 2023/07/25 09:28:00 Christofer Dutz wrote: > Hi all, > > yesterday the Wayang podling was following the “rele

Little "upside" at the Wayang podling

Hi all, yesterday the Wayang podling was following the “release documentation” of a TLP and “forgot” to do the round over the IPMC. However, they’ve already moved things to the release distro area (from where they’ve removed it after me contacting them) but in Nexus they clicked on “release” an

Re: [REQUEST] Grant permission to deploy Maven project via GitHub Actions

r4...@gmail.com>>: > if It's ok to still publish RCs without a vote I think we vote for RCs so we always provide RCs without a vote. At least it's what I'm experiencing among Flink, Pulsar, and so on. Best, tison. Christofer Dutz mailto:christofer.d...@c-ware.

Re: [REQUEST] Grant permission to deploy Maven project via GitHub Actions

es only so I don't push an alert for doing so. But I do assume -rc suffix could be an improvement before the podling getting graduated. Best, tison. Christofer Dutz mailto:christofer.d...@c-ware.de>> 于2023年7月4日周二 19:45写道： > Hi all, > > I don't think this proced

Re: [REQUEST] Grant permission to deploy Maven project via GitHub Actions

Hi all, I don't think this procedure is ok according to our policies. Simply not listing a release on the project page will not help anyone using this as a dependency. At least, every time I update a dependency, I never check the projects page, if this is even a released version. Chris Am

Re: do we need to go through an Incubator PMC for a build tool?

Hi all, in PLC4X we have a maven-plugin that we use to generate code for PLC4X itself. In order to avoid super-messy releases, we have that plugin and similar build-tools in a separate repo. This is released using the normal release process. It does help however to cut the build-tools to work

AW: AW: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache DataLab (Incubating) as a Top Level Project

Hi Ruslan, thanks for clarifying that … well Apache Jira is absolutely ok in that case. However, I did look into your list in order to check what was up with the PPMC member removal and I find this really odd. There was a discussion on the private list about removing a PPMC member because he is

AW: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache DataLab (Incubating) as a Top Level Project

Hi all, let me jump into this too … First of all, the “centralized project management system” sort of triggered me at first and it seems Justin feels the same way. Is this system available someehre? If not, using this has to stop and “management” has to be moved to the email lists. A pretty co

AW: ASF Maven credential in a project-wise token?

t but fail to get it right. I read some of the INFRA pages but > still > > I don't know how to create a project and how to properly configure the > > workflow. > > > > > the credentials are there > > > > 2. Who's credentials? > > > > Best, >

Re: ASF Maven credential in a project-wise token?

If you run the build on asf Jenkins the credentials are there. You just need to inherit from the latest apache pom and it should work. Chris Gesendet von Outlook für Android From: tison Sent: Friday, May 26, 2023 1:33:29 PM To: Maven Deve

AW: License question when including other ASF projects

Hi Alex, sorry for the late response ... I also checked and the Eclipse Distribution Licence 1.0 seems to be Category A and EPL 2.0 cat B, so it should be ok as long as you only have dependencies to it. However I don’t know the plugin that you are using, so I can’t really help about how to res

Re: Looking for a champion: HyperIoT

license? If that’s not possible, I guess this is the end of the line for Apache. If it’s possible I am still keeping my hand up for being your Mentor and possibly championing the project. Chris From: Christofer Dutz Date: Thursday, 12. January 2023 at 14:22 To: general@incubator.apache.org

Re: Looking for a champion: HyperIoT

Hi all, well … it being used is not a requirement … some projects have been joining Apache even without a single user, but we want at least a minimum on community around it. As I’m really into the (I)IoT topic and I currently have one Mentoring slot open … I would be raising my hand for being

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Tuweni graduation

Tuweni graduation > On Dec 21, 2022, at 12:55 AM, Christofer Dutz > wrote: > > Hi all, > > I still think just because a resolution is added that it doesn’t mean the > board will accept it. > > Having barely 3 +1 votes also seems an indicator that the rest of the IPMC

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Tuweni graduation

whoever they are) feel welcome to ask questions and >> contribute on mailing list discussion, prs, code contributions, etc is the >> most important part of building a self-sustaining community. >> >> >> I’ll get off my soapbox now. >> >> - Josh >> >&g

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni graduation

;>> attrition is different from TLP >>> with some churn with new folks coming into an official TLP project while >>> others can fall off in a healthy way. >>> >>> Again, having the community test and release 14 separate releases >>> demonstrates con

Re: [DISCUSS] KIE Proposal

c 6, 2022, at 01:43, Christofer Dutz wrote: > > Hi Jason, > > Well, those numbers are a bit better than the initial ones. > Thing is: Mentors will not only have to help onboard people to Apache and > teach them how to do things, if they are doing their job correctly, they >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni graduation

Hi all, And in the last few months the ASF has sadly seen enough cases, in which even big projects suffered from the lack of diversity. So, I would also consider this to be a blocker. Community building isn’t something that happens or comes for free. It’s actually hard work, but it needs to be d

Re: [DISCUSS] KIE Proposal

: Jason Porter Date: Monday, 5. December 2022 at 19:08 To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] KIE Proposal On Dec 5, 2022, at 01:23, Christofer Dutz wrote: Hi all, as you already mentioned PLC4X, I think in general supporting something to do logic-decisions based on industrial

Re: [DISCUSS] KIE Proposal

Hi all, as you already mentioned PLC4X, I think in general supporting something to do logic-decisions based on industrial data-streams would be a nice addition. I do also agree that adding 80 projects might be quite a big gulp for us to ingest. How many people are we talking about being on th

Re: [MENTORS] December report timeline - reports due December 2022

I guess StreamPipes will not be filing an incubator report, but a board report this month ;-) Holen Sie sich Outlook für Android From: jmcl...@apache.org Sent: Friday, November 18, 2022 5:53:28 AM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject:

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache StreamPieps to a TLP

t; direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache > StreamPipes Project, and to have primary responsibility for management > of the projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache > StreamPipes Project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the pers

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pekko into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Chris From: Furkan KAMACI Date: Thursday, 20. October 2022 at 10:47 To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept Pekko into the Apache Incubator +1 (binding) On 20 Oct 2022 Thu at 10:17 Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Regards > JB > > On Wed, Oct 19

Re: [DISCUSS] Remove 72 hour waiting time to add PPMC members.

Hi, Well, I guess one of the reasons for the 72 hour was, that others can express their doubts before the person is invited. If we now exercise our means to object a nomination after it’s executed, we have this odd unpleasant situation of the person knowing what happened. But I guess we could t

Re: [DISCUSS] Remove 72 hour waiting time to add PPMC members.

+/-0 (binding) I’m a bit worried that in contrast to PMCs PPMCs are usually not quite familiar with how things work at Apache. Would we still have an option to intervene, if for example one PPMC bunch adds people from the same company, for example? Chris From: Goson zhang Date: Friday, 14. Oc

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

How about simply changing to Postgres? I wouldn't expect StreamPark to depend on some MySQL special features. Simply changing to Postgres should probably resolve the problem, right? Chris On 25.08.22, 08:43, "Calvin Kirs" wrote: Yes, this is consistent with what Justin said. If he is optio

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

Hmmm how does it differentiate to what StreamPipes does? Chris Holen Sie sich Outlook für Android From: Kelu Tao Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2022 4:39:28 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for St

RE: [DISCUSS] Tweak the incubator report template?

Yeah, I know that it will not propagate instantly. I just noticed that I generally would have added a comment to very many podlings about this and it should be easily fixable by adjusting the question. And of course ... doesn't have to be that wording ... just generally say which information w

[DISCUSS] Tweak the incubator report template?

Hi all, Just some things where I have been thinking of adding comments for clarification to the incubator report. Perhaps we could in general make this a bit simpler by tweaking the topics: ### Date of last release: ### Date and version of last release: ### When were the last committe

Re: May 2022 Podling Reporting Timeline

roid<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg> From: John D. Ament Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2022 2:29:16 PM To: general Subject: Re: May 2022 Podling Reporting Timeline Hi Christofer On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 4:47 AM Christofer Dutz wrote: > Hi John, > > guess I misse

RE: May 2022 Podling Reporting Timeline

too useful for the board, I think it's useful to the IPMC. So, I think podlings that missed filling in their parts in the last 3 months, should still report this time. But that's just my opinion. Chris -Original Message----- From: Christofer Dutz Sent: Donnerstag, 21. April 202

RE: May 2022 Podling Reporting Timeline

I should also add that some projects have failed to submit in the last 3 months, so I would add to this list: - brpc - Annotator - Crail - EventMesh - Flagon - Hivemail - InLong - Liminal - Marvin-AI - Milagro - Nemo - Pony Mail - Spot - Teaclave - Wayang So, we're also expecting these projects

RE: [VOTE] Apache StreamPipes 0.69.0 (incubating) RC1 release

id. - LICENSE, DISCLAIMER, and NOTICE are good. (The NOTICE year should be 2019-2022, we better update it in the next version.) - .sha & .asc checked - Source files have license headers if necessary. On 2022/03/15 11:32:15 Christofer Dutz wrote: > Hi all ... > > it would be great if

RE: [VOTE] Apache StreamPipes 0.69.0 (incubating) RC1 release

reamPipes community: > Result: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/hmx9wtyjw6tqbx70gpvnr8tqcg0xxlcc > Vote: https://lists.apache.org/thread/b58pym522yqn4qbdym549xh440boy52p > > From the PPMC vote, we carry over 1 binding IPMC votes: > Christofer Dutz > > The vote will be open for at

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Wayang (Incubating) 0.6.0-RC9

Common' folks ... please could some more people vote on this release ... the team worked so hard to resolve all of the issues pointed out, now let's help them get their first release out the door :-) Chris -Original Message- From: Zhang Yonglun Sent: Dienstag, 7. Dezember 2021 12:51

AW: [VOTE] Release Apache Wayang (Incubating) 0.6.0-RC5

Hi all, I have had a look at the code in question. And I have to admit that I agree with the Wayang folks. Yes ... it's about 10 lines of "code" initializing an array-like data structure ... even if there might be a patten regarding the line lengths. It's not a simple substitution of letters,

AW: [VOTE] Release Apache Wayang (Incubating) 0.6.0

+1 binding Carrying over my +1 from the vote on the project list Chris -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Alexander Alten Gesendet: Samstag, 23. Oktober 2021 14:44 An: general@incubator.apache.org Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wayang (Incubating) 0.6.0 +1 (binding) --alex On Sat,

Re: [VOTE] Apache StreamPipes 0.68.0 (incubating) RC1 release

t;>> We now kindly ask the Incubator PMC members to review and vote on this >>> release. >>> >>> Vote and result threads from the StreamPipes community: >>> Result: >>> >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r61928e5e971812dc271fe678c7e9e3202622a8 >>>

Re: Champion and Mentors wanted for new potential Apache SST incubator project

or the new SST incubator > project proposal; see below. > So far I contacted Justin Mclean and Christofer Dutz and they are > considering to become mentors. > > Best Regards > Lothar > > > === Abstract === > > SST (Semantic STEP Technology) is an optimiz

AW: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Daffodil to a top-level project

to serve at the > direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache > Daffodil Project, and to have primary responsibility for management of > the projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache Daffodil > Project; and be it further RESOLVED, t

AW: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Daffodil to a top-level project

Carrying over my +1 (binding) from the project Chris -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Alexander Alten-Lorenz Gesendet: Donnerstag, 4. Februar 2021 22:51 An: general@incubator.apache.org Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Daffodil to a top-level project +1 non-binding. Apache Daffod

[RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Wayang into the Apache Incubator

> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > Kind Regards, > > > > Furkan KAMACI > > > > > > > > On 11 Dec 2020 Fri at 20:04 Daniel B. Widdis &g

[VOTE] Accept Wayang into the Apache Incubator

of Valparaiso, Chile (PUCV) ** Wenceslao Palma-Muñoz === Sponsors === ** Champion ** * Christofer Dutz (christofer.dutz at c-ware dot de) ** Mentors ** . (cdutz) Christofer Dutz . (larsgeorge) Lars George . (berndf) Fondermann . (jbonofre) Jean-Baptiste

AW: [DISCUSS] Wayang Proposal

Hi Bernd, I just didn't want to leave the impression, that "we're full". So if anyone here would be interested in joining, he/she is more than welcome. I know that 3 is enough, but I also have seen that when starting with 3 initial mentors, usually 1 or 2 get lost some time after the incubation

AW: [DISCUSS] Wayang Proposal

Hi and welcome on this new communication channel. I'd like to add, that I really liked how the project approached me and how they reacted when I told them the old project name Rheem would probably not go down well and that I would suggest changing the name. I gave them some tips what things ar

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 3.0.0-rc1

+1 (binding) Tested on my Mac using java 13 using SBT 1.3.4 [OK] Download all staged artifacts under the url specified in the release vote email into a directory we’ll now call download-dir. [OK] Verify the signature is correct: Additional Apache tutorial on how to verify downloads can be foun

Apache Training (incubating) granted all Apache committers commit rights

Hi, We, the Apache Training PPMC, would like to tell you about an important update by which you can promote & train people on your Apache project: We're opening up commit access to all Apache committers. We at Apache build all sorts of great software. Some people even create training projects for

[NOTICE] The Apache Training (incubating) pooling has just finished a vote to turn on the commit bit for all apache committers ...

Hi all, the Apache Training podling has just passed a vote to turn on the commit bit for it’s code repos to allow all Apache Committers to commit. We hope this will revive the podling as we see potential for great benefit for all Apache projects. Filing an Infra-Issue for actually flicking the

[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Training (Incubating) Tools 1.0.0 RC2

> Hi, > > +1! > > Kind Regards, > Furkan KAMACI > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 7:49 PM Brahma Reddy Battula > wrote: > > > My late +1 (non-binding) > > > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 8:01 PM Christofer Dutz

[VOTE] Apache Training (Incubating) Tools 1.0.0 RC2

Hi, The vote to release Apache Training (incubating) Tools 1.0.0 has passed with 3 +1 (all from mentors) and one non-binding +1 vote. Binding votes (all were IPMC members): - Christofer Dutz (https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rd2cbadaf3b8c050e927f7ec5078d9b783eeaa234026542131e01477e%40

[jira] [Closed] (INCUBATOR-254) Permissions to edit subscriptions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-254?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Christofer Dutz closed INCUBATOR-254. - Resolution: Fixed Wrong project to report this for ... opened a new INFRA ticket

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache IoTDB as TLP

members of the Apache IoTDB Project: * Chen Wang * Christofer Dutz * Dawei Liu * Gaofei Cao * Haonan Hou * Jialin Qiao * Jianmin Wang * Jincheng Sun * Jinrui Zhang * Julian Feinauer * Jun Yuan * Justin Mclean * Kevin A. McGrail * Kun Liu

[jira] [Created] (INCUBATOR-254) Permissions to edit subscriptions

Christofer Dutz created INCUBATOR-254: - Summary: Permissions to edit subscriptions Key: INCUBATOR-254 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-254 Project: Incubator Issue

[DISCUSS] [VOTE] Release Apache IoTDB 0.10.1

I wouldn't say they have to be there ... but I personally do like projects that have them there: A README as well as a RELEASE_NOTES. Chris Am 19.08.20, 16:17 schrieb "Xiangdong Huang" : Hi, > I just have a quick question about the README files. Why do we put them into

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache IoTDB 0.10.1

Hi all, TL/DR: +1 binding Longer version: I started evaluating. As usual the IoTDB release candidate is in very good shape. Here some super minor things I noticed: - It seems the ".plan" templates in server/src/assembly/resources/tools/logVisualize/plans support comments, then they should c

Re: [RELEASENOTES?] Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.7.0-rc2

her" : > On Jul 10, 2020, at 12:43 AM, Christofer Dutz wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > I did find some minor issues though, please see below. > I would really suggest to start maintaining a RELEASE_NOTES file. I usually have a look at this i

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.7.0-rc2

+1 (binding) I did find some minor issues though, please see below. I would really suggest to start maintaining a RELEASE_NOTES file. I usually have a look at this in order to see what to expect of the new release. Chris [OK] Download all staged artifacts under the url specified in the release

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.6.0-rc2

included passera and UniquenessCache.scala code [OK] Rat doesn't report any surprizes [OK] Running the build and the tests according to documentation in the README (No test failures this time) Also the DISCLAIMERS are now in place in the jars Great job :-) Am 22.04.20, 19:32 schrieb "

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.6.0-rc2

Sorry for not being that responsive, I'm currently trying to finish something that's consuming a lot of time for me ... hopefully I'll be finished soon and can do the review. Chris Am 22.04.20, 15:59 schrieb "Olabusayo Kilo" : Thank you to the IPMC members who voted, we're still in need o

Re: Do Pooling jars have to contain the DISCLAIMER too?

Re: Do Pooling jars have to contain the DISCLAIMER too? > On Apr 9, 2020, at 11:25 AM, Christofer Dutz > wrote: > > Yhhh ... buuut. > > We're talking about convenience binaries here ... as we keep on insisting > that only source bundles are releases. >

Re: Do Pooling jars have to contain the DISCLAIMER too?

gards, Dave > On Apr 9, 2020, at 11:07 AM, Christofer Dutz wrote: > > Hi Dave, > > unfortunately I can't see the requirement to have a DISCLAIMER in there ... nor could I find it ... I totally agree with you, that it should be that way, but I cou

Re: Do Pooling jars have to contain the DISCLAIMER too?

.html Clear? Regards, Dave > On Apr 8, 2020, at 6:05 AM, Christofer Dutz wrote: > > Hi Justin, > > I agree that they should ... especially if you don't build from source or use the pre-compiled binaries you otherwise wouldn't h

Re: Do Pooling jars have to contain the DISCLAIMER too?

Hi Justin, I agree that they should ... especially if you don't build from source or use the pre-compiled binaries you otherwise wouldn't have any reference to the software undergoing incubation at the ASF. Was sort of just asking if it's a "should" (still a +1 with a notice to fix for next ti

Do Pooling jars have to contain the DISCLAIMER too?

Hi all, currently validating a podlings release and I stumbled over the following fact: * The src and bin bundles contain a DISCLAIMER * All of their project-jars in any of the bin bundles and the jars in Apache’s Nexus don’t have one Is this considered OK or should they all have a DISC

Re: [RESULT] [IP CLEARANCE] Maven Wrapper

Great ... :-) really looking forward to finally having this resolved AND the maven-wrapper itself as part of the Maven project. Guess after releasing that as apache once and updating the maven-wrapper scripts accordingly we can finally get rid of some of the controversial bits in our releases.

Re: [RESULT] [IP CLEARANCE] Maven Wrapper

Hi all, how about just adding the maven-wrapper itself ... the maven plugin isn't even needed. I have been using the maven-wrapper in almost every project, however the plugin I have never. It's just a little tool to add the cmd, sh files as well as some properties. I think we could even just w

[RESULT] [VOTE] Accept StreamPipes into the Apache Incubator

modules that can be dynamically installed at runtime: pipeline elements and connect adapters) * streampipes-website (containing docs + website) ** Issue tracking ** JIRA ID: StreamPipes === Initial Committers === List of initial committers in alpha

AW: [VOTE] Accept StreamPipes into the Apache Incubator

mPipes === Initial Committers === List of initial committers in alphabetical order: * Christofer Dutz (christofer.dutz at c-ware dot de) * Dominik Riemer (dominik dot riemer at gmail dot com) * Johannes Tex (tex at fzi dot de) * Patrick Wiener (wiener at fzi do

Re: [DISCUSS] StreamPipes proposal

Regards JB On 02/11/2019 17:39, Christofer Dutz wrote: > Hi all, > > I added him to the list. > > Chris > > Am 02.11.19, 11:53 schrieb "Dominik Riemer" : > > Yes, it

Re: [DISCUSS] StreamPipes proposal

ies ** > We would like to use Git for source code management and enable Github mirroring functionality. > > As we plan to merge some of the repos described above to simplify the release process we ask to create the following source repositories: > * streampipes (contai

AW: Write Access to Incubator Wiki

way to develop open source software, >>>> helps in finding new committers. As the core development team has >>>> already worked on StreamPipes for the past few years and is fully >>>> committed to the software and its benefit for the industrial IoT >>>

Re: Write Access to Incubator Wiki

> * priv...@streampipes.incubator.apache.org priv...@streampipes.incubator.apache.org> > > * comm...@streampipes.incubator.apache.org comm...@streampipes.incubator.apache.org> > > As StreamPipes is targeted to a non-technical audience, we see a dedica

Re: Donation of subproject for PLC4X

Hi all, We have that on our radar and that's why we're discussion naming options. We're not planning or ever had planned naming it "Crunch". Chris Am 07.10.19, 10:57 schrieb "Bertrand Delacretaz" : On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 10:52 AM Lars Francke wrote: > ...while a name search is not ne

Re: [DISCUSS] Drop requirement that ASF members can join IPMC by just asking

I agree, I think that the "requirement" (Never really knew there was such a requirement) of being a Member sort of gives you the easy entry path as if you are a member people expect you to understand the Apache Way. However that doesn't mean that people not being a member don't get the Apache

  1   2   >