Re: [DISCUSS] Accept GeaFlow into Apache Incubator

2025-05-22 Thread Imba Jin
Hi, I'm writing to express my enthusiastic welcome to the GeaFlow project as it joins the Apache Foundation! As a PPMC member of HugeGraph, I'm incredibly excited to see more partners join the ever-expanding graph domain. The more collaborators we have, the richer and more comprehensive our eco

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HertzBeat (incubating) 1.7.1-rc1

2025-05-22 Thread Zhang Yonglun
Hi, +1 binding I checked: [✓] Download HertzBeat is valid. [✓] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid. [✓] Source code distributions have correct names matching the current release. [✓] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each HertzBeat repo. [✓] All files have license headers if necessary.

[DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal of Fluss

2025-05-22 Thread Jark Wu
Thank you, Yu, for driving this proposal. As one of the core contributors of Fluss, we set our goal to become an Apache project when we wrote down the first line of code 2 years ago. That’s why, from the early stages of development and open-sourcing, we greatly emphasized compliance, licensing, pu

Re: [DISCUSS] Accept GeaFlow into Apache Incubator

2025-05-22 Thread Paul King
Hi, +1 from me for this proposal. Graph database technology is having a bit of a resurgence recently due to, among other things, synergy with LLMs. I see this as a growing area. One question for my own technical interest. You mention the link to Apache Tinkerpop/Gremlin. Skimming the repo, would

RE: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal of Fluss

2025-05-22 Thread Michael Koepf
Hi, To reinforce the significance of Fluss -- and to better illustrate how it differs from existing systems -- I want to share this figure with the community (courtesy of Jark): https://alibaba.github.io/fluss-docs/assets/images/img7-06886bca9797751895c82d707cb04b2d.jpg Being a streaming stor

Re: [DISCUSS] Accept GeaFlow into Apache Incubator

2025-05-22 Thread 范志东
Hi, Justin. Yes, what you understand is right. Historical contribution is the most important dimension for us to examine initial committer, and the future potential is also evaluated comprehensively based on the developer's historical contribution and technology vision. I am sorry for not express

Re: [DISCUSS] Accept GeaFlow into Apache Incubator

2025-05-22 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > In order to keep the clarity of the commit logs, we re-organize and squash > the commit history of the repository before the official open source, so > that the developer's contribution is inconsistent with the information on > GitHub. Thanks for that. > When preparing for initial committe

Re: [DISCUSS] Accept GeaFlow into Apache Incubator

2025-05-22 Thread 范志东
Hi Justin, Thanks for your serious and meticulous feedback! GeaFlow experienced many years of technical R&D iterations and improvements in Ant Group before it was officially open source in June 2023. In order to keep the clarity of the commit logs, we re-organize and squash the commit history of