Hi, > In order to keep the clarity of the commit logs, we re-organize and squash > the commit history of the repository before the official open source, so > that the developer's contribution is inconsistent with the information on > GitHub.
Thanks for that. > When preparing for initial committers, we took into account the developer's > historical contribution, technical vision and future development potential > and finally decided on 6 core contributors in the initial committer list. It's a bit unusual to look at "future development potential.” Committer status should be awarded on merit, i.e. based on what someone has done, not on what they might do in the future. I’d still be interested in knowing the company affiliation of these initial six committers and why the currently “largest" committer was omitted. If all of the committers are from the Ant Group, that is not an issue, but it does mean more work will need to be done during Incubation to make a more diverse PMC. Kind Regards, Justin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
