A day earlier, I sent a different but related suggestion to NLPCraft
(with my mentor hat on). I'll make sure feedback gets back to this
list if they respond to that suggestion.
Cheers, Paul.
On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 8:55 AM Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Yesterday, I went over the projects that
Hi,
Yesterday, I went over the projects that have been in the incubator for too
long to see where they were. I’ve sent them an email to focus on graduation or
retirement.
Here’s the list:
Toree 2015
Annotator 2016 - last report suggests they will retire
Livy 2017
Nemo 2018 - discussing possibl
> On Mar 20, 2025, at 8:52 AM, sebb wrote:
>
> On Thu, 20 Mar 2025 at 15:39, tison wrote:
>>
>>> The source for lists.apache.org belongs to the vendor and I believe that
>>> the PonyMail Podling’s source is a fork that differs and lacks proprietary
>>> parts
>
> AIUI, lists.a.o runs code
> On Mar 20, 2025, at 12:44 AM, Xuanwo wrote:
>
> It looks like PonyMail has been discontinued. How about we retire PonyMail
> and switch to more mature solutions like Mailman and HyperKitty?
lists.apache.org is a provided service from a vendor with a contract from the
ASF. This Pony Mail di
> The source for lists.apache.org belongs to the vendor and I believe that the
> PonyMail Podling’s source is a fork that differs and lacks proprietary parts
Thanks for your information. If so, I agree that we may retire the
project if the current PMC won't continue it. My personal feeling is
tha
Hi Tison,
> On Mar 20, 2025, at 8:23 AM, tison wrote:
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> On Retirement, I have one question: does PonyMail have no more efforts
> needed, even regular maintenance?
The source for lists.apache.org belongs to the vendor and I believe that the
PonyMail Podling’s source is a fork wh
Hi Dave,
On Retirement, I have one question: does PonyMail have no more efforts
needed, even regular maintenance?
BTW, we have some repo that are part of our infrastructure, they don't
do ASF "release" IIUC but also not "retire" or archive.
Best,
tison.
Dave Fisher 于2025年3月20日周四 23:20写道：
>
> L
Let’s focus on the original question.
> On Mar 20, 2025, at 12:35 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The Pony Mail project has been incubating since 2016 and lately has failed to
> submit its reports. The PPMC is struggling to attract people and only has two
> or three active people on it.
On Thu, 20 Mar 2025 at 11:58, Shane Curcuru wrote:
>
> tison wrote on 3/20/25 3:53 AM:
> >> HyperKitty looks much nicer than PonyMail and is well-maintained.
> >
> > Not sure if we should fork a new thread to discuss about choosing
> > mailing list archive.
>
> Yes, discussions around mail archivi
> HyperKitty looks much nicer than PonyMail and is well-maintained.
Not sure if we should fork a new thread to discuss about choosing
mailing list archive.
Currently, on our website [1] we advocate three options:
1. [Apache mail archives](https://lists.apache.org/)
2. [MARC](http://marc.info/)
3
It looks like PonyMail has been discontinued. How about we retire PonyMail and
switch to more mature solutions like Mailman and HyperKitty?
HyperKitty looks much nicer than PonyMail and is well-maintained.
Here is an example from Fedora: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/
On Thu, Mar 20,
Hi,
The Pony Mail project has been incubating since 2016 and lately has failed to
submit its reports. The PPMC is struggling to attract people and only has two
or three active people on it. We have discussed this project before but haven't
concluded what to do with it. It is a mature project th
12 matches
Mail list logo
