HI,
> Users should run `npm install xxx`, `pip install xxx`, or `cargo add xxx`
> to include our library in their dependency list. Users should write code
> in their own libraries or applications using statements such as `use xxx`
> or `import xxx`. Adding the prefixes `apache-` or `asf-` coul
Hi Justin,
> I noticed the domain opendal.databend.rs mentioned there. Who owns that
> domain?
As an analogy, think of answer.dev and answer.apache.org. You are in
the thread of a similar situation[1].
Best,
tison.
[1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/sj5nv4bhxl3xrm8yp01fkkrl1rkk3w8b
Xuanwo 于
Hi,
> The domain `opendal.databend.rs` is owned by Databend Labs and was used as
> the
> primary domain before OpenDAL entered the incubation stage. The PMC will
> coordinate
> with Databend Labs to ensure that all instances are updated to
> `opendal.apache.org`.
It would be best if the domai
> I noticed the domain opendal.databend.rs mentioned there. Who owns that
> domain?
The domain `opendal.databend.rs` is owned by Databend Labs and was used as the
primary domain before OpenDAL entered the incubation stage. The PMC will
coordinate
with Databend Labs to ensure that all instances
Hi,
> Thanks for your reply to report potential branding issues. The PMC is
> actively responding to these comments.
>
> * https://github.com/apache/incubator-opendal/pull/3829/files
> * https://github.com/apache/incubator-opendal/pull/3830/files
> * https://github.com/apache/incubator-opendal/pu
Hi Justin
> - LICENSE mentions 1 3rd party file from Guava; however, the NOTICE lists
> both Apache Spark and Apache Flink, so I think other files may have been
> copied into the code base, and LICENSE is missing information or the NOTICE
> is incorrect.
> - This file [2] seems to have been co
Hi Justin,
Thanks for your reply to report potential branding issues. The PMC is
actively responding to these comments.
* https://github.com/apache/incubator-opendal/pull/3829/files
* https://github.com/apache/incubator-opendal/pull/3830/files
* https://github.com/apache/incubator-opendal/pull/38
Carry my non-binding +1 VOTE from the dev@o.a.o
On Thu, Dec 28, 2023, at 13:12, Liuqing Yue wrote:
> Hello Incubator PMC,
>
> The Apache OpenDAL community has voted and approved the release of Apache
> OpenDAL(incubating) 0.44.0-rc.1. We now kindly request the IPMC members
> review and vote for th
Hello Incubator PMC,
The Apache OpenDAL community has voted and approved the release of Apache
OpenDAL(incubating) 0.44.0-rc.1. We now kindly request the IPMC members
review and vote for this release.
OpenDAL is a data access layer that allows users to easily and efficiently
retrieve data from va
+1
We have been using Glutin with Apache Kyuubi and Apache Spark
at NetEase for about a year now. It's a promising project.
And I'm glad to be one of the nominated mentors.
Thanks,
Kent Yao
On 2023/12/28 03:25:56 ShaoFeng Shi wrote:
> Hi Justin,
>
> Yeah, 12 months is a little tough; I have d
Hi Justin,
Yeah, 12 months is a little tough; I have discussed this with the team, and
updated the proposal to 18 months.
Best regards,
Shaofeng Shi 史少锋
Apache Kylin PMC,
Apache Incubator PMC,
Email: shaofeng...@apache.org
Apache Kylin FAQ: https://kylin.apache.org/docs/gettingstarted/faq.html
Hi Junping,
Thank you for the suggestion. I have discussed this with the team, they
agree with this. I have updated abstract part of the proposal. The slogan
on the document website will be updated later.
Best regards,
Shaofeng Shi 史少锋
Apache Kylin PMC,
Apache Incubator PMC,
Email: shaofeng...@a
For the platforms npm, PyPI, crates.io, and NuGet, the situation is somewhat
different: We deliver libraries instead binaries.
Users should run `npm install xxx`, `pip install xxx`, or `cargo add xxx`
to include our library in their dependency list. Users should write code
in their own librarie
Hi Rakesh,
Yeah, the team aware that, they plan to merge the Trino plugin into the
main repository at some point of time, depends on its maturity. The Hive
plugin is not on current roadmap I think, but this is open for discussion.
Best regards,
Shaofeng Shi 史少锋
Apache Kylin PMC,
Apache Incubator
Hi,
> We just checked their repo and found the PR[1] which added Celeborn's code
> in their repo. We got in touch with them and they told us that the code was
> deleted a month ago. I also checked their release[2] and didn't find
> Celeborn's code in their source ball. So I guess this is no longer
Hi,
> The proposal here is to improve the expression on NPM / PyPI for the
> package name to be either:
>
> 1. apache-projectname
> 2. projectname
Existing ASF policy has this to say:
- "All PMCs must to comply with the Apache Project Branding Requirements.” [1]
- “PMCs are directly responsible
Hi,
I’ll note these guidelines were discussed and voted on by the IPMC a while
back. Legal and trademarks also reviewed them and had input, and the work is
based on existing policy and years of discussion. They, however, have only had
minor updates since being formed.
Kind Regards,
Justin
--
> For instance, if your maven build is `-Pbenchmark` and it's clear
> that the user needs to include this license when compiling from source.
Yeah. I'm going to collaborate with Fury to follow this approach and
document clearly how a developer can intentionally run benchmark with
JMH as a dep.
Be
I found the original discussion for this guideline[1], and I respect
that the Incubator did such pioneer works to provide a base to discuss
and evolve.
The proposal here is to improve the expression on NPM / PyPI for the
package name to be either:
1. apache-projectname
2. projectname
or loosely
On Wed, Dec 27, 2023 at 11:38 AM tison wrote:
> > application, a developer has preinstalled the JDK (or using a manager of
> > some kind to install it - so not something we're forcing upon them). In
>
> No. To running a Java Application in a normal way, the JRE is
> required. Saying "not somethi
> application, a developer has preinstalled the JDK (or using a manager of
> some kind to install it - so not something we're forcing upon them). In
No. To running a Java Application in a normal way, the JRE is
required. Saying "not something we're forcing upon them" sounds
sophistry.
Best,
tiso
Hi John,
Glad to hear your feedback. Reply inline:
> In the case of JMH, the repository I linked above forces the user to download
> the additional dependency from maven central (or similar repository) rather
> than relying on the system preinstalled library.
>From a technical view, this is not
On Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 8:09 PM tison wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The new podling Fury depends on jmh[1] which is licensed under GPLv2
> with "CLASSPATH" EXCEPTION.
>
Just to confirm, are you referring to the code under [benchmark]?
>
> IIRC Flink ever factored out its benchmark code into a separate repo
The vote passes with 3 binding +1s.
Vote Thread
https://lists.apache.org/thread/rschhjdlqqqjhngbhgn5z8hr4jkyvvbh
Votes
Duo Zhang
Matthew de Detrich
PJ Fanning
I will proceed with the release and make the announcements over the coming days.
---
Thanks Duo Zhang. I'll see about getting some build docs ready for the next RC.
I did include this in the vote email but it is definitely better to
have proper build docs.
{snip}
Some of the tests rely on postgresql running locally on port 5432 and
the DDL is at ddl-scripts/create_tables_postgres
+1 binding
Checked sigs and sums: Matched
LICENSE and NOTICE: Looks fine
DISCLAIMER: In place
Built from src:
I pulled the docker image
'eclipse-temurin-focal-11.0.21_9_1.9.8_3.3.1' and then type sbt,
passed
Run tests:
I just typed test in the sbt shell but it failed with 'Cannot
connect to lo
Hi,
The Distribution Guidelines[1] in ASF Incubator website wrote:
* Artifacts show up on https://www.npmjs.com/package/apache-;
version page.
* Artifacts need to be placed in
https://pypi.org/project/apache-;. To comply with ASF release
and distributions please ensure the following:
Both requir
Would any of the Pekko mentors or indeed, any Incubator PMC members have time
to review this Pekko RC? It marks the final set of Pekko modules that have yet
to be released.
On 2023/12/20 23:10:25 Matthew de Detrich wrote:
> Carrying over my +1 vote from
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/yyhoygwh
Thanks for the clarification Willem and Justin, I've updated the Incubator
Release Checklist document [1] accordingly.
I hereby withdraw my -1 and below is my updated vote:
+1 (binding)
- Checked sum and signatures: OK
- Checked DISCLAIMER file exists: OK
- Checked LICENSE and NOTICE files: OK
Hi Justin,
Thanks for your input!
> There is some overlap with some files with [1]; this is concerning as
these files are under a GPL license. Would you happen to know who has
copied from whom here? If ASF files have been re-licensed under the GPL
license, what is the PMC doing about this? What i
30 matches
Mail list logo
