FW: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.9.0-incubating [rc2]

Forwarding my +1 from dev list +1 Thanks! From: Yanhui ZHAO Sent: Saturday, September 2, 2017 3:26 PM To: d...@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.9.0-incubating [rc2] +1 for this rele

Re: [DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - September 2017

For Heron, Twitter Legal is working on the SGA. We have sent emails for the progress last week but they haven't replied yet. 2017-09-12 17:24 GMT-07:00 John D. Ament : > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 6:02 PM Dave Fisher wrote: > > > Pulsar is now signed off and also shepherd notes done. > > > > Heron

Re: [RESULT] Vote on Impala 2.10.0 release candidate 2

Thanks for your hard work on this Bharath. On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 11:14 PM, Bharath Vissapragada < bhara...@cloudera.com> wrote: > The vote has passed with the following tally. > > +1 (binding) > > - Brock Noland > - Carl Steinbach > - John D. Ament > > -1 (binding) - None > 0 - None > > Thanks

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.9.0-incubating [rc2]

Sure. Thanks for pointing this out. I will take care of this in the next one. Thanks, Johnu On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 11:18 AM, sebb wrote: > Same comments as for the Impala release (I'm reading mails backwards): > > The summary is easy to read, but has no context. > > Ideally the result mail sho

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.9.0-incubating [rc2]

Same comments as for the Impala release (I'm reading mails backwards): The summary is easy to read, but has no context. Ideally the result mail should either form part of the VOTE thread (reply and prefix the subject with [RESULT]) or should contain a link to the vote thread. Please could you co

Re: [RESULT] Vote on Impala 2.10.0 release candidate 2

dev@ to bcc. Sure Sebb. Will keep that in mind for next vote. FWIW, here < https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/3dbe0575a37cf99896364f386ef398fe92458825f6557a451f16c6dc@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E> is the voting thread for this release. On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 10:10 AM, sebb wrote: >

[RESULT][VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.9.0-incubating [rc2]

Hi all, After being opened for over more than 72 hours, the vote for releasing Apache Mnemonic 0.9.0-incubating passed with 4 binding +1s, 1 non-binding +1s and no 0 or -1. * Binding votes +1s: * Uma Gangumalla (umamahesh) Henry Saputra (hsaputra) Justin Mclean (jmclean) Jean-Baptiste Onofré ) *

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.9.0-incubating [rc2]

Forwarding my +1 from dev list as well, +1 Thanks! On 2017-09-12 23:11, "Gangumalla, Uma" wrote: > Forwarding my +1 from dev list. > > > +1 (binding) > > Regards, > Uma > > On 9/7/17, 3:14 PM, "Johnu George" wrote: > > >Hello incubator PMCs, > > > >The Apache Mnemonic community PPMCs and

Re: [RESULT] Vote on Impala 2.10.0 release candidate 2

The summary is easy to read, but has no context. Ideally the result mail should either form part of the VOTE thread (reply and prefix the subject with [RESULT]) or should contain a link to the vote thread. Please could you consider addressing this for the next vote result? Thanks. Just my 2p

Re: [DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - September 2017

Makes sense, was missing your reminders, now I know why. Looking forward to reporting again, heaps will have happened in the interim. Gj On Wed, 13 Sep 2017 at 12:28, John D. Ament wrote: > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 2:40 AM Geertjan Wielenga < > geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > On W

Re: [DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - September 2017

On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 2:40 AM Geertjan Wielenga < geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 2:23 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > > Geertjan, > > > > What if we add a note under Legal, something like: > > > > - Thanks to hard work on both the Oracle and ASF side, the Netbeans