Same comments as for the Impala release (I'm reading mails backwards): The summary is easy to read, but has no context.
Ideally the result mail should either form part of the VOTE thread (reply and prefix the subject with [RESULT]) or should contain a link to the vote thread. Please could you consider addressing this for the next vote result? Thanks. Just my 2p On 13 September 2017 at 18:39, Johnu George <jo...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > After being opened for over more than 72 hours, the vote for releasing > Apache > Mnemonic 0.9.0-incubating passed with 4 binding +1s, 1 non-binding +1s and > no 0 or -1. > > * Binding votes +1s: * > Uma Gangumalla (umamahesh) > Henry Saputra (hsaputra) > Justin Mclean (jmclean) > Jean-Baptiste Onofré ) > > * Non-binding votes +1s: * > Gang (Gary) Wang (garyw) > > <0 or -1 vote if any> > > Project Members Role Info > http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/develop/ > > *Thanks all* > Cheers > Johnu on behalf of the Apache Mnemonic (incubating) community --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
