Sure. Thanks for pointing this out. I will take care of this in the next
one.

Thanks,
Johnu

On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 11:18 AM, sebb <[email protected]> wrote:

> Same comments as for the Impala release (I'm reading mails backwards):
>
> The summary is easy to read, but has no context.
>
> Ideally the result mail should either form part of the VOTE thread
> (reply and prefix the subject with [RESULT]) or should contain a link
> to the vote thread.
>
> Please could you consider addressing this for the next vote result?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Just my 2p
>
> On 13 September 2017 at 18:39, Johnu George <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After being opened for over more than 72 hours, the vote for releasing
> > Apache
> > Mnemonic 0.9.0-incubating passed with 4 binding +1s, 1 non-binding +1s
> and
> > no 0 or -1.
> >
> > * Binding votes +1s: *
> > Uma Gangumalla (umamahesh)
> > Henry Saputra (hsaputra)
> > Justin Mclean (jmclean)
> > Jean-Baptiste Onofré )
> >
> > * Non-binding votes +1s: *
> > Gang (Gary) Wang (garyw)
> >
> > <0 or -1 vote if any>
> >
> > Project Members Role Info
> > http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/develop/
> >
> > *Thanks all*
> > Cheers
> > Johnu on behalf of the Apache Mnemonic (incubating) community
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

Reply via email to