While I am completely agree with your point, and the Ignite graduation
is the water under the bridge, this is in an important point for the
current podlings to consider. Perhaps it could be done elsewhere as
well, but I am not sure where would be the best place for it.
Thoughts?
Thanks,
Cos
--
Is the use of Google Analytics also prohibited by #4?
-Alex
On 6/5/17, 8:16 PM, "shaposh...@gmail.com on behalf of Roman Shaposhnik"
wrote:
>On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 8:02 PM, Julian Hyde wrote:
>> Thanks for the explanation, Roman. I had no idea that policies for
>>hosted binaries
>> were strict
While these are all great discussion points, I don't believe they're
relevant to incubator only and probably should have remained on the
legal-discuss list. Ignite graduated ~2 years ago. The incubator probably
doesn't have an opinion about this, but it's good to know that the policy
may change (
As a follow up to my prior question, (
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/31119aafbc4260720d222666f3efd01f2fe2975e424039ea539c9cb6@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
).
Looking at our current tracking file for podlings, I wonder how much of the
information is useful. Let's use Traffic Control as
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 8:02 PM, Julian Hyde wrote:
> Thanks for the explanation, Roman. I had no idea that policies for hosted
> binaries
> were stricter than for source code (other than the obvious effect on
> licensing when you bundle in dependencies).
Btw, this one is serious enough that I'd
I generally agree with Sebb's sentiments. Its confusing that you list a
downloads page, but it's not listed (though I feel its better that its not
shown based on last release's issues).
For next release, I would like the output artifact to be
"apache-trafficcontrol-VERSION-incubating" (think back
Thanks for the explanation, Roman. I had no idea that policies for hosted
binaries were stricter than for source code (other than the obvious effect on
licensing when you bundle in dependencies).
Julian
> On Jun 5, 2017, at 7:47 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 7:34 PM,
Hi all,
Am .06.2017, 04:47 Uhr, schrieb Roman Shaposhnik :
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 7:34 PM, Julian Hyde wrote:
If the binaries are built from the released source code I don’t think
we should restrict what the binaries do.
Well, but that's not how we treat licensing for example. For example
Thanks Greg. I have already started the conversation on private@ignite
and opened IGNITE-5413
--
Take care,
Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik
2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616 6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this email are those of the author,
and do not necessarily represent the views
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 7:34 PM, Julian Hyde wrote:
> If the binaries are built from the released source code I don’t think we
> should restrict what the binaries do.
Well, but that's not how we treat licensing for example. For example
-- there's plenty of ASF project that
allow GPL licensed exte
The Infrastructure team is taking this to the Apache Ignite PMC. This is
completely improper.
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 9:34 PM, Julian Hyde wrote:
> If the binaries are built from the released source code I don’t think we
> should restrict what the binaries do. The question is whether the communit
If the binaries are built from the released source code I don’t think we should
restrict what the binaries do. The question is whether the community is aware
of what the code is doing, and considers it to be in the best interests of the
project.
The answer seems to be yes, and yes. I saw that t
Hi!
after seeing this thread on legal-discuss:
https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/201706.mbox/%3CCAGJoAUn-hiE89mWObh1Lb2S_vgqQJ%3DDC%3D1P_V1REQ9hUERCFog%40mail.gmail.com%3E
I'd like to ask a policy related question.
What we currently have is a whole bunch of binarie
Suma,
One more thing. I cannot find a podling name search on file for Atlas.
Has this been done? See also [1]
John
[1]: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/names.html#name-search
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 8:45 PM John D. Ament wrote:
> Hi Suma,
>
> Thanks for the heads up. There is actually n
On 5 June 2017 at 23:20, Dan Kirkwood wrote:
> Thanks for that feedback -- I'll make sure our release instructions
> are clear on those points and remove users@ from any future votes.
>
>> The draft release notes (along with links to artifacts,
>> signatures/checksums, and updated documentation) c
Thanks for that feedback -- I'll make sure our release instructions
are clear on those points and remove users@ from any future votes.
> The draft release notes (along with links to artifacts,
> signatures/checksums, and updated documentation) can be found here:
>
> http://trafficcontrol.incubator
On 5 June 2017 at 22:12, Dan Kirkwood wrote:
DROPPED user@ list - see below.
> Hello Incubator PMC,
>
> The Apache Traffic Control community has voted on and approved a
> proposal to release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.1-incubating. We now
> kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review an
Please see the following issue folks
https://github.com/redpony/cdec/issues/94
Thanks
Lewis
On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 9:46 AM, lewis john mcgibbney
wrote:
> Hi Justin,
> Excellent catch. Thank you for rebiewing the RC... it is really helping us
> out.
> To answer your question, I had to look back t
Hi Justin and Tommaso,
I'll register and issue over on the cdec repository and ping the
contributors over there. I'll cross-reference the outcome here and
hopefully we can move forward.
Lewis
On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 9:46 AM, lewis john mcgibbney
wrote:
> Hi Justin,
> Excellent catch. Thank you fo
Hello Incubator PMC,
The Apache Traffic Control community has voted on and approved a
proposal to release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.1-incubating. We now
kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this
incubator release.
The VOTE RESULT is here:
https://lists.apache.org/thr
Hi,
I am sorry I was off email when all of this happened. Would like to add my post
result +1 to join everyone in supporting this effort!
Thanks!
Bikas
From: Sean Busbey
Sent: Monday, June 5, 2017 10:34:45 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [RESULT] R
Thanks a bunch, Nick!
+Vinod
> On Jun 3, 2017, at 1:37 AM, Nick Burch wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2 Jun 2017, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli wrote:
>> I just volunteered to be a mentor for the Apache Slider incubator project.
>> Please grant me write access to Apache Incubator Wiki.
>
> Karma granted, happy
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 3:17 PM, Suma Shivaprasad
wrote:
> Thanks Sam. Have added the rest of the PPMC/committers.
Cool!
For future reference, you can click on + multiple times to queue up
additions, and then add them all at once.
Also, take a look at the "Draft graduation resolution" at the bot
Thanks Sam. Have added the rest of the PPMC/committers.
Suma
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 7:46 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 6:25 PM, Suma Shivaprasad
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Once the issues are rectified, will work with one of the mentors to
> update
> > https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/p
With 7 binding +1 votes (and 14 non-binding +1 votes), this vote passes.
Thanks for everyone who took the time to vote!
I'll coordinate with the mentors to start the initial paperwork today. (And
we'd be thrilled for the 4th mentor JB!)
binding:
Larry McCay
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Luciano Resende
+1 binding, though the license and notice have room for improvement
signature and checksums are good
tarball matches the git tag
disclaimer is good
builds from git tag
unit tests pass
overall the license and notice appear to reflect the contents of the source
release, with the following notes that
+1
It moves us towards a self-service (dare I say “github-like”) experience for
podlings, and that is always good.
Furthermore, if there are choices to be made (e.g. svnpubsub vs. CMS) I think
the tooling should strongly encourage them to take the “standard” option. Maybe
it doesn’t even prese
On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 6:12 PM, James Bognar
wrote:
> ...The reason I asked is because we've previously been asked about ownership
> of image files during release votes, so I wasn't sure if we were supposed
> to mark them somehow...
You could create a ticket in your issue tracker to indicate the
+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Hi all,
I'm calling a vote for Weex-incubating 0.12.0-RC5 release.
The changes fix problems pointed out by John D. Ament and Justin Mclean in
RC4 voting thread[1].
Thanks to these guys. And thanks to people who vote +1 too. Hope this RC
would finally passed.
The PPMC vote for this release has pas
Hi,
Not to be a pain but I still don't think that quite explains the "All rights
reserved” comment.
Just because these files were added to a repo that is under an Apache license
(by someone other than the author I would note) doesn't automatically mean the
original files were Apache licensed.
thanks indeed Justin and Lewis for reviewing the history.
As far as I can see also those files are licensed under AL2 [1], not sure
if we'd need to add an entry to the NOTICE file at this point though.
Regards,
Tommaso
[1] : https://github.com/redpony/cdec/blob/master/LICENSE.txt
Il giorno ven 2
32 matches
Mail list logo
