Hello Incubator PMC’ers,
The Apache Airflow community has voted and approved the proposal to release
Apache Airflow 1.8.0 (incubating) based on 1.8.0 Release Candidate 4. We now
kindly request the Incubator PMC members to review and vote on this incubator
release. If the vote is successful we w
When I look at https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/mxnet - I only see the
mentors for the project listed on the PPMC. Any idea what I need to modify
to add the original committers from the proposal to the PPMC?
Or do the mentors have to bootstrap and vote them all on?
Thanks,
Hen
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Mike Jumper wrote:
> AFAIK, only the copyright holder can relicense a copyrighted work, whereas
> others may sublicense under compatible terms so long as the original
> license grants that permission (ie: the license of the original work is not
> actually changing
charlie created INCUBATOR-197:
-
Summary: seedling logo
Key: INCUBATOR-197
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-197
Project: Incubator
Issue Type: Task
Components: LogoSu
Hi all,
The Apache RocketMQ team would like to announce the release of Apache
RocketMQ 4.0.0 (incubating).
More details regarding Apache RocketMQ can be found at:
http://rocketmq.incubator.apache.org/
The release artifacts can be downloaded here:
https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi?path=incu
Submitted my vote, thanks John.
Regards
Liang
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-incubator-general.996316.n3.nabble.com/Voting-now-open-for-new-Incubator-Logo-tp53887p53888.html
Sent from the Apache Incubator - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
All,
Thanks for everyone has submitted a proposed logo for the Incubator! The
submissions are now over, and the voting can begin. We have a lot of great
entrants. A full list can be found at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12339142
Please note that this is a general community vot
IMHO, this bug is serious enough to be a showstopper. There's no workaround
for it in depent projects such as Phoenix. How about we roll another RC
with a fix today?
Other non Apache projects don't need to wait until the release closes (or
could even rely on non released bits).
James
On Mon,
Hey James,
There are other projects that depend on the 0.11.0 release, and need it in
the next couple of days. This bug can be worked around in the dependent
projects.
I suggest letting this release go through by marking TEPHRA-223 as a known
issue. We can do a 0.11.1 release immediately after fi
Looks like a serious issue was found with TEPHRA-223, so switching my vote
to -1. Hopefully we can get a quick fix with a new RC very soon.
James
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Alan Gates wrote:
> Forwarding my +1 from the dev list.
>
> Alan.
>
> > On Feb 17, 2017, at 11:52 AM, James Tay
AFAIK, only the copyright holder can relicense a copyrighted work, whereas
others may sublicense under compatible terms so long as the original
license grants that permission (ie: the license of the original work is not
actually changing).
Is that not correct?
- Mike
On Feb 20, 2017 10:35 AM, "
Mike,
I'll point out that sublicense is probably not the right term. While both
are Cat A, the BSD license is much less restrictive/offers less than the
Apache license. Re-license is more accurate. Its still compatible with
BSD, and removes any expectation that one is more/less than the other
l
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 3:30 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 11:09 PM Roman Shaposhnik
> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 8:01 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
>> > I haven't followed this issue, but if we take BSD licensed source and
>> > modifies it (enough to claim copyright on
On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 11:09 PM Roman Shaposhnik
wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 8:01 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> > I haven't followed this issue, but if we take BSD licensed source and
> > modifies it (enough to claim copyright on the modifications) we
> re-license
> > to ALv2, but leaves the
14 matches
Mail list logo
