Thank you Konstantin!
KEYS file in release area has been updated [1]
Feedback has been logged in JIRA:
* enforce minimum maven version [2]
* document "how to validate licences" [3]
Will do our best to improve UX for the next release!
--
Alex
1. https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/inc
Hi all,
The Apache FreeMarker community has voted on and approved a proposal
to release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01-incubating.
PPMC Vote Calls (2 cancelled votes, the 3rd is the final iteration):
1.
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-freemarker-dev/201601.mbox/%3C1491892621.20
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On 01/19/2016 01:25 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
I want to encourage more IPMC members to cast a vote, in case this
thread went unnoticed.
Cheers,
Hadrian
On 01/16/2016 03:40 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
The vote is as usually open for at least 72 hours.
Here's my +1.
H
+1 binding
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:26 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> With regards,
> Daniel.
>
> On 01/19/2016 01:25 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>> I want to encourage more IPMC members to cast a vote, in case this
>> thread went unnoticed.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Hadrian
>>
>> On 01/16/20
+1 (binding)
With regards,
Daniel.
On 01/19/2016 01:25 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> I want to encourage more IPMC members to cast a vote, in case this
> thread went unnoticed.
>
> Cheers,
> Hadrian
>
> On 01/16/2016 03:40 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>> The vote is as usually open for at least 72
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20/01/2016 03:38, Henri Yandell wrote:
> License-wise, any expectation of problems from the GPL and LGPL depend
encies?
I'd also recommend closely examining the license for any TM libraries
that ship with the program, with a focus on the providenc
The qt discussion was a community process during incubation. It was not known
in advance. This process Marvin describes would not have caught the issue. The
community wanted to find a way more slowly and focus on code efforts. When
asked to help slow the discussion someone heated it up instead.
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 8:59 PM, Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> I am asking what the process should be for a podling accepting further
> donations of code. Seems to me they should be following the normal IP
> process that a PMC would.
That's kind of what my reply was, wasn't it?
Thanks,
Roman.
--
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 4:43 AM, Roman Shaposhnik
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 8:30 PM, Niall Pemberton
> wrote:
> > The process for accept a podling and the initial code base is pretty
> clear,
> > since it undergoes an IPMC vote.
> >
> > But what happens when there are additional chunks of
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 8:30 PM, Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> The process for accept a podling and the initial code base is pretty clear,
> since it undergoes an IPMC vote.
>
> But what happens when there are additional chunks of code donated during
> incubation? Is that OK under the original IPMC vot
The process for accept a podling and the initial code base is pretty clear,
since it undergoes an IPMC vote.
But what happens when there are additional chunks of code donated during
incubation? Is that OK under the original IPMC vote and the grant just
needs recording with the secretary or should
License-wise, any expectation of problems from the GPL and LGPL
dependencies?
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 9:58 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) <
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
> Great Hen, we’d love to have you on board as a mentor! Please
> add yourself to the proposal on the wiki.
>
> Anyone el
+1 (binding).
-jakob
On 19 January 2016 at 13:45, Justin Mclean wrote:
> HI,
>
> +1 binding
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: genera
HI,
+1 binding
Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1 [binding]
Verified:
- signature (ok). [1]
- sha512 checksum (ok)
- licenses (ok) [2]
- tag (ok)
- build from sources (ok) [3]
[1] The signing key isn't available from the release area's KEYS file. Please
update ASAP
[2] Every time I need to verify the release I have to spend like half an ho
This passes per lazy-consesus.
Thanks, all.
Josh Elser wrote:
All,
Please review the following IP clearance form to bring in the "KOYA"
project into the Apache Slider podling.
http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/slider-koya.html
This sign-off is subject to lazy consensus and is open unt
Dear Ben,
Awesome! We would love to have you as a member of the project.
Please add your name to the wiki as a committer/PPMC member and
happy to have ya!
Cheers,
Chris
++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect
Instrument Software a
Hi Chris,
I am very interested in this project. I am a senior java architect, I have
been worked on java for about 15 years, and various project related to
Lucene and NLP. Please advise how can I participate it.
Thanks,
-Ben
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 12:58 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) <
chris.a.ma
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 7:21 AM, Tom Barber wrote:
> Can someone give my tombarber incubator wiki account write access please?
Done.
Marvin Humphrey
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additio
Can someone give my tombarber incubator wiki account write access please?
Thanks
Tom
More the merrier, add yourself to the proposal Tom as a mentor and/or
committer.
Cheers,
Chris
++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasaden
Thanks JB, no problem. You are welcome to join so again I will call
a VOTE in a few days, so please add yourself before then. Cheers.
++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
Hi Tommaso,
sure yes please add yourself to the proposal as a committer and/or
Mentor. Thank you!
Cheers,
Chris
++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
NASA Jet Propulsion
I want to encourage more IPMC members to cast a vote, in case this
thread went unnoticed.
Cheers,
Hadrian
On 01/16/2016 03:40 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
The vote is as usually open for at least 72 hours.
Here's my +1.
Hadrian
On 01/16/2016 03:12 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
Hi,
The iota pr
I liked the talk which Lewis gave at ApacheCon, if I can be of assistance,
let me know.
Tom
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> I would be honoured. However, as I'm champion on other coming proposals,
> and to keep a good help level, I prefer to wait a couple of days
Thanks!
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 5:10 AM John D. Ament wrote:
> I'm unable to compile/run due to some of the issues noted by ian, just that
> I'm not as willing to install older java versions to make it work.
>
> Anyways, it seems like some of these issues are alleviated in your master
> branch,
I would be honoured. However, as I'm champion on other coming proposals,
and to keep a good help level, I prefer to wait a couple of days to see
if others jump in. If you need an additional mentor, please let me know.
Thanks Chris !
Regards
JB
On 01/19/2016 08:11 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) w
27 matches
Mail list logo
