Re: [Drill] - Re: Shepherd assignments, September 2013

2013-09-12 Thread Dave Fisher
Hi - Well I was late with my retraction. So, I did so to the board directly and with the report. Sorry for any consternation. Best of luck. I do think that once your podling does release that TLP status should come soon. Regards, Dave On Sep 12, 2013, at 11:53 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > Hi Ted

Re: [VOTE] Accept Storm into the Incubator

2013-09-12 Thread Matt Franklin
+1 On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Discussion about the Storm proposal has subsided, issues raised now > seemingly resolved. > > I'd like to call a vote to accept Storm as a new Incubator podling. > > The proposal is included below and is also at: > > https://wiki.apach

Re: [Drill] - Re: Shepherd assignments, September 2013

2013-09-12 Thread Dave Fisher
Hi Ted, OK. I did a look through the dev archives and while quick I really did not see a conversation. However, on second look I do see it. The list is very active and it was hard to see. I am rephrasing my shepherds comments. Thanks, Dave On Sep 10, 2013, at 9:18 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > D

Re: [VOTE] Accept Storm into the Incubator

2013-09-12 Thread Ashish
+1 (non-binding) On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:49 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Discussion about the Storm proposal has subsided, issues raised now > seemingly resolved. > > I'd like to call a vote to accept Storm as a new Incubator podling. > > The proposal is included below and is also at: > > htt

Re: [VOTE] Accept Storm into the Incubator

2013-09-12 Thread Ralph Goers
+1 Ralph On Sep 12, 2013, at 12:19 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Discussion about the Storm proposal has subsided, issues raised now > seemingly resolved. > > I'd like to call a vote to accept Storm as a new Incubator podling. > > The proposal is included below and is also at: > > https://wiki.a

[DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Apache Monitoring

2013-09-12 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hi Folks, Below is a proposal for a new incubator project called Apache Monitoring. (the name will certainly change as I imagine few people won't be happy if we request to be able to use monitoring.a.o as website :-) ). https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MonitoringProposal The source code is curre

Re: [VOTE] Accept Storm into the Incubator

2013-09-12 Thread Andrei Savu
+1 (binding) -- Andrei Savu / axemblr.com On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 10:19 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Discussion about the Storm proposal has subsided, issues raised now > seemingly resolved. > > I'd like to call a vote to accept Storm as a new Incubator podling. > > The proposal is included below

Re: [VOTE] Accept Storm into the Incubator

2013-09-12 Thread Olivier Lamy
+1 (binding) On 13 September 2013 05:19, Doug Cutting wrote: > Discussion about the Storm proposal has subsided, issues raised now > seemingly resolved. > > I'd like to call a vote to accept Storm as a new Incubator podling. > > The proposal is included below and is also at: > > https://wiki.ap

Re: [VOTE] Accept Storm into the Incubator

2013-09-12 Thread Henry Saputra
+1 (binding) On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Discussion about the Storm proposal has subsided, issues raised now > seemingly resolved. > > I'd like to call a vote to accept Storm as a new Incubator podling. > > The proposal is included below and is also at: > > https:/

Re: [VOTE] Accept Storm into the Incubator

2013-09-12 Thread Ted Dunning
+1 (binding) Sent from my iPhone On Sep 12, 2013, at 12:19, Doug Cutting wrote: > Discussion about the Storm proposal has subsided, issues raised now > seemingly resolved. > > I'd like to call a vote to accept Storm as a new Incubator podling. > > The proposal is included below and is also at

Re: [VOTE] Accept Storm into the Incubator

2013-09-12 Thread Leif Hedstrom
On Sep 12, 2013, at 1:19 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Discussion about the Storm proposal has subsided, issues raised now > seemingly resolved. > > I'd like to call a vote to accept Storm as a new Incubator podling. > > The proposal is included below and is also at: > > https://wiki.apache.org/

Re: [Drill] - Re: Shepherd assignments, September 2013

2013-09-12 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > I am rephrasing my shepherds comments. The report was filed last night, one week in advance of the monthly meeting as per the Board's stated deadline. In order to avert a messy post-deadline debate about exactly what should language should

Re: [VOTE] Accept Storm into the Incubator

2013-09-12 Thread Craig L Russell
+1 Craig On Sep 12, 2013, at 12:19 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Discussion about the Storm proposal has subsided, issues raised now > seemingly resolved. > > I'd like to call a vote to accept Storm as a new Incubator podling. > > The proposal is included below and is also at: > > https://wiki.a

Re: [VOTE] Accept Storm into the Incubator

2013-09-12 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
On Sep 12, 2013, at 12:19 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > [ ] +1 Accept Storm into the Incubator > [ ] +0 Don't care. > [ ] -1 Don't accept Storm because... +1 - binding Regards, Alan

Re: [VOTE] Accept Storm into the Incubator

2013-09-12 Thread Debo Dutta (dedutta)
+1 On 9/12/13 12:19 PM, "Doug Cutting" wrote: >Discussion about the Storm proposal has subsided, issues raised now >seemingly resolved. > >I'd like to call a vote to accept Storm as a new Incubator podling. > >The proposal is included below and is also at: > > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/

[VOTE] Accept Storm into the Incubator

2013-09-12 Thread Doug Cutting
Discussion about the Storm proposal has subsided, issues raised now seemingly resolved. I'd like to call a vote to accept Storm as a new Incubator podling. The proposal is included below and is also at: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/StormProposal Let's keep the vote open for four working