On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 3:59 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 08/09/2009, Luciano Resende wrote:
>> Based on the current active members of the community, it's then going
>> to be hard to get this release out !!!
>
> If by community you mean the IPMC, then the lack of response is
> perhaps because AFAICT there
On 08/09/2009, Luciano Resende wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 3:33 PM, sebb wrote:
> > On 08/09/2009, Luciano Resende wrote:
> >> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 2:42 PM, sebb wrote:
> >> > On 04/09/2009, Luciano Resende wrote:
> >> >> A new RC is now available which should fix the items mentioned
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 3:33 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 08/09/2009, Luciano Resende wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 2:42 PM, sebb wrote:
>> > On 04/09/2009, Luciano Resende wrote:
>> >> A new RC is now available which should fix the items mentioned, please
>> >> see details below :
>> >
>> > Loo
On 08/09/2009, Luciano Resende wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 2:42 PM, sebb wrote:
> > On 04/09/2009, Luciano Resende wrote:
> >> A new RC is now available which should fix the items mentioned, please
> >> see details below :
> >
> > Looks OK now - the issues I raised have been fixed, tha
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 2:42 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 04/09/2009, Luciano Resende wrote:
>> A new RC is now available which should fix the items mentioned, please
>> see details below :
>
> Looks OK now - the issues I raised have been fixed, thanks.
This is great news, thanks for all your effort hel
Hi Jeremy,
Since you are asking about potential committers - at least to me a new
OSGi project focused on Java EE sounds quite interesting.
Btw, when looking at the proposal I would personally suggest even to
expand the scope and include other Java enterprise concepts - for
example integration w
On 04/09/2009, Luciano Resende wrote:
> A new RC is now available which should fix the items mentioned, please
> see details below :
Looks OK now - the issues I raised have been fixed, thanks.
> ---
>
>
> The artifacts are available for review at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~lresende/phota
On 08/09/2009, Eric Evans wrote:
>
> Attached are draft copies of LICENSE and NOTICE files for the cassandra
> project.
>
> LICENSE is monolithic, it contains a copy of all licenses. It is meant
> to replace the texts we currently keep in lib/licenses.
>
> NOTICE contains an entry for all the
Attached are draft copies of LICENSE and NOTICE files for the cassandra
project.
LICENSE is monolithic, it contains a copy of all licenses. It is meant
to replace the texts we currently keep in lib/licenses.
NOTICE contains an entry for all the third-party libraries in our tree
(in so much as th
Hi,
The Empire-db community has completed working on Release 2.0.5 and is
now looking for approval of the IPMC to publish the release. Since our
previous attempt failed on general@ we prepared a fifth release
candidate.
These are the major change from our previous 2.0.4 release:
- Maven project m
Doh cancel that, apparently the shared javascript now contains a number of
java specific files (ie: rhino and some shell scripts)
Paul, Vincent: Would it be possible to rm -rf features/bin in the php part
of the packaging? It seems a bit silly to include rhino and it's license if
it's not used.
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Leo Simons wrote:
>
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/shindig-staging-041/org/apache/shindig/shindig/1.1-BETA2-incubating/shindig-1.1-BETA2-incubating-php.tar.gz
>
> has a similar problem -- it ships rhino but the MPL and such are not
> in the
Hey Paul,
My vote: -1 (IPMC, binding). Mostly due to some legal tidbits.
I've started looking at this release, but, I *really* don't have the
time to look through 100s of artifacts (I imagine much the same is
true for the shindig committers?!?), so I can't +1 all these files. It
would be a lot ea
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 12:30, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
> Hi;
>
> I would like to specify some concerns about podling release procedure.
>
> As an experienced podling releaser guy from the OpenWebBeans podling , it
> takes too much days to release internal milestones of the project. I know
> that podli
Hi;
I would like to specify some concerns about podling release procedure.
As an experienced podling releaser guy from the OpenWebBeans podling , it
takes too much days to release internal milestones of the project. I know
that podling mentors/committers may delay to VOTE because of doing other
b
Sorry to waste your time...
I just went to remove this committer and realised they are not named
as an initial committer after all. So no changes needed to the
proposal.
Ross
2009/9/8 Ross Gardler :
> During the due dilligence process for Wookie one of the named initial
> committers refused to s
During the due dilligence process for Wookie one of the named initial
committers refused to sign the iCLA. Upon investigation it emerged
that the author was not sure of the provenance of some of his commits.
I have no concerns about the code being brought into the ASF as the
questionable code has
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 8:41 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> ...Time is running out for reports. If it is your tiime to report, make
> sure it is in by tomorrow.
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/September2009...
And mentors, please sign off your podling's reports when you review them.
-Bertrand
18 matches
Mail list logo
