Sorry to waste your time... I just went to remove this committer and realised they are not named as an initial committer after all. So no changes needed to the proposal.
Ross 2009/9/8 Ross Gardler <rgard...@apache.org>: > During the due dilligence process for Wookie one of the named initial > committers refused to sign the iCLA. Upon investigation it emerged > that the author was not sure of the provenance of some of his commits. > > I have no concerns about the code being brought into the ASF as the > questionable code has been removed or rewritten (see quote from Scott > below), but since this person is not signing a iCLA it means I need to > remove him from the Wookie proposal. This will leave two initial > committers both of whom have filed iCLAs. > > I assume that there is no need to call a new vote on acceptance of > Wookie, and will proceed regardless. However, if someone has a concern > please raise it. > > Ross > > PS re removal of questionable code Scott Wilson says: "With his > cooperation I've now removed all his code from the project, and > replaced it with new code I've written (and where this is derived from > public examples/how-tos, noted this in comments). This wasn't a big > job; most of the code wasn't actually called by the current codebase > and could be safely removed without being replaced." > > > -- > Ross Gardler > > OSS Watch - supporting open source in education and research > http://www.oss-watch.ac.uk > -- Ross Gardler OSS Watch - supporting open source in education and research http://www.oss-watch.ac.uk --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
