On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:56 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 31/03/2008, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ... None of the build scripts contain license headers. Given that the
> build
> > scripts are everyday, normal maven build scripts, I do believe they
> > qualify u
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Mar 31, 2008, at 11:06 AM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
Please note the *Releases may not be vetoed.* part.
[1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
Thanks. My bad. I should have not used to word, veto.
With a caviat that a true licensing issue would be enou
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 11:15 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-1: there should be NOTICE and LICENSE files at the top level in SVN.
-1: SVN and the source archive don't agree; there are files and
directories in each that are not in the other.
Could you please reco
On 31/03/2008, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sebb wrote:
> >
> >> > The NOTICE file is for required attribtions ONLY (e.g. as per an About
> box)
> >> > There's really no need to repeat ASF for each project used by Abdera.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Having too much information in the N
On 31/03/2008, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the FAQ I see this: "A file without any degree of creativity in
> either its literal elements or its structure is not protected by
> copyright law; therefore, such a file does not require a license header.
Yes, but:
> If in doubt ab
I'd probably error on the side of caution here, and add license
headers in all files, unless it breakes something. Most if not all
projects does add the license headers in maven pom files, property
files, etc. I'd suggest you to fix at least in trunk, but as you
mentioned you need to fix the the fi
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 9:12 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a question on
> http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.html
> .
>
> Does this apply if the project is already ASL 2.0 or can it just be
> submitted to the project via JIRA? I w
sebb wrote:
> The NOTICE file is for required attribtions ONLY (e.g. as per an About box)
> There's really no need to repeat ASF for each project used by Abdera.
>
Having too much information in the NOTICE files is not a crime. The
Maven remote-resources plugin aggregates all this stuff fo
I'm closing this vote as passed.
There are 5 binding +1 votes from:
jim, jstrachan, bsnyder, jgenender, gnodet
which is enough to do the release.
There is one -1 from sebbaz, but there are debates about whether it's
undocumented policy related or personal preference and that debate
shouldn't h
In the FAQ I see this: "A file without any degree of creativity in
either its literal elements or its structure is not protected by
copyright law; therefore, such a file does not require a license header.
If in doubt about the extent of the file's creativity, add the license
header to the file
Hi,
I have a question on http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.html
.
Does this apply if the project is already ASL 2.0 or can it just be
submitted to the project via JIRA? I would say the project qualifies
as "substantial", but it only has one maintainer and they
Thanks.
There are quite a few problems with the SVN properties; see script at
http://people.apache.org/~sebb/SVNfixes/
(which should work on Unix - and in a DOS box if suitably
named)
These are not critical to the release, but not having them causes
problems when working across systems with
On 31/03/2008, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 31 March 2008, sebb wrote:
> > On 31/03/2008, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 11:15 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > -1: there should be NOTICE and LICENSE files at the top level
On 31/03/2008, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sebb wrote:
> > On 31/03/2008, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >
>
> > -1: There are MD5 and SHA1 digests in the directory, but the archives
> > have no signatures.
> >
> >
>
> OK, I will fix this.
>
> >> Maven Re
On Mar 31, 2008, at 11:06 AM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
On 3/31/08, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mar 31, 2008, at 4:41 AM, sebb wrote:
On 31/03/2008, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 11:15 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-1: there should
Oops hit "ctrl enter" instead of "ctrl-v enter". Here's the tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/abdera/java/tags/abdera-0.4.0-incubating/
Dan
Dan Diephouse wrote:
I removed the empty sources jar and tagged the release:
Dan Diephouse wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 31/03/2008, James M Snel
I removed the empty sources jar and tagged the release:
Dan Diephouse wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 31/03/2008, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-1: There are MD5 and SHA1 digests in the directory, but the archives
have no signatures.
OK, I will fix this.
Maven Repository: http:
True, but I usually feel better when all -1's concerns have been addressed.
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 8:06 PM, Martijn Dashorst <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/31/08, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mar 31, 2008, at 4:41 AM, sebb wrote:
> > > On 31/03/2008, Guillaume Nodet <[
On 3/31/08, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mar 31, 2008, at 4:41 AM, sebb wrote:
> > On 31/03/2008, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 11:15 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> -1: there should be NOTICE and LICENSE files at the top le
On Mar 31, 2008, at 4:41 AM, sebb wrote:
On 31/03/2008, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 11:15 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-1: there should be NOTICE and LICENSE files at the top level in
SVN.
May I suggest resolving this via Legal discuss?
It's
sebb wrote:
On 31/03/2008, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-1: There are MD5 and SHA1 digests in the directory, but the archives
have no signatures.
OK, I will fix this.
Maven Repository: http://people.apache.org/~dandiep/abdera-take6/
-0: The abdera-bundle-0.4.0
On 31/03/2008, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Abdera project has resolved the issues raised previously and have
> voted to release a new build of the 0.4.0-incubating release.
>
> Binary distributions:
>
>
> http://people.apache.org/~dandiep/abdera-take6/org/apache/abdera/apache
The Abdera project has resolved the issues raised previously and have
voted to release a new build of the 0.4.0-incubating release.
Binary distributions:
http://people.apache.org/~dandiep/abdera-take6/org/apache/abdera/apache-abdera/0.4.0-incubating/apache-abdera-0.4.0-incubating.zip
http://peo
On Monday 31 March 2008, sebb wrote:
> On 31/03/2008, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 11:15 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > -1: there should be NOTICE and LICENSE files at the top level in
> > > SVN.
>
> May I suggest resolving this via Legal discuss
On 31/03/2008, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 11:15 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > -1: there should be NOTICE and LICENSE files at the top level in SVN.
May I suggest resolving this via Legal discuss?
It's also pretty easy to add the two files t
On Monday 31 March 2008 01:19, Matthieu Riou wrote:
> So what makes you pretty sure public access to a SCM amounts to
> distribution in the definition of publication? AFAICT, there's still no
> purpose of distribution.
If I take various chapters of Copyrighted material (books, music) and make it
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 11:15 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> -1: there should be NOTICE and LICENSE files at the top level in SVN.
>
> -1: SVN and the source archive don't agree; there are files and
> directories in each that are not in the other.
>
>
Could you please reconsider your vote
It's been more than the 72 hours required, so I'll go ahead and
close this thread and let the project know that the code has been
cleared for import.
regards,
Matthias
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oracle has contributed some new translation me
28 matches
Mail list logo
