On Monday 31 March 2008, sebb wrote: > On 31/03/2008, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 11:15 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > -1: there should be NOTICE and LICENSE files at the top level in > > > SVN. > > May I suggest resolving this via Legal discuss? > It's also pretty easy to add the two files to SVN...
Fine. We'll take that under advisement for 2.0.6 as legal-discuss and other discussions figure it out. For 2.0.5, I don't think we should be changing requirements in the middle of a vote. The current setup has been fine for MANY releases from CXF and from other projects. Once legal or whomever finalizes things, we can adjust, but that shouldn't hold up the 2.0.5 release. > > > -1: SVN and the source archive don't agree; there are files and > > > directories in each that are not in the other. > > I can understand why you may wish to omit the bin and benchmark > directories, but I think consumers expect to find everything they need > in the archives; it should not be necessary to retrieve additional > files from SVN. > > Are the following directories really not needed in the source archive? > > distribution/src/main/release/samples/callback/build > distribution/src/main/release/samples/ws_policy/build > distribution/src/main/release/samples/ws_rm/build No. They are empty directories that shouldn't be in svn either. I've gone ahead and deleted them on trunk. Will get the 2.0.x branch in a bit. But it's pretty irrelevant for the 2.0.5 release. > Also build.xml Which is ONLY there for the cruisecontrol instance we have running inside IONA. It's relatively specific to that machine and thus is not something that should be "released" like the benchmark dir. It's a specific file that is there to make sure the builds keep running smoothly and devs don't break the build. Dan > > Could you please reconsider your vote? AFAIK, we have always voted > > on releases, not on the SVN tag. The tag is just a way to > > (re-)build the release and not something we vote on and distribute. > > Furthermore, there's no policies yet around these issues that are > > still being discussed. > > > > > > > > -- > > Cheers, > > Guillaume Nodet > > ------------------------ > > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- J. Daniel Kulp Principal Engineer, IONA [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.dankulp.com/blog --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
