On 31/03/2008, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 11:15 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > -1: there should be NOTICE and LICENSE files at the top level in SVN.
May I suggest resolving this via Legal discuss? It's also pretty easy to add the two files to SVN... > > -1: SVN and the source archive don't agree; there are files and > > directories in each that are not in the other. > > I can understand why you may wish to omit the bin and benchmark directories, but I think consumers expect to find everything they need in the archives; it should not be necessary to retrieve additional files from SVN. Are the following directories really not needed in the source archive? distribution/src/main/release/samples/callback/build distribution/src/main/release/samples/ws_policy/build distribution/src/main/release/samples/ws_rm/build Also build.xml > > > > Could you please reconsider your vote? AFAIK, we have always voted on > releases, not on the SVN tag. The tag is just a way to (re-)build the > release and not something we vote on and distribute. Furthermore, there's > no policies yet around these issues that are still being discussed. > > > > -- > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > ------------------------ > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
