On Nov 16, 2007 11:31 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 15, 2007 12:32 AM, James Margaris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Right now posting on the lists feels like playing to an empty theater.
>
> i can appreciate why you say this. i prefer to think of it as
> conducti
On Nov 15, 2007 12:32 AM, James Margaris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am one of the pimary committers on XAP. As far as the board report, I just
> plain missed it until it was too late.
hi james
> As far as the community building is concerned, yes the lists are basically
> dead. However work
Hiya!
One of my contributors is asking if either the CLA or the Software
Grant are available in other languages than English (French, Dutch or
German preferred).
Couldn't find anything directly off the Apache website... Any knowledge?
/Janne
---
Hi Kevan,
We rebuild the java RC after cleaning up the dependencies.
Since there are no code changes (except for one file which removed
references to commons logging) and only POM changes, we decided to restart
the vote on incubator list. We have also communicated the message to the
qpid list.
He
On Nov 16, 2007, at 2:09 AM, Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi, Kevan.
Thank you for the review. We have fixed the issue and republished a
RC5a at:
SVN Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.0.1-RC5a/
Stage maven repo: http://people.apache.org/~rfeng/tuscany/maven/1.0
On Nov 16, 2007 2:48 PM, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know what configuring an exception means...
The Ant and Maven plugins allow to configure files, which are not
being inspected by RAT.
--
Look, that's why there's rules, understand? So that you think before
you break '
On Nov 16, 2007, at 5:40 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
On Nov 16, 2007 2:36 PM, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Would it be reasonable to expect that a file called CHANGES contains
implied content?
I do not know what you mean by "implied"
I meant that CHANGES can be assumed to b
On Nov 16, 2007 2:36 PM, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would it be reasonable to expect that a file called CHANGES contains
> implied content?
I do not know what you mean by "implied", but in the most cases I am
aware of, the CHANGES file is typically something on which RAT should
I notice in the Tuscany SCA RAT report:
!? 1.0.1-RC5a/distribution/src/main/release/CHANGES
Would it be reasonable to expect that a file called CHANGES contains
implied content?
Regards,
Craig
Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5
