On Nov 16, 2007, at 5:40 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
On Nov 16, 2007 2:36 PM, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Would it be reasonable to expect that a file called CHANGES contains implied content?I do not know what you mean by "implied"
I meant that CHANGES can be assumed to be a text file containing a list of changes from previous releases.
, but in the most cases I am aware of, the CHANGES file is typically something on which RAT should not have any assumptions.
And I think that RAT should assume that there is no IP contained therein and mark it as a notice type, as in:
N 1.0.1-RC5a/distribution/src/main/release/CHANGES
IMO, this is something for which the project administrator should configure an exception.
I don't know what configuring an exception means... Regards, Craig
Jochen
--
Look, that's why there's rules, understand? So that you think before
you break 'em.
-- (Terry Pratchett, Thief of Time)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
