On Nov 16, 2007 2:36 PM, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Would it be reasonable to expect that a file called CHANGES contains
> implied content?

I do not know what you mean by "implied", but in the most cases I am
aware of, the CHANGES file is typically something on which RAT should
not have any assumptions.

IMO, this is something for which the project administrator should
configure an exception.


Jochen


-- 
Look, that's why there's rules, understand? So that you think before
you break 'em.

    -- (Terry Pratchett, Thief of Time)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to