Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.6-incubating release

On Nov 30, 2006, at 1:19 PM, Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote: Kevan- Would you be amenable to having a single NOTICE file, but changing the wording to: "The OpenJPA binary zip distribution is bundled with the..." ? Hi Marc, Well, actually on closer reading of your LICENSE file, it looks like

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.0-M1 Incubating Release

On 11/30/06, Jean T. Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jean T. Anderson wrote: > robert burrell donkin wrote: >>On 11/30/06, Jean T. Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>Jim Jagielski wrote: > ... The release_notes.txt in the docs folder of the release build refer to Apache CXF and no

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.0-M1 Incubating Release

On 11/30/06, Jean T. Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: robert burrell donkin wrote: > On 11/30/06, Jean T. Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Jim Jagielski wrote: >> > ... >> > The release_notes.txt in the docs folder >> > of the release build refer to Apache CXF and not Apache >> > Incub

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.0-M1 Incubating Release

Jean T. Anderson wrote: > robert burrell donkin wrote: >>On 11/30/06, Jean T. Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>Jim Jagielski wrote: > ... The release_notes.txt in the docs folder of the release build refer to Apache CXF and not Apache Incubator CXF. This should be fixed :) >>> >>

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.0-M1 Incubating Release

robert burrell donkin wrote: > On 11/30/06, Jean T. Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Jim Jagielski wrote: >> > ... >> > The release_notes.txt in the docs folder >> > of the release build refer to Apache CXF and not Apache >> > Incubator CXF. This should be fixed :) >> >> actually, the bran

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.0-M1 Incubating Release

On 11/30/06, Jean T. Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jim Jagielski wrote: > > On Nov 29, 2006, at 11:50 AM, Dan Diephouse wrote: > >> The Apache CXF team has cut another candidate release which fixes the >> previous licensing issues. Builds have been published here: >> >> Binaries and Source

OFBiz Graduation

Hello, since this hasn't been posted by anyone else, I thought I would help move it along. The vote is recorded here: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200611.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] This was also voted on here: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ofbiz-

Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.6-incubating release

Kevan- Would you be amenable to having a single NOTICE file, but changing the wording to: "The OpenJPA binary zip distribution is bundled with the..." ? On Nov 30, 2006, at 8:43 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: On Nov 18, 2006, at 9:49 AM, robert burrell donkin wrote: On 11/17/06, Marc Prud

Re: eclipse-plugin for existing project

Hi all, I am developing an eclipse-plugin for Qpid project. Can someone give me any pointer to other eclipse-plugins, which are developed like an independent module and being built with maven2. I mainly need to look at how those are structured and being distributed. Regards, Bhupendra

eclipse-plugin for existing project

Hi all, I am developing an eclipse-plugin for Qpid project. Can someone give me any pointer to other eclipse-plugins, which are developed like an independent module and being built with maven2. I mainly need to look at how those are structured and being distributed. Regards, Bhupendra

Re: Voting a release in the podling list with IPMC binding votes, was: Re: Notification of a(nother) release vote for Tuscany

Apologies, wrong list. On 11/30/06, Jeremy Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: FYI all budding Woden release managers ... a vote on [EMAIL PROTECTED] may be unnecessary ... On 11/29/06, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/24/06, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So,

Re: Voting a release in the podling list with IPMC binding votes, was: Re: Notification of a(nother) release vote for Tuscany

FYI all budding Woden release managers ... a vote on [EMAIL PROTECTED] may be unnecessary ... On 11/29/06, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/24/06, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So, just to make sure I understand it now, even tough we might have three +1 > IPMC bi

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.0-M1 Incubating Release

Jim Jagielski wrote: > > On Nov 29, 2006, at 11:50 AM, Dan Diephouse wrote: > >> The Apache CXF team has cut another candidate release which fixes the >> previous licensing issues. Builds have been published here: >> >> Binaries and Source Distributions: >> http://people.apache.org/~blin/incubato

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.0-M1 Incubating Release

Is this a show stopper and a -1? Can we fix this as part of our next milestone? On 11/30/06, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Nov 29, 2006, at 11:50 AM, Dan Diephouse wrote: > The Apache CXF team has cut another candidate release which fixes the > previous licensing issues. Builds

Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.6-incubating release

On Nov 18, 2006, at 9:49 AM, robert burrell donkin wrote: On 11/17/06, Marc Prud'hommeaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Nov 16, 2006, at 12:57 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote: > -- questions -- > > i can't find LICENSE, NOTICE or DISCLAIMER in > openjpa-all-0.9.6-incubating.jar. did you i

RE: [VOTE] Publish Yoko M1 release

Hi, Here are the two votes so far - can another mentor please help us get this milestone released. Thanks, Edell. -Original Message- From: Jukka Zitting [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 November 2006 23:49 To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Publish Yoko M1 release

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.0-M1 Incubating Release

On Nov 29, 2006, at 11:50 AM, Dan Diephouse wrote: The Apache CXF team has cut another candidate release which fixes the previous licensing issues. Builds have been published here: Binaries and Source Distributions: http://people.apache.org/~blin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1/people.apache.org/%7Eblin/