On 11/30/06, Jean T. Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jean T. Anderson wrote:
> robert burrell donkin wrote:
>>On 11/30/06, Jean T. Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>Jim Jagielski wrote:
> ...
>>>>The release_notes.txt in the docs folder
>>>>of the release build refer to Apache CXF and not Apache
>>>>Incubator CXF. This should be fixed :)
>>>
>>>actually, the branding page [1] says "the podling MUST be referred to as
>>>Apache "Podling-Name" AND mention that the project is under Incubation."
>>>
>>>I don't believe "Incubator" must be in the actual name as long as
>>>mention of incubation is made. Right?
>>
>>that's how i read that document too
>>
>>but on the normative
>>http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Podling+Constraints
>>
>>there is:
>>
>>"Should the Incubator PMC, in accordance with these guidelines vote to
>>approve the request, the Podling MAY perform the release under the
>>following constraints :
>>
>> * the release archive MUST contain the word "incubating" in the
>>filename; and
>> * the release archive MUST contain an Incubation disclaimer (as
>>described in the previous section), clearly visible in the main
>>documentation or README file."
>>
>>since it's policy, it is a blocker
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
my mistake
> I think cxf is ok -- their file has "incubating" in the name (I
er ... um ... ok, the filename has "incubator" in the name, not
"incubating". :-)
i try not to be that pedantic
IMHO this sentence could have been phrased better
- robert
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
