Hi Ian,
Thanks for your reply. In brief, the answer to your final question
is that information currency is a representation of property rights to
the underlying information. However, information currency is not
designed to restrict the distribution of the underlying information in
any way - it
Upayavira wrote:
> Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>> FYI: this is a majority vote not subject to vetos. So, there's no
>> requirement that you provide a reason for voting against it - just
>> like you don't have to provide a reason why you're voting for it. If
>> you want to provide a reason, great, bu
Hi.
on the initial read, I wasn't exactly sure what it was this service
was doing.
although I think I know what a financial instrument is, I've usually
only seen them
applied to their regular things.. stocks, bonds, futures, options,
etc... not information.
so I was a bit confused.. who
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On 8/24/06, Upayavira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [ ] +1 Accept Wicket as an Incubator podling
>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>> [ ] -1 Reject this proposal for the following reason:
>
> FYI: this is a majority vote not subject to vetos. So, there's no
> requirement that you pr
Hi there,
I've been looking at the apache ftp server as a solution for one of
my projects. It looks really promising but I would like to get my
hands on more documentation. Do you know if there's more info out
there apart from http://incubator.apache.org/ftpserver/. I've googled
without
this is a dupe.
I sent it from my apache.org address initially which wasn't subscribed.
I did forget to mention the wiki page: http://wiki.apache.org/
incubator/FluorideProposal
in the original too.
On 24/08/2006, at 6:59 AM, Ian Holsman wrote:
Fluoride, a Feed Server Proposal
0. Rationale
Fluoride, a Feed Server Proposal
0. Rationale
a RSS/Atom feed by default is hard to track. The aim of this proposal
is to create a server which can track statistics on who is reading
your feeds, and what they are reading.
0.1 Criteria
Meritocracy:
Apache was chosen for an incubator for the
Fluoride, a Feed Server Proposal
0. Rationale
a RSS/Atom feed by default is hard to track. The aim of this proposal
is to create a server which can track statistics on who is reading
your feeds, and what they are reading.
0.1 Criteria
Meritocracy:
Apache was chosen for an incubator for the
The Unstructured Information Management Architecture (UIMA) is an
architecture and software framework for creating, discovering, composing
and deploying a broad range of multi-modal analysis capabilities. We
propose a project to develop, implement, support and enhance UIMA
framework implementatio
Upayavira wrote:
[X] +1 Accept Wicket as an Incubator podling
+1, non-binding
Ross
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I didn't object... I voted -0 based on the information I was pointed
out, which (as you said) is not a very good comparison point.
*shrug*
Sorry if I came across too strongly. Igor pointed out my reply had a
bit of a zealous tone to it. My only goal was to explain the idea
behind Wicket a bit.
On 8/24/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
I'm developing a desktop application. You can object to the importance
we give to providing a clean OO model, and argue that our tradeoffs
are ill chosen, but I believe Wicket fills a gap in the web framework
sphere.
I didn't object...
On 8/24/06, Greg Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/24/06, Ersin Er <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>...
> Wicket vs. Struts: http://www.wicket-wiki.org.uk/wiki/index.php/Struts
Bleh. That page confuses a lot of things. It conflates disparate
components (e.g. Struts and JSP) in order to form opini
Hi,
I'm submitting this proposal because of my desire to contribute to
the ASF and, especially, because the project proposed for incubation
is particularly directed toward creating new tools for ASF developers
to work more efficiently and derive greater rewards from their
open-source work.
I
+1 (non-binding)
On 8/24/06, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
+1.
Yoav
On 8/24/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
>
> On 8/24/06, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 8/24/06, Upayavira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > So, please cast your votes:
> > >
> >
Hi,
+1.
Yoav
On 8/24/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
On 8/24/06, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/24/06, Upayavira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So, please cast your votes:
> >
> > [X] +1 Accept Wicket as an Incubator podling
> > [ ] 0 Don't care
> > [ ] -1 Rej
On 8/24/06, Upayavira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ ] +1 Accept Wicket as an Incubator podling
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Reject this proposal for the following reason:
FYI: this is a majority vote not subject to vetos. So, there's no
requirement that you provide a reason for voting against it -
+1
On 8/24/06, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/24/06, Upayavira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, please cast your votes:
>
> [X] +1 Accept Wicket as an Incubator podling
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Reject this proposal for the following reason
On 8/24/06, Upayavira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So, please cast your votes:
[X] +1 Accept Wicket as an Incubator podling
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Reject this proposal for the following reason
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Hi,
On 8/22/06, Jim Hurley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We would like to include the API docs ("specifications" seems to
be a loaded term, with many different definitions and assumptions
tied up in it) in the project.
OK. So the scope of a revised proposal would be broader than just the
implemen
On 8/24/06, Upayavira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> ...Not sure if binding or not, I've signed up as a mentor for Wicket but
> didn't participate in incubator activities before.
Currently non-binding. But, as an ASF member, you should ask the
Incubator PMC to join.
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 03:18, Jim Hurley wrote:
We, therefore, are open to discussing a name change to something
else within the Jini Community.
If there's agreement on the positions stated in 1 and 2 above,
we'll assume there's general support for our Proposal to Apa
While we continue to look forward to your review and
response ;-) thought I'd mention a Jini event coming up
next month:
*
Tenth Jini Community Meeting
Brusse
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On 8/24/06, Upayavira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> ...=== Name ===
>>
>> Obviously, the
>> ...
>
> Looks like something's missing on that line, it ends after "Obviously,
> the".
Not having a good day. That was where I started saying that I'd done a
US trademark se
On 8/24/06, Upayavira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...=== Name ===
Obviously, the
...
Looks like something's missing on that line, it ends after "Obviously, the".
Apart from that: +1.
Not sure if binding or not, I've signed up as a mentor for Wicket but
didn't participate in incubator activit
+1
On 24 Aug 06, at 3:02 AM 24 Aug 06, Upayavira wrote:
Folks,
Without further ado (and before my PC dies again), I'd like to call a
vote on accepting Wicket into the incubator.
As previously mentioned, the Wicket community held a unanimous vote to
approach the incubator. The vote thread is h
Upayavira wrote:
So, please cast your votes:
[X] +1 Accept Wicket as an Incubator podling
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Reject this proposal for the following reason:
+1
Alex
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additi
[X] +1 Accept Wicket as an Incubator podling
/Gwyn
P.S. We'll be happy to discuss "Why Wicket" or the Wicket homepage &
marketing-speak, but I don't think this thread's the place to do it!
--
Download Wicket 1.2.1 now! - http://wicketframework.org
-
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Monday 21 August 2006 03:24, Mark Brouwer wrote:
I would be saddened if we can't maintain "Jini" as project name
I think Mark has put it rather well.
The Jini community want a water cooler to gather around.
Brilliant :-)
--
Mark
I've never used Wicket, but I've done a fair number of webapps using
similar component frameworks, such as WebObjects and Tapestry. All I
can say - it is hard to argue about component frameworks with people
who never used them. The benefit is essentially a different more
developer-friendly
On 8/24/06, Ersin Er <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
Wicket vs. Struts: http://www.wicket-wiki.org.uk/wiki/index.php/Struts
Bleh. That page confuses a lot of things. It conflates disparate
components (e.g. Struts and JSP) in order to form opinions. It appears
that Wicket also does state manageme
On Thursday 24 August 2006 18:16, Greg Stein wrote:
> I would be interested in a comparison of Wicket to things like Struts,
> Jetspeed, Cocoon, or whatever other Apache project might be reasonable
> compared-against. I've got no problem with Wicket beating the pants
> off every other Apache projec
On 24/08/2006, at 8:29 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
The original proposal:
bluntly: f*k the g*dm*d users list. You got zero code, so there is no
purpose to a users list. Fork that out of the dev list if/when it is
appropriate. I'd even suggest sending all commits to the dev list to
start with. All in
+1
Mvgr,
Martin
Upayavira wrote:
Folks,
Without further ado (and before my PC dies again), I'd like to call a
vote on accepting Wicket into the incubator.
As previously mentioned, the Wicket community held a unanimous vote to
approach the incubator. The vote thread is here:
http://www.mail-a
Hi,
I am sure Wicket folks can give more detailed explanations but I want
to say that Wicket has the most elegant approach to web development I
have ever seen. Wicket (and may be other very similar ones) is the
only framework which seperates code and ui _truely_. Other projects of
course have the
On 8/24/06, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 05:51:33PM -0400, Yoav Shapira wrote:
> Do proposed projects by current ASF members need official mentors and
> champions who are different than the proposer?
...
What Noel and others have said in the past is "essentially y
Java web frameworks tend to be a dime a dozen, and they all talk about
their "simplicity". Every one of them. Then I sat thru a Struts
presentation. Gah.
I would be interested in a comparison of Wicket to things like Struts,
Jetspeed, Cocoon, or whatever other Apache project might be reasonable
c
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 12:02:53AM -0700, Upayavira wrote:
> Without further ado (and before my PC dies again), I'd like to call a
> vote on accepting Wicket into the incubator.
> = Wicket Proposal =
>
> This proposal outlines the creation of a new top-level Wicket project
> within the Apache So
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 05:51:33PM -0400, Yoav Shapira wrote:
> Do proposed projects by current ASF members need official mentors and
> champions who are different than the proposer?
Good question. This is the first time we have one like this :)
What Noel and others have said in the past is "esse
+1 (non-binding)
regards,
Martin
On 8/24/06, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thursday 24 August 2006 15:02, Upayavira wrote:
> So, please cast your votes:
> [x] +1 Accept Wicket as an Incubator podling
(non-binding)
Cheers
Niclas
---
On Thursday 24 August 2006 15:02, Upayavira wrote:
> So, please cast your votes:
> [x] +1 Accept Wicket as an Incubator podling
(non-binding)
Cheers
Niclas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-
Searching for '[VOTE]' on the wicket archives isn't enough to find the
relevant vote :-(
Here's the correct link:
http://www.mail-archive.com/wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net/index.html#08853
Upayavira
Upayavira wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Without further ado (and before my PC dies again), I'd lik
+1 (non binding)
--
Download Wicket 1.2.1 now! Embed Wicket components in your portals!
-- http://wicketframework.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Folks,
Without further ado (and before my PC dies again), I'd like to call a
vote on accepting Wicket into the incubator.
As previously mentioned, the Wicket community held a unanimous vote to
approach the incubator. The vote thread is here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/wicket-develop@lists.sourc
44 matches
Mail list logo
