Upayavira wrote: > Justin Erenkrantz wrote: >> FYI: this is a majority vote not subject to vetos. So, there's no >> requirement that you provide a reason for voting against it - just >> like you don't have to provide a reason why you're voting for it. If >> you want to provide a reason, great, but I could just vote against it >> without further comment and that's perfectly fine too. -- justin > > Okay. Thanks for the clarification. I'll try to remember that for the > next podling I propose :-)
Although... an explanation can go a long way to have other pmc members consider the issues, good and bad, that they might have overlooked. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
