Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > On 8/24/06, Upayavira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> [ ] +1 Accept Wicket as an Incubator podling >> [ ] 0 Don't care >> [ ] -1 Reject this proposal for the following reason: > > FYI: this is a majority vote not subject to vetos. So, there's no > requirement that you provide a reason for voting against it - just > like you don't have to provide a reason why you're voting for it. If > you want to provide a reason, great, but I could just vote against it > without further comment and that's perfectly fine too. -- justin
Okay. Thanks for the clarification. I'll try to remember that for the next podling I propose :-) Regards, Upayavira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
