Ok. Here's the proposal http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OdeProposal.
Please feel free to comment.
Bill Flood, can you provide us with the list of Sybase developers that
wish to work on this project? Can you get the Software Grant paperwork
faxed in?
Any other ASF committers want to jump
On 2/13/2006 6:26 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Alan,
* I have no problem with the tarballs, but the plain jars do
not have the disclaimer associated with them.
Any current user of ActiveMQ will have to modify their Maven project
descriptor to change the groupId of activemq to
On 2/13/2006 6:43 PM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Sybase wants to donate to the service-mix community
In other words, they *don't* want to contribute it to Apache.
They want it to go into a specific and particular niche *at*
Apache. Why the specificity? Why d
I'd like to retract this email. I have doubts on both sides of this
and may try to explain them in a clearer way in another message.
My apologies
david jencks
On Feb 13, 2006, at 6:26 PM, David Jencks wrote:
After being nervous for quite a while I have come to think that the
sybase bpel en
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>
> I don't think anyone has said that this isn't a donation to apache.
> Every donation I have seen to apache, has either come to a PMC and is
> sponsored as a IP donation or incubated sub project, or comes
> directly to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>
> I think ServiceMix is the perfect home for a BPEL engine. Every JBI
> implementation that I am aware of has and integrated orchestration
> engine exposed via the BPEL specification. I am not worried about
> "barriers" to
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 05:56:49PM -0800, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> On Feb 13, 2006, at 5:34 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 12:42:58PM -0800, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> >>...
> >>Sybase wants to donate to the service-mix community and the
> >>ServiceMix community wants to work with
On 2/13/2006 11:04 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
The all of the links on http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/
index.html seem to be broken. I'll try to figure out what is wrong,
but if someone has an idea or is already working on it, please let me
know.
Fixed and released.
Regards,
Al
Alan,
> > * The paperwork has not been recorded by the ASF Secretary.
> > * I don't see a Software Grant for any of the code that came
> > over from codehaus.
> I believe that these have been now sent and confirmed.
So we're all caught up on IP grants from every contributor whose code w
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> I am more than willing to rebuild the site, but the xmlbeancxx.xml
> file is really messed up and I don't have the time to fix it right
> now. It is missing most quotes around attribute values and has many
> unclosed xml elements.
It was a copy of a generated html pa
After being nervous for quite a while I have come to think that the
sybase bpel engine should go in as part of servicemix and if further
uses outside servicemix develop we can see about splitting it off.
more comments inline.
On Feb 13, 2006, at 5:25 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Dain Sundst
Jean T. Anderson wrote:
> David Crossley wrote:
> > Jean T. Anderson wrote:
> >>Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> >>>Should be fixed now.
> >>>
> >>>How often does the site update?
> >>
> >>I notice it happens very quickly (a matter of a minute, if even that)
> >>these days after you do the 'svn up' on peopl
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 05:40:47PM -0800, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> On Feb 13, 2006, at 5:25 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> >I've heard nothing to provide a reason for not bringing in the
> >contribution
> >as a standalone podling, which ServiceMix and others can consume.
> >This would be in accor
On Feb 13, 2006, at 5:34 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 12:42:58PM -0800, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
...
Sybase wants to donate to the service-mix community and the
ServiceMix community wants to work with the code. Any contributor
It should be donate to APACHE. The various people c
On Feb 13, 2006, at 5:25 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I've heard nothing to provide a reason for not bringing in the
contribution
as a standalone podling, which ServiceMix and others can consume.
This
would be in accord with Ken and Mads.
I really detest it when people try to flip the burde
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 12:42:58PM -0800, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>...
> Sybase wants to donate to the service-mix community and the
> ServiceMix community wants to work with the code. Any contributor
It should be donate to APACHE. The various people can come to it.
To be frank, some communities
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> I think ServiceMix is the perfect home for a BPEL engine. Every
> JBI implementation that I am aware of has and integrated orchestration
> engine exposed via the BPEL specification.
If every JBI implementation has an integrated orchestration engine, then we
should factor
was there some crosspost dropped here?
Mads Toftum wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 02:19:56PM -0800, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
If any project inside or outside of Apache wants their own copy
of this code to develop they can always fork the code (as is allowed
by any open source project).
Wh
David Crossley wrote:
> Assuming the project has been accepted for Incubation,
> you need the project status report before any
> infrastructure stuff will happen.
Done. I added the projects/kabuki.xml file, re-generated
the site and updated the public web.
Who has the karma+knowledge to be able t
Hi David,
Allen is out this week. I'll take a look at it.
Thanks,
Michael
> -Original Message-
> From: David Crossley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 1:24 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: wrong source format for xm
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 02:19:56PM -0800, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>If any project inside or outside of Apache wants their own copy
> of this code to develop they can always fork the code (as is allowed
> by any open source project).
>
Whoa! Are you actively suggesting forks inside the same c
After a quick chat with Dims, I think I need to make a quick
correction to this email
On Feb 13, 2006, at 12:42 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I think ServiceMix is the perfect home for a BPEL engine. Every
JBI implementation that I am aware of has and integrated
orchestration engine expos
I am more than willing to rebuild the site, but the xmlbeancxx.xml
file is really messed up and I don't have the time to fix it right
now. It is missing most quotes around attribute values and has many
unclosed xml elements.
Can someone from this project clean up this file?
Thanks,
-dain
I agree with Dain; let's get the code running in ServiceMix, and then
we can break it off when it's ready to stand alone.
Thanks,
Aaron
On 2/13/06, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think ServiceMix is the perfect home for a BPEL engine. Every JBI
> implementation that I am aware
David Crossley wrote:
> Jean T. Anderson wrote:
>
>>Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>>
>>>Should be fixed now.
>>>
>>>How often does the site update?
>>
>>I notice it happens very quickly (a matter of a minute, if even that)
>>these days after you do the 'svn up' on people.apache.org.
>
>
> Dain, i notice
Would somebody from the project please fix the status report.
It seems that you have used a copy of an old generated
website document rather than the source template.
-David
David Crossley wrote:
> Please follow the instructions at
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html
>
> You have
Jean T. Anderson wrote:
> Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> > Should be fixed now.
> >
> > How often does the site update?
>
> I notice it happens very quickly (a matter of a minute, if even that)
> these days after you do the 'svn up' on people.apache.org.
Dain, i noticed that you only updated the source
I have committed the ip-clearance for the XBean donation to Geronimo:
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?rev=377477&view=rev
If there are no objections, I will commit the code with history on
Wednesday February 15th.
-dain
-
I think ServiceMix is the perfect home for a BPEL engine. Every JBI
implementation that I am aware of has and integrated orchestration
engine exposed via the BPEL specification. I am not worried about
"barriers" to any committers, "accidental too-tight binding" or
"UNrelated" mail on mai
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
After re-reading all the discussion threads and getting
some technology education from people kind enough not to
bash me on the bonce, my strong recommendation is that
the Sybase contribution be made as a new podling proposal
to the incubator.
That's
On 2/13/06, Jean T. Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I notice it happens very quickly (a matter of a minute, if even that)
> these days after you do the 'svn up' on people.apache.org.
people.apache.org == www.apache.org right now. ;-)
When ajax gets reinstalled, we may push www back over to
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On 2/13/06, Jean T. Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>This won't work because this file is in the same directory as the index
>>file. This entry needs to be:
>
>
> It worked when the base tag was there (i.e. when I cleaned up that
> page). When the base tag was
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> Should be fixed now.
>
> How often does the site update?
I notice it happens very quickly (a matter of a minute, if even that)
these days after you do the 'svn up' on people.apache.org.
-jean
> -dain
>
> On Feb 13, 2006, at 11:29 AM, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
>
>> Dava
On 2/13/06, Jean T. Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This won't work because this file is in the same directory as the index
> file. This entry needs to be:
It worked when the base tag was there (i.e. when I cleaned up that
page). When the base tag was removed, it obviously broke. =)
No bi
Should be fixed now.
How often does the site update?
-dain
On Feb 13, 2006, at 11:29 AM, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
hmmm..they have extra "ip-clearance" in each of the url's.
The additional directory is in the source. For example, here's the
first
entry in incubator
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> hmmm..they have extra "ip-clearance" in each of the url's.
The additional directory is in the source. For example, here's the first
entry in incubator/site-author/ip-clearance/index.xml:
harmony-16-contribution-classlib-intel
This won't work because this file is in the
hmmm..they have extra "ip-clearance" in each of the url's.
On 2/13/06, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The all of the links on http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/
> index.html seem to be broken. I'll try to figure out what is wrong,
> but if someone has an idea or is already wo
The all of the links on http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/
index.html seem to be broken. I'll try to figure out what is wrong,
but if someone has an idea or is already working on it, please let me
know.
-dain
-
To
On Feb 13, 2006, at 9:26 AM, J Aaron Farr wrote:
On 2/13/06, Jacopo Cappellato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
J Aaron,
thanks for your feedback.
Sorry but I still have some doubts about this:
if a guy signs an iCLA in which he states that he agrees to release
under the ASL all the work (present a
Noel - AFAIK all of your reservations are now resolved - can you
confirm you are happy to remove your -1 so we can do the milestone
release please?
James
On 10 Feb 2006, at 05:54, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
What's the current vote at? IIUC, if Noel remove's his -1 vote,
the release is good to
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-14?page=all ]
Jean T. Anderson closed INCUBATOR-14:
-
Resolution: Fixed
The doc topic thread started on general@ at
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200602.mbox/[EMAIL
P
On 2/13/06, Jacopo Cappellato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> J Aaron,
>
> thanks for your feedback.
> Sorry but I still have some doubts about this:
>
> if a guy signs an iCLA in which he states that he agrees to release
> under the ASL all the work (present and future) that he sends to the ASF
> (th
J Aaron,
thanks for your feedback.
Sorry but I still have some doubts about this:
if a guy signs an iCLA in which he states that he agrees to release
under the ASL all the work (present and future) that he sends to the ASF
(thru mailing lists, Jira, SVN etc...), in which way this agreement wil
On 2/13/06, Jacopo Cappellato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> here at OFBiz we'd like to go on with the IP-clearance effort but, since
> we are going to contact *many* developers, we would like to be sure that
> the steps we'll perform are the correct ones.
>
> Anyone here could help us to
44 matches
Mail list logo
