Russell McOrmand wrote:
>As a user I appreciate the heads-up of the developer
> conversations and the who-is-who of the administrative
> conversations. If the list were split into 3 I would try to
> subscribe to all 3.
As an avid lurker, I'd echo this sentiment. Much of the listserve traf
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
I have a few concerns with starting a gdal-users.
As a user I appreciate the heads-up of the developer conversations and
the who-is-who of the administrative conversations. If the list were
split into 3 I would try to subscribe to all 3.
I'v
Ari Jolma wrote:
Folks,
gdal-dev has grown to more than 10 mails per day. There are a lot of
mails about using gdal (often programming questions but still just using
gdal through one of the APIs). I propose to split this list into
gdal-dev (for mails that relate to development of and bugs in gda
Howard Butler wrote:
On Mar 3, 2010, at 12:40 AM, Ari Jolma wrote:
Folks,
gdal-dev has grown to more than 10 mails per day. There are a lot of
mails about using gdal (often programming questions but still just using
gdal through one of the APIs). I propose to split this list into
gdal-dev (
On Mar 3, 2010, at 12:40 AM, Ari Jolma wrote:
> Folks,
>
> gdal-dev has grown to more than 10 mails per day. There are a lot of
> mails about using gdal (often programming questions but still just using
> gdal through one of the APIs). I propose to split this list into
> gdal-dev (for mails that
Folks,
gdal-dev has grown to more than 10 mails per day. There are a lot of
mails about using gdal (often programming questions but still just using
gdal through one of the APIs). I propose to split this list into
gdal-dev (for mails that relate to development of and bugs in gdal) and
gdal-users.