Friends,
I sent this mail on Friday. Request for a remedy. If someone can send a
built-in project (needn't be with a high end code) using MFC in VC++ 2008
in a Win Zip or RAR, it will be even better.
The error (pl. see No. 8) I got is
f:\sw\GDALexperiment\GDALexperiment\header\cpl_port.h: fatal e
2013/10/6 Even Rouault
>
> My rationale was that we have already a few methods that take an approx
> flag
> (e.g. GetFeatureCount(), CreateField() ), but I don't feel very strongly
> for
> one way or the other one.
>
>
Even,
Yes it's not a significant question indeed. I like Jürgen's original
ve
2013/10/6 Jürgen E.
>
> int iDstField = bExactFieldNameMatch?
> poDstFDefn->GetFieldIndex(poSrcFieldDefn->GetNameRef()) :
> poDstLayer->FindFieldIndex(poSrcFieldDefn->GetNameRef());
>
>
Ah yes, this is what I wanted to say. No additional method would be
required.
Tamas
__
Le dimanche 06 octobre 2013 22:21:52, Tamas Szekeres a écrit :
> Hi Jürgen,
>
> The commit you're referring to, doesn't seem contain the handling of the
> bExactMatch parameter at the driver. At the moment I consider this a bit
> redundant if calling OGRLayer::FindFieldIndex with bExactMatch = TRU
Hi Tamas,
On Sun, 06. Oct 2013 at 22:21:52 +0200, Tamas Szekeres wrote:
> The commit you're referring to, doesn't seem contain the handling of theÂ
> bExactMatch parameter at the driver. At the moment I consider this a bit
> redundant if calling OGRLayer::FindFieldIndex with bExactMatch = TRUE doe
Hi Jürgen,
The commit you're referring to, doesn't seem contain the handling of the
bExactMatch parameter at the driver. At the moment I consider this a bit
redundant if calling OGRLayer::FindFieldIndex with bExactMatch = TRUE does
the same as OGRLayer::GetFieldIndex. In this regard I'd be in favo
Hi Tamas,
On Sun, 06. Oct 2013 at 20:05:18 +0200, Tamas Szekeres wrote:
>Looks like a good proposal.
>The only thing I'm uncertain about whether the driver should do something
>different when calling OGRLayer::FindFieldIndex with bExactMatch = TRUE
>than when calling OGRLayer::GetF
Jürgen,
Looks like a good proposal.
The only thing I'm uncertain about whether the driver should do something
different when calling OGRLayer::FindFieldIndex with bExactMatch = TRUE
than when calling OGRLayer::GetFieldIndex? I don't see the driver
implementation in the pull request which would pro
Hi,
This is a call for discussion for "RFC 42: OGR Layer laundered field lookup":
http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc42_find_laundered_fields
It proposes a new method in the OGR layer class (and a C API) to lookup indexes
of fields, whose names have been altered by drivers (eg. by LAUNDER in OC
