Le dimanche 06 octobre 2013 22:21:52, Tamas Szekeres a écrit : > Hi Jürgen, > > The commit you're referring to, doesn't seem contain the handling of the > bExactMatch parameter at the driver. At the moment I consider this a bit > redundant if calling OGRLayer::FindFieldIndex with bExactMatch = TRUE does > the same as OGRLayer::GetFieldIndex. In this regard I'd be in favour of > using the same signature for both functions. In ogr2ogr we could then do > something like: > > int iDstField = bExactFieldNameMatch? > poDstLayer->GetFieldIndex(poSrcFieldDefn->GetNameRef()) : > poDstLayer->FindFieldIndex(poSrcFieldDefn->GetNameRef());
Tamas, Actually, it was committed in https://github.com/jef- n/gdal/commit/a12311e56cf09d9deb15a18e93704377d1627c12 following a suggestion from mine in the discussion of the pull request. My rationale was that we have already a few methods that take an approx flag (e.g. GetFeatureCount(), CreateField() ), but I don't feel very strongly for one way or the other one. Even -- Geospatial professional services http://even.rouault.free.fr/services.html _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
