Hello,
As time progresses, the ada-hurd.diff patch has now been living in Debian since
gcc-4.6 and is now in gcc-5 and gcc-6. Last try to get it included upstream was
in 2012, and 2014, e.g see
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-06/msg0.html
and follow-ups.
Maybe the time has come now fo
Hi,
Attached are patches to enable gccgo to build properly on Debian
GNU/Hurd on gcc-8 (8-8-20171108-1).
The first two patches are Debian-specific:
Enable build of gccgo for GNU/Hurd:
* debian_rules.defs.diff
Define patches for the generated series file:
* debian_rules.patch.diff
The third enabl
* src_libgo_build.diff: configure.ac, Makefile.* and shell script patches.
* src_libgo_go_crypto.diff: Certificate go files.
* src_libgo_go_net.diff: OS-specific net go files.
* src_libgo_go_os.diff: OS-specific os go files.
* src_libgo_go_runtime.diff: OS-specific runtime go files.
* src_libgo_go_
* add-gnu-to-libgo-headers.diff: Add gnu to libgo headers for build.
* add-gnu-to-libgo-test-headers.diff: Add gnu to libgo headers for tests.
* src_libgo_go_go_build_syslist.go.diff: Add gnu to the goosList.
* src_libgo_go_syscall_syscall_gnu_test.go.diff: gnu-specific file for tests
involving str
On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 21:40 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 06.11.2017 16:36, Svante Signell wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Attached are patches to enable gccgo to build properly on Debian
> > GNU/Hurd on gcc-7 (7-7.2.0-12).
>
> sysinfo.go:6744:7: error: redefinition
On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 21:54 +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 21:40 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > On 06.11.2017 16:36, Svante Signell wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Attached are patches to enable gccgo to build properly on Debian
On Thu, 2017-11-16 at 14:12 +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 21:54 +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> >
>
> Attached is an updated patch for gcc-7. An updated patch for gcc-8 will follow
> shortly when I have build tested gcc-8 go on both Linux and Hurd.
>
On Thu, 2017-11-16 at 20:39 +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
Seeing the recent update of debian/rules.defs in gcc-7 a mistake was revealed in
the patch debian_rules.defs for both gcc-7 and gcc-8. The correct patch is
inlined below:
--- a/debian/rules.defs 2017-11-20 12:59:25.0 +0100
+++ b
On Mon, 2017-11-20 at 14:04 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2017-11-20 13:20, Svante Signell wrote:
> > On Thu, 2017-11-16 at 20:39 +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> >
> > Seeing the recent update of debian/rules.defs in gcc-7 a mistake was
> > revealed in the patch deb
Hi,
Attached is the updated patch, src_libgo_build.diff, to build gccgo properly on
Debian GNU/Hurd on gcc-7 (7-7.3.0-{8,9,10}) again after the update of glibc to
2.26+
The libgo tests show the following:
=== libgo Summary ===
# of expected passes119
# of unexpected
On Mon, 2018-03-12 at 13:29 +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> The patches really changed are only four:
> src_libgo_runtime.diff
> src_libgo_go_go_build_syslist.go.diff
> src_libgo_go_runtime.diff
> src_libgo_build.diff
Correction: five:
add-gnu-to-libgo-headers.diff
On Mon, 2018-03-12 at 14:44 +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-03-12 at 13:29 +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
>
>
> > The patches really changed are only four:
> > src_libgo_runtime.diff
> > src_libgo_go_go_build_syslist.go.diff
> > src_libgo_go_runt
On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 10:48 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Wed 21 May 2014 10:44:54 +0200, a écrit :
> > On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 10:33 +0200, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
> > > > > I think the majority of work has bee done, Now that patch will change
> > &g
On Mon, 2018-10-22 at 11:15 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As advised by the Debian gcc maintainer Matthias Klose and golang
> developer Ian Lance Taylor (Cc:ed) I'm (re-)submitting the patches
> for the port of gccgo to GNU/Hurd.
>
> The 13 patches are:
ping, no feedback so far, is anything missing/are the patches rejected?
On Sat, 2018-10-27 at 20:43 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As advised by the Debian gcc maintainer Matthias Klose and golang
> developer Ian Lance Taylor I'm (re-)submitting the patches for
>
Lance Taylor and Matthis
Klose.
Thanks!
gcc/config/ChangeLog
2018-10-10 Svante Signell
* gcc/config/i386/gnu.h: Enable split-stack support
Index: gcc-snapshot-20181019-1.1/src/gcc/config/i386/gnu.h
===
--- gcc-snapshot-20181019
On Sat, 2019-02-09 at 14:40 -0800, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 3:07 PM Matthias Klose wrote:
> > On 07.02.19 06:04, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> What are the lines before that in the log? For some reason libtool is
> being invoke with no source files. The lines before the fail
On Sat, 2019-02-09 at 23:57 +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Sat, 2019-02-09 at 14:40 -0800, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 3:07 PM Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > On 07.02.19 06:04, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> > What are the lines before that in the log?
On Sun, 2019-02-10 at 22:08 -0800, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 3:41 AM Svante Signell
> wrote:
> > On Sat, 2019-02-09 at 23:57 +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2019-02-09 at 14:40 -0800, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Feb
On Mon, 2019-02-11 at 10:27 -0800, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 3:10 AM Svante Signell
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2019-02-10 at 22:08 -0800, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> > > On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 3:41 AM Svante Signell
> > > wrote:
> > > >
Hi,
Attached are patches to enable gccgo to build properly on Debian
GNU/Hurd on gcc-7 (7-7.2.0-12).
The first two patches are Debian-specific:
Enable build of gccgo for GNU/Hurd:
* debian_rules.defs.diff
Define patches for the generated series file:
* debian_rules.patch.diff
The third enables s
* src_libgo_build.diff: configure.ac, Makefile.* and shell script patches.
* src_libgo_go_crypto.diff: Certificate go files.
* src_libgo_go_net.diff: OS-specific net go files.
* src_libgo_go_os.diff: OS-specific os go files.
* src_libgo_go_runtime.diff: OS-specific runtime go files.
* src_libgo_go_
* add-gnu-to-libgo-headers.diff: Add gnu to libgo headers for build.
* add-gnu-to-libgo-test-headers.diff: Add gnu to libgo headers for tests.
* src_libgo_go_go_build_syslist.go.diff: Add gnu to the goosList.
* src_libgo_go_syscall_syscall_gnu_test.go.diff: gnu-specific file for tests
involving str
es, patches need ChangeLog. This one is small though so I have applied it:
>
> 2016-03-16 Svante Signell
>
> * gcc-interface/Makefile.in: Add support for x86 GNU/Hurd.
> * s-osinte-gnu.ads: New file.
Hi Eric,
Sorry for not supplying a ChangeLog yet, I've been
is only s-osinte-gnu.ads in the posted patch.
Yes, you are right, somehow I submitted the old patch. Attached is the updated
one, with a proposed ChangeLog entry included.
Thanks!2016-03-16 Svante Signell
* gcc-interface/Makefile.in: Add support for x86 GNU/Hurd.
* s-osinte
Sorry for manually creating this mail. Replying to Arnauds message crashes my
mail client (evolution).
On Wed, 2016-03-16 at 11:53 +0100, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
> Yes, you are right, somehow I submitted the old patch. Attached is the
> updated one, with a proposed ChangeLog entry included.
>
> The
d be
> copyright FSF, not AdaCore.
Attached is an updated ada-hurd.diff with your comments above taken care of.
OK now?
Thanks!2016-03-31 Svante Signell
* gcc-interface/Makefile.in: Add support for x86 GNU/Hurd.
* s-osinte-gnu.ads: New specification file.
* s-osinte-gnu.ad
ping!
The updated attachment was included in message
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-03/msg01659.html
On Thu, 2016-03-31 at 11:33 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-03-17 at 08:51 +0100, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > >
On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 10:29 +0200, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
> >
> > The updated attachment was included in message
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-03/msg01659.html
> You should just put a FSF copyright on s-osinte-gnu.adb
>
> OK with this change.
Is replacing
+-- Copyright
ew file, yes that's fine.
Attaching the modified ada-hurd.diff. Maybe it is ready for inclusion in
upstream now?
2016-03-31 Svante Signell
* gcc-interface/Makefile.in: Add support for x86 GNU/Hurd.
* s-osinte-gnu.ads: New specification file.
* s-osinte-gnu.adb
nd 6 branch (not sure it will be in the 6.1 release).
>
>
> 2016-04-27 Svante Signell
>
> * gcc-interface/Makefile.in (x86 GNU/Hurd): Use s-osinte-gnu.adb.
> * s-osinte-gnu.ads: Small tweaks.
> * s-osinte-gnu.adb: New file.
I did not know that, when did
* src_libgo_configure.ac.diff: Define GOOS=gnu and LIBGO_IS_GNU
* src_libgo_Makefile.am.diff: Add support for GNU/Hurd.
* src_libgo_Makefile.in.diff: Update accordingly with autreconf2.64
* src_libgo_mksysinfo.sh.diff: Define SYS_IOCTL to 0 if not defined,
Fix: #define EWOULDBLOCK EAGAIN in
Fix:
Hi,
Attached are patches to enable gccgo to build properly on Debian
GNU/Hurd on gcc-6 (6-6.2.1-5).
The first three patches are Debian-specific:
* debian_rules.defs.diff: Enables build of gccgo for GNU/Hurd
Define patches for the generated series file:
* debian_rules.patch.diff: Enables split-
* src_libgo_go_net_sendfile_gnu.go.diff: New file
* src_libgo_go_net_sock_gnu.go.diff: New file
* src_libgo_go_net_sockopt_gnu.go.diff: New file
* src_libgo_go_net_sockoptip_gnu.go.diff: New file
* src_libgo_go_syscall_libcall_gnu_386.go.diff: New file
* src_libgo_go_syscall_libcall_gnu.go.diff: Ne
* src_libgo_runtime_netpoll.goc.diff: Fix restricted word bug.
Rename variable errno to errno1.
* src_libgo_go_os_os_test.go.diff: Allow EFBIG return code to big
seeks.
* src_libgo_go_syscall_syscall_gnu_test.go: New file:
Define Type and Whence as 32bit in syscall.Flock_t
* src_libgo_testsuite
On Sun, 2016-11-27 at 18:02 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hello,
...
> > But as you wish, an updated patch is attached.
>
> _Bool
> Continued (uint32_t *w)
> {
> +#ifndef WCONTINUED
> + *w = 0;
> + return 0;
> +#else
> return WIFCONTINUED (*w) != 0;
> +#endif
> }
>
> Err, recheck the s
On Sun, 2016-11-27 at 18:02 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Svante Signell, on Sun 27 Nov 2016 17:33:52 +0100, wrote:
> > > >
> > > And
> > > src_libgo_go_syscall_syscall_gnu_test.go: New file:
> > > Define Type and Whence as 32b
On Wed, 2016-12-07 at 15:08 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, on Wed 07 Dec 2016 14:52:35 +0100, wrote:
> > Since go does not have a preprocessor allowing conditional code paths this
> > is
> > how it should be done (and as I did):
> > http://blo
On Wed, 2016-12-07 at 17:25 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, on Wed 07 Dec 2016 15:32:31 +0100, wrote:
> > On Wed, 2016-12-07 at 15:08 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > Ok, but then I'd say move the function which change to a separate file,
> > >
On Wed, 2016-05-04 at 17:34 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Samuel Thibault, on Wed 04 May 2016 17:29:48 +0200, wrote:
> > The gcc-6 build failed. I see that one of the change is:
> >
> > - -- From: /usr/include/unistd.h __getpagesize or getpagesize??
> > - function Get_Page_Size return int;
On Wed, 2016-05-04 at 18:43 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> OnSamuel Thibault, on Wed 04 May 2016 17:29:48 +0200, wrote:
> >
> > > - -- From: /usr/include/unistd.h __getpagesize or
> > > getpagesize??
> > > - function Get_Page_Size return int;
> >
On Wed, 2016-05-04 at 23:06 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, on Wed 04 May 2016 19:43:27 +0200, wrote:
> > May I comment on Debian way of apt-get source gcc-*: Doing that
> > does
> > not unpack the sources, neither does it apply the patches, you have
> &
Hello,
Attached is a patch for support of GNU/Hurd in gnat-4.9. This patch has
been used and updated in Debian since gnat-4.6, and is currently used to
build gnat-4.9. Now when the body file s-osinte-posix.adb in gcc-4.9
defines tv_nsec in timespec POSIX-correctly as long again, we think it
is tim
±On Sat, 2014-04-26 at 08:53 +0200, Justus Winter wrote:
> Quoting Svante Signell (2014-04-24 10:39:10)
> > On Fri, 2014-04-18 at 10:03 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > Samuel Thibault, le Thu 17 Apr 2014 00:03:45 +0200, a écrit :
> > > > Thomas Schwinge, le Wed
On Fri, 2014-05-02 at 00:45 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Svante Signell, le Thu 24 Apr 2014 10:39:10 +0200, a écrit :
> > - Without split stack enabled around 70 libgo tests pass and 50 fails,
> > most of them with a segfault.
> > - Enabling split stac
On Fri, 2014-05-02 at 12:00 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Samuel Thibault, le Fri 02 May 2014 11:57:53 +0200, a écrit :
> > So we just need to fix guardsize in our libpthread.
>
> (And I'll have a look at it).
Maybe this can fix the around 40 segfaults (of 50 failures) when split
stack is disab
On Fri, 2014-05-02 at 12:52 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Fri 02 May 2014 12:45:56 +0200, a écrit :
> > On Fri, 2014-05-02 at 12:00 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > Samuel Thibault, le Fri 02 May 2014 11:57:53 +0200, a écrit :
> > > > So we jus
Hi,
Attached are patches to enable gccgo to build properly on Debian
GNU/Hurd on gcc-4.9 (4.9-4.9.0-1). With split stack enabled 95 libgo
tests PASS and 27 FAIL. Many of the failed tests do fail only in a few
sub-tests. patch0.diff is debian specific, while the rest are for
upstream.
patch0.diff
(continued)
patch4.diff: src/libgo/go/syscall/libcall_posix-1.go: New file, a copy
of libcall_posix.go with the mount, mlockall and munlockall calls
removed. mount/umount functionality exists but is currently part of
Hurd utilities, the outhe two functions are not yet implemented.
patch5.diff: s
(continued)
patch7.diff: src/libgo/go/syscall/wait.c
Set WCONTINUED to zero if not defined (same fix as for lto in gcc-4.9)
patch8.diff: src/libgo/mksysinfo.sh
Add special treatment of EWOULDBLOCK, SYS_FCNTL and st_dev since they
are either not defined or defined differently for the script to ca
On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 11:07 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Tue 06 May 2014 10:58:38 +0200, a écrit :
> > The patch for st_dev by Thomas Schwinge was not liked by Samuel
>
> Uh?
>
> I said “These should be fine, however.” and “a sed rule can't
On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 14:51 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Just to explicitly ask for it:
>
> Svante Signell, le Tue 06 May 2014 10:06:49 +0200, a écrit :
> > For some (yet) unknown reason all libgo tests fails with a segfault when
> > run in the build tree: make, sh or som
On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 15:07 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Tue 06 May 2014 15:05:20 +0200, a écrit :
> > On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 14:51 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > Just to explicitly ask for it:
> > >
> > > Svante Signell, le Tue
On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 15:26 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Tue 06 May 2014 15:25:38 +0200, a écrit :
> > On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 15:07 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > Svante Signell, le Tue 06 May 2014 15:05:20 +0200, a écrit :
> > > > On
On Wed, 2014-05-07 at 10:18 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 15:26 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Attached is an updated patch8.diff. Arch specific code to
src/libgo/mksysinfo.sh has been added, now other systems are not
affected by the patch except the SYS_FCNTL part.
On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 06:20 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 1:03 AM, Svante Signell
> wrote:
> >
> > For that part of the patch without it the build on GNU/Hurd fails. On
> > the other hand SYS_FCNTL is not defined for e.g. GNU/Linux either. Thi
On Wed, 2014-05-14 at 12:53 +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > Attached is a patch for support of GNU/Hurd in gnat-4.9. This patch has
> > been used and updated in Debian since gnat-4.6, and is currently used to
> > build gnat-4.9. Now when the body file s-osinte-posix.adb in gcc-4.9
> > defines tv_ns
On Mon, 2014-05-19 at 14:50 +0200, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
> > The build went fine. Is something still missing?
>
> We never keep commented out code, except with a ??? comment explaining why.
Do you want me to remove all GNU/Hurd specific header file info?
> We don't use 'FIXME', we use ??? instea
On Mon, 2014-05-19 at 15:53 +0200, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
> > Do you want me to remove all GNU/Hurd specific header file info?
>
> No, I want you to remove commented out code, such as:
>
> > +-- SIGLTHRRES : constant := 32; -- GNU/LinuxThreads restart signal
> > +-- SIGLTHRCAN : constant := 3
On Mon, 2014-05-19 at 16:25 +0200, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
> > > That's actually the biggest concern when people submit a new port: they
> > > submit it, get it approved, commit it and then are no longer available
> > > for any maintenance when these files need to be updated/become outdated/
> > > no
On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 10:03 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Wed 21 May 2014 09:49:59 +0200, a écrit :
> > Thomas and Samuel: It looks like upstream don't accept patches unless a
> > Hurd port maintainer commits to it. What's the use of all this job?
>
On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 10:29 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Wed 21 May 2014 10:20:16 +0200, a écrit :
> > On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 10:03 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > Svante Signell, le Wed 21 May 2014 09:49:59 +0200, a écrit :
> > > > Th
On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 10:33 +0200, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
> > > I think the majority of work has bee done, Now that patch will change
> > > slightly for every missing feature added to Hurd.
> >
> > Then it's all good, it's a matter of what I said above.
>
> Don't forget also the part where general
On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 10:47 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Wed 21 May 2014 10:40:37 +0200, a écrit :
> > > > What kind of person do you have to be to be accepted, a GNU/Hurd
> > > > developer or a GNU/Ada developer having a gnu.org account?
> &g
On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 11:27 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Wed 21 May 2014 11:22:44 +0200, a écrit :
> > On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 10:47 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > Svante Signell, le Wed 21 May 2014 10:40:37 +0200, a écrit :
> > > > > >
In reply to the thread ending with:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg02069.html
and bugs:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54040
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59346
Changing s-osinte-posix.adb
- tv_nsec => long (Long_Long_Integer (F * 10#1#E9)));
+ tv_nsec
Hi,
Should I file a bug to get feedback on this issue? I know Ada is not the
most prioritized language for gcc, but anyway. The current
implementation is not POSIX-compliant.
On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 14:37 +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> In reply to the thread ending with:
> http://gcc.gnu.
On Wed, 2014-03-26 at 00:25 +0100, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > Should I file a bug to get feedback on this issue? I know Ada is not the
> > most prioritized language for gcc, but anyway. The current
> > implementation is not POSIX-compliant.
>
> Can you post a complete patch doing the reversion? Bre
On Wed, 2014-03-26 at 00:25 +0100, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > Should I file a bug to get feedback on this issue? I know Ada is not the
> > most prioritized language for gcc, but anyway. The current
> > implementation is not POSIX-compliant.
>
> Can you post a complete patch doing the reversion? Bre
On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 09:26 +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > Attached is a patch reverting the two commits for PR ada/54040:
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git&a=search&h=HEAD&st=commit&s=PR+ada%
> > 2F54040
>
> I don't think that's sufficient though, IIRC there were followup changes, so
> you'
On Fri, 2014-04-04 at 21:14 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thomas Schwinge, le Wed 26 Jun 2013 23:30:03 +0200, a écrit :
> > On Sat, 22 Jun 2013 08:15:46 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor
> > wrote:
> > > Go can work without split stack. In that case libgo will use much
> > > larger stacks fo
On Wed, 2014-04-09 at 14:41 +0200, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
> > What do you think, Arno? I think that the POSIX breakage (and its fallout
> > for
> > the other Unices) is ugly and worth the additional complication.
>
> Yes, your patch looks good to me.
Would it be possible to have s-osinte-posix.a
On Wed, 2014-04-09 at 16:24 +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > Would it be possible to have s-osinte-posix.adb also for x32 and in
> > s-osinte-x32.ads use the following construct:
> > ...
> >type timespec is private;
> > ...
> >type timespec is record
> > tv_sec : time_t;
> > tv_
Hi,
Attached are patches to enable gccgo to build properly on Debian
GNU/Hurd on gcc-4.9 (4.9-20140406). With split stack disabled around 70
libgo tests PASS and 50 FAIL (result seems to be somewhat random,
alignment problems there too?). With split stack enabled _all_ tests
fail, see
https://list
--- Begin Message ---
(continued)
patch4.diff: src/libgo/go/syscall/libcall_posix-1.go:
New file, a copy of libcall_posix.go with the mount call removed.
mount/umount functionality exists but is currently part of Hurd
utilities.
patch5.diff: src/libgo/go/net/sock_gnu.go
Create a dummy function f
--- Begin Message ---
(continued)
patch7.diff: src/libgo/go/syscall/wait.c
Set WCONTINUED to zero if not defined (same fix as for lto in gcc-4.9)
patch8.diff: src/libgo/mksysinfo.sh
Add special treatment of EWOULDBLOCK, SYS_FCNTL and st_dev since they
are either not defined or defined differentl
On Fri, 2014-04-11 at 07:48 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 5:47 AM, Svante Signell
> wrote:
> >
> > Attached are patches to enable gccgo to build properly on Debian
> > GNU/Hurd on gcc-4.9 (4.9-20140406).
>
> Thanks. Will review a
On Sat, 2014-04-12 at 16:04 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-04-11 at 07:48 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 5:47 AM, Svante Signell
> > wrote:
> >
> > I don't understand this comment. The GCC libraries do still use
> &g
On Fri, 2014-04-11 at 22:52 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Fri 11 Apr 2014 14:47:21 +0200, a écrit :
> > #ifdef TARGET_LIBC_PROVIDES_SSP
> > +/* i386 glibc provides __stack_chk_guard in %gs:0x14. */
> > +#define TARGET_THREAD_SSP_OFFSET 0x14
>
>
On Fri, 2014-04-11 at 22:55 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Fri 11 Apr 2014 14:57:35 +0200, a écrit :
> > --- a/src/libgo/mksysinfo.sh
> > +++ b/src/libgo/mksysinfo.sh
>
> Err, these seem to get applied to all systems, not just GNU/Hurd, isn't
> tha
On Mon, 2014-04-14 at 11:03 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Mon 14 Apr 2014 09:59:03 +0200, a écrit :
> > > > @@ -528,6 +538,8 @@
> > > >
> > > > # The stat type.
> > > > # Prefer largefile variant if available.
On Fri, 2014-04-18 at 10:03 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Samuel Thibault, le Thu 17 Apr 2014 00:03:45 +0200, a écrit :
> > Thomas Schwinge, le Wed 09 Apr 2014 09:36:42 +0200, a écrit :
> > > Well, the first step is to verify that TARGET_THREAD_SPLIT_STACK_OFFSET
> > > and similar configury is co
On Mon, 2012-06-18 at 12:23 +0200, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
> > Here is a patch that adds a basic GCC Ada/GNAT configuration for x86
> > GNU/Hurd. This has originally been created by Svante Signell for use
> > with Debian's GCC 4.6 package, and now I have ported it to trun
Package: gcc-snapshot
Version: 1:20230315-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: hurd
Affects: gcc-snapshot
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-h...@lists.debian.org
Hello, seems like the patch gcc_config_gnu.h.diff, in debian gcc-12 named:
pr104290-followup.diff was lost
Hello,
Latest Debian snapshot of gcc (20200917-1) FTBFS due to a missing hurd
entry in the // +build line of libgo/go/net/fd_posix.go. Attached is a
patch for that missing entry.
With it the latest Debian snapshot has been successfully built. Test
results for libgo and go are:
==
Source: gcc-12
Version: 12_12.2.0-5
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: hurd
Affects: gcc-11, gcc-snapshot
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-h...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
gcc-12-12.2.0-4/5 in sid FTBFS on hurd-i386 due to failing linkage of
pthread_once (same error for gcc
ping
On Wed, 2022-02-23 at 11:13 +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In line of porting the latest build of libgo/go with gcc-12 to GNU/Hurd,
> support
> of split-stack was found to be removed.
>
> After patching the files in libgo the build of gotools fails:
> go
Hello,
In line of porting the latest build of libgo/go with gcc-12 to GNU/Hurd, support
of split-stack was found to be removed.
After patching the files in libgo the build of gotools fails:
go1: error: '-fsplit-stack' currently only supported on GNU/Linux
go1: error: '-fsplit-stack' is not suppo
Source: gcc-11
Version: 11.3.0-10
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: hurd
Affects: gcc-11, gcc-snapshot
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-h...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
gcc-11-11.3.0-10 in sid FTBFS on hurd-i386 due to failing linkage of
pthread_once (same error already fi
Source: gcc-snapshot
Version: 20230108-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: hurd
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-h...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
gcc-snapshot in sid FTBFS on hurd-i386 due to that some patches are not
applied when building gcc-snapshot. After the statement
90 matches
Mail list logo
