On Mon, 2014-05-19 at 16:25 +0200, Arnaud Charlet wrote: > > > That's actually the biggest concern when people submit a new port: they > > > submit it, get it approved, commit it and then are no longer available > > > for any maintenance when these files need to be updated/become outdated/ > > > no longer compile or run. > > > > I can try to do that in the near future, then somebody else can take > > over. I think maybe Thomas have an opinion about this being a Hurd > > developer and a GNU person at the same time. > > > > Updated patch attached, OK now? > > No, there are still code commented out, and we need to resolve the above > point first.
Thomas and Samuel: It looks like upstream don't accept patches unless a Hurd port maintainer commits to it. What's the use of all this job? (Of course it can at least run on Debian systems if/when accepted.)
