On Wed, 2014-04-09 at 14:41 +0200, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
> > What do you think, Arno? I think that the POSIX breakage (and its fallout
> > for
> > the other Unices) is ugly and worth the additional complication.
>
> Yes, your patch looks good to me.
Would it be possible to have s-osinte-posix.adb also for x32 and in
s-osinte-x32.ads use the following construct:
...
type timespec is private;
...
type timespec is record
tv_sec : time_t;
tv_nsec : long log;
end record;
pragma Convention (C, timespec);
and similiar for timeval if needed?
That's the construct other unices use now when s-osinte-posix.adb
defines tv_nsec as time_t?
