Hello Uroš
On 18 Aug 21:05, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> BTW: Taking these new findings into account, is it possible to split
> V_AVX512VL mode iterator in the same way to avoid compound conditions
> in the mode iterator?
I've refactored this iterator and fixed trunk. I've also updated all
future changes w
Hello Uroš,
On 15 Aug 20:29, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> Can you avoid insn constraints like:
>
> > + "TARGET_AVX512DQ && ( == 64 || TARGET_AVX512VL)"
>
> This should be split to two insn patterns, each with different
> baseline insn constraint.
I've splitted pattern into two similar w/ different mode
Hello,
On 15 Aug 20:35, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Kirill Yukhin
> wrote:
> Again, please split insn pattern to avoid:
>
> + "TARGET_SSE2
> + &&
> + && ((mode != V16HImode && mode != V8HImode)
> + || T
Hello,
This patch extends shift patterns with per-element
shift value. It was adopted by approach suggested
in previous patches.
Bootstrapped.
New tests on top of patch-set all pass
under simulator.
Is it ok for trunk?
gcc/
* config/i386/sse.md
(define_mode_iterator VI48_AVX2_48_
Hello,
This patch extends unaligned loads and stores patterns.
I've refactored original patch (stored on SVN's branch)
toward reducing complexity of conditions in
define_insn "_storedqu_mask"
It seems like such a trick won't work for:
_loaddqu
Problem is V[32|16]QI modes, which enabled for
Hello Uroš,
On 23 Aug 09:44, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Kirill Yukhin
> wrote:
>
> > This patch extends unaligned loads and stores patterns.
> At this stage, I'd still prefer simple constraints (the solution,
> proposed above), even f
Hello Uroš,
On 20 Aug 15:16, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> OK with this change.
I've discovered a problem with assembler operand of
vshuf*64x2 insn.
Patch below bootstrapped and avx512-regtested.
Is it ok for trunk?
gcc/
* config/i386/sse.md (define_mode_attr concat_tg_mode):
Move up.
Hello,
This patch introduces support for vcvtps2[u]qq.
Bootstrapped.
AVX-512* tests on top of patch-set all pass
under simulator.
Is it ok for trunk?
gcc/
* config/i386/sse.md
(define_mode_iterator VI8_256_512): New.
(define_insn
"avx512dq_cvtps2qq"):
Ditto.
Hello,
This patch introduces integer max/min AVX-512 pattern.
Bootstrapped.
AVX-512* tests on top of patch-set all pass
under simulator.
Is it ok for trunk?
gcc/
* config/i386/sse.md
(define_mode_iterator VI128_256): New.
(define_insn "3"): Ditto.
--
Thanks, K
diff --gi
Hello,
Proposed patch adds patterns for vps[rl]ldq insns
Bootstrapped.
AVX-512* tests on top of patch-set all pass
under simulator.
Is it ok for trunk?
gcc/
* config/i386/sse.md
(define_mode_iterator VIMAX_AVX2): Add V4TI mode.
(define_insn "_ashl3"): Add EVEX version.
Hello,
Patch in the bottom extends interleaves toward support
of AVX-512.
Bootstrapped.
AVX-512* tests on top of patch-set all pass
under simulator.
Is it ok for trunk?
gcc/
* config/i386/sse.md
(define_insn "avx512bw_interleave_highv64qi"): New.
(define_insn "avx2_interl
Hello,
Patch extends `plusminus' and `avg' insn patterns
toward AVX-512BW,VL support.
Bootstrapped.
AVX-512* tests on top of patch-set all pass
under simulator.
Is it ok for trunk?
gcc/
(define_mode_iterator VI12_AVX2): Add V64QI and V32HI modes.
(define_expand "_3"): Add
Hello,
This patch adds support for SI/DO masked interleaves.
Bootstrapped.
AVX-512* tests on top of patch-set all pass
under simulator.
Is it ok for trunk?
gcc/
* config/i386/sse.md
(define_insn "avx2_interleave_highv4di"): Add masking.
(define_insn "vec_interleave_highv2
Hello,
This patch introduces AVX-512 narrowing moves.
Bootstrapped.
AVX-512* tests on top of patch-set all pass
under simulator.
Is it ok for trunk?
gcc/
* config/i386/i386-modes.def: Add V12QI, V14QI, V6HI modes.
* config/i386/sse.md
(define_mode_iterator VI4_128_8_256):
Hello,
This patch adds patterns to support FMA new insns.
Bootstrapped.
AVX-512* tests on top of patch-set all pass
under simulator.
Is it ok for trunk?
gcc/
* config/i386/sse.md
(define_mode_iterator VF_AVX512VL): New.
(define_mode_iterator FMAMODEM): Allow 128/256bit ev
Hello Uroš,
On 28 Aug 20:34, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Kirill Yukhin
> wrote:
> > Is it ok for trunk?
> There is one inconsistency - existing pattern is named ..._mask_store,
> new ones are named ..._store_mask. Is there a reason for this
> diffe
Hello Uroš,
On 28 Aug 20:44, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Kirill Yukhin
> wrote:
> > Is it ok for trunk?
> I'd suggest to put noavx512 at the beginning, so:
>
> "noavx512_fma_fmsub_"
This is not possible currently since subst attrib
Hello,
Patch in the bottom updates few UNSPEC insn patterns w/ new
mode iterator. Additionally names were slightly changed.
Bootstrapped.
AVX-512* tests on top of patch-set all pass
under simulator.
Is it ok for trunk?
gcc/
* config/i386/i386.c
(avx512f_getmantv2df_round): Rename
Hello,
Patch in the bottom adds support for reduce,range,fpclass.
Bootstrapped.
AVX-512* tests on top of patch-set all pass
under simulator.
Is it ok for trunk?
gcc/
* config/i386/i386.c
(ix86_expand_args_builtin): Handle avx512dq_rangepv8df_mask_round,
avx512dq_rangepv16
Hello,
Patch in the bottom extends support of compress and expand
insns.
Bootstrapped.
AVX-512* tests on top of patch-set all pass
under simulator.
Is it ok for trunk?
gcc/
* config/i386/sse.md
(define_mode_iterator VI48F): New.
(define_insn "avx512f_compress_mask"): Dele
Hello,
This small patch introduces `sd' subst.
`sd' (Source-Destination) subst is almost the same, as
the usual mask-subst, but it's only used for zero-masking. The reason is that
some patterns already have an operand with constraint "0" and we can't add a new
operand with the same constraint. So,
Hello,
This patch introduces `sae-only' (EVEX feature to Supress
Arithmetic Exceptions) subst.
Bootstrapped.
Is it ok for trunk?
--
Thanks, K
---
gcc/config/i386/sse.md | 198 +++
gcc/config/i386/subst.md | 31
2 files changed, 130 insert
Hello,
This patch introduces dedicated subst to add rounding to
structureless expands.
Bootstrapped.
Is it ok for trunk?
--
Thanks, K
---
gcc/config/i386/sse.md | 24
gcc/config/i386/subst.md | 18 ++
2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
Hello,
This patch introduces sae-only feature for
structureless expands.
Bootstrapped.
Is it ok for trunk?
--
Thanks, K
---
gcc/config/i386/sse.md | 18 ++
gcc/config/i386/subst.md | 20
2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/
Hello,
I've looked into RTL after register allocation. Insn which
lead to assert is:
(insn 77 180 79 4 (set (reg/v:TF 44 loc12 [orig:359 T8 ] [359])
(mem:TF (post_modify:DI (reg/f:DI 14 r14 [435])
(plus:DI (reg/f:DI 14 r14 [435])
(reg:DI 45 loc13 [orig:34
Hello,
On 05 Nov 16:05, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> Is it ok with that change?
Ping?
--
Thanks, K
Hello,
On 07 Nov 15:42, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> Could you pls take a look?
Ping?
--
Thanks, K
Anna Tikhonova
Ilya Tocar
Andrey Turetskiy
Ilya Verbin
Kirill Yukhin
Michael Zolotukhin
* config/i386/i386.c (MAX_CLASSES): Increase number of classes.
(classify_argument): Extend for 512 bit vectors
Hello,
> Is it ok to commit to main trunk?
I've moved to this patch few hunks from
[4/8] [1/n], which related to scalar insns.
Updated patch in the bottom.
Testing pass.
Could you pls comment on it?
I cannot imagine anything except double nested vec_merges.
We may introduce (non-substed) dedica
Hello,
> I suspect that the problem reported by Jeff is related to the usage of "dead"
> in the REG subcase of the MEM case of ia64_split_tmode. There is a dangling
> comment to that effect in ia64_split_tmode_move just above the block.
We're failing here. Trying to split SET with these operand
Hello,
On 15 Nov 12:34, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > (insn 199 0 0 (set (reg:DI 14 r14)
> > (mem:DI (post_inc:DI (reg/f:DI 15 r15 [447])) [3
> > *_61[_12]{lb: 1 sz: 64}.text+0 S8 A128])) -1 (nil))
> > (insn 200 199 0 (set (reg:DI 15 r15)
> > (mem:DI (post_dec:DI (reg/f
On 15 Nov 16:55, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> Bootstrap (with Ada) is still in progress.
Passed for me (seems here is no Jeff's patch)
Hello,
On 15 Nov 17:11, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> On 15 Nov 16:55, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> > Bootstrap (with Ada) is still in progress.
>
> Passed for me (seems here is no Jeff's patch)
On recent trunk with patch applied, I've got:
/export/users/kyukhin/gcc/git/gcc/gcc/ada
Helllo,
On 13 Nov 16:18, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> Testing pass.
Ping?
--
Thanks, K
Hello,
On 06 Nov 10:15, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> Bootstrap pass.
>
> Is it ok for trunk?
Ping.
--
Thanks, K
Hello,
On 06 Nov 10:18, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> Corrsponding subst implementation is in the bottom.
>
> Bootstrapped.
>
> Is it ok for trunk?
Ping.
--
Thanks, K
Hello,
On 06 Nov 10:21, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> Bootstrapped.
>
> Is it ok for trunk?
Ping.
--
Thanks, K
Hello,
On 06 Nov 10:24, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> Bootstrapped.
>
> Is it ok for trunk?
Ping.
--
Thanks, K
Hello,
On 06 Nov 10:27, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> Hello,
> This patch introduces sae-only feature for
> structureless expands.
>
> Bootstrapped.
>
> Is it ok for trunk?
Ping.
--
Thanks, K
Hello,
On 12 Nov 15:36, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> Hello,
> Patch in the bottom extends some hooks toward AVX-512 support.
> This patch decrease icount for Spec2006 FP suite (ref set):
>
> Optset was: -static -m64 -fstrict-aliasing -fno-prefetch-loop-arrays
> -Ofast -funroll-loops
On 16 Nov 10:03, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > As far as I understand semantics of this insn:
> > (insn 200 199 0 (set (reg:DI 15 r15)
> > (mem:DI (post_dec:DI (reg/f:DI 15 r15 [447])) [3
> > *_61[_12]{lb: 1 sz: 64}.text+8 S8 A64])) -1 (nil))
> > What is done is (in that sequence).
> > 1
Hello,
On 15 Nov 20:03, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> Ping?
Ping?
--
Thanks, K
Hello,
On 15 Nov 20:05, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> > Is it ok for trunk?
> Ping.
Ping.
--
Thanks, K
Hello,
On 15 Nov 20:06, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> Ping.
Ping.
--
Thanks, K
Adding back Richard.
On 19 Nov 12:07, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> Hello,
> On 15 Nov 20:05, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> > > Is it ok for trunk?
> > Ping.
> Ping.
>
> --
> Thanks, K
Hello,
On 15 Nov 20:08, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> > Is it ok for trunk?
> Ping.
Ping.
--
Thanks, K
Hello,
On 15 Nov 20:07, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> > Is it ok for trunk?
> Ping.
Ping.
--
Thanks, K
Hello,
On 15 Nov 20:09, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> > Is it ok for trunk?
> Ping.
Ping.
--
Thanks, K
Hello,
On 15 Nov 20:10, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> > Is it ok to commit to main trunk?
> Ping.
Ping.
--
Thanks, K
tability regressions without -mavx512f
option.
ChangeLog entry:
2013-11-18 Alexander Ivchenko
Maxim Kuznetsov
Sergey Lega
Anna Tikhonova
Ilya Tocar
Andrey Turetskiy
Ilya Verbin
Kirill Yukhin
On 19 Nov 15:36, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> Please also add new command options to g++.dg/other/sse-2.C and
> g++.dg/other/sse-3.C
>
> OK with the small nit below and with above testsute addition.
>
> No need to document negative option here.
Thanks! I'll fix your inputs and check in after rest is rev
roduce explicit predicated
versions of the insns and use their codes in the routine.
Test passes w/ patch applied and fails when not.
Bootstrap pass (for all languages).
ChangeLog entry:
2013-11-20 Kirill Yukhin
* config/ia64/ia64.md (prologue_allocate_stack): Block auto-
generatio
Hello Jakub,
On 03 Oct 16:39, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> --- gcc/config/i386/sse.md.jj 2014-09-26 10:33:18.0 +0200
> +++ gcc/config/i386/sse.md2014-10-03 15:03:44.170446452 +0200
> @@ -10386,7 +10386,8 @@ (define_mode_iterator VEC_PERM_CONST
> (V8SI "TARGET_AVX") (V4DI "TARGET_AVX")
>
Hello,
This patch extends permutations for AVX-512*.
Comments are welcome!
Bootstrapped.
AVX-512* tests on top of patch-set all pass
under simulator.
Is it ok for trunk?
gcc/
* config/i386/i386.c
(ix86_expand_vec_perm_vpermi2): Handle V64QImode, V8HImode, V16HImode,
V32HI
Hello Jakub,
On 07 Oct 21:40, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 10:12:22PM +0400, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> OT, from the various IRC discussions with Kirill on IRC, it seems you or
> your colleges typed pretty much all target related tests from OpenMP 4.0.1
> examples, can those be also sub
On 08 Oct 23:02, Petr Murzin wrote:
> Hi,
> I have measured performance impact on Haswell platform according to this
> input:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-06/msg00978.html
Same in plain text:
For `-O2':
TestPrevious Current Ratio(%)
400.perlbench 46.2000 46.2000 +0%
401.b
Hello,
This patch adds rest of vpack instruction patterns.
Bootstrapped.
gcc.target/i386.exp tests on top of patch-set show no regressions.
under simulator.
Is it ok for trunk?
gcc/
* config/i386/sse.md
(define_insn "_packsswb"): Add masking.
(define_insn "_packuswb"): Di
Hello,
This tiny patch extend mul insn pattern to support
masking.
Bootstrapped.
AVX-512* tests on top of patch-set all pass
under simulator.
Is it ok for trunk?
gcc/
* config/i386/sse.md
(define_expand "mul3"): Add masking.
--
Thanks, K
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/sse.md b/gc
Hello,
This patch extends vpalignr insn patterns.
It also introduces dedicated `masked' version of pattern
w/o substing.
Bootstrapped.
AVX-512* tests on top of patch-set all pass
under simulator.
Is it ok for trunk?
gcc/
* config/i386/sse.md
(define_mode_iterator SSESCALARMODE):
Hello,
This tiny patch updates constraints in vec_dup insn
pattern.
Bootstrapped.
AVX-512* tests on top of patch-set all pass
under simulator.
Is it ok for trunk?
gcc/
* config/i386/sse.md
(define_insn "vec_dup"): Update constraints.
--
Thanks, K
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/ss
Hello,
This patch extends vpmullw, vpacksdw and pmaddwd
insn patterns.
Bootstrapped.
AVX-512* tests on top of patch-set all pass
under simulator.
Is it ok for trunk?
gcc/
* config/i386/sse.md
(define_c_enum "unspec"): Add UNSPEC_PMADDWD512.
(define_mode_iterator VI2_AVX2)
On 09 Oct 15:07, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> +(define_insn "*mul3"
> + [(set (match_operand:VI2_AVX2 0 "register_operand" "=x,v")
> + (mult:VI2_AVX2 (match_operand:VI2_AVX2 1 "nonimmediate_operand" "%0,v")
> +
Hello,
This patch adds support for vpmulhrsw insn.
Bootstrapped.
AVX-512* tests on top of patch-set all pass
under simulator.
Is it ok for trunk?
gcc/
* config/i386/sse.md
(define_insn "avx512bw_umulhrswv32hi3"): New.
(define_expand "_pmulhrsw3_mask"): Ditto.
--
Thanks,
Hello,
This patch further extends maxmin patterns.
Bootstrapped.
AVX-512* tests on top of patch-set all pass
under simulator.
Is it ok for trunk?
gcc/
* config/i386/sse.md
(define_insn "*3_finite"):
Fix pattern conditions order.
(define_insn "*sse4_1_3"): Add mask
Hello,
This obvious patch removes redundant iterator attribute
Bootstrapped.
Is it ok for trunk?
gcc/
* config/i386/sse.md (define_mode_attr avx2_avx512f): Remove.
--
Thanks, K
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/sse.md b/gcc/config/i386/sse.md
index a833cd9..cf415c3 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i3
Hello,
This patch extends VI mode iterator.
Bootstrapped.
AVX-512* tests on top of patch-set all pass
under simulator.
Is it ok for trunk?
gcc/
* config/i386/i386.c
(ix86_expand_vector_logical_operator): Handle V16SF and V8DF modes.
* config/i386/sse.md
(define_mo
Hello,
This patch extends pattern for reducation maxmin autogen.
Bootstrapped.
AVX-512* tests on top of patch-set all pass
under simulator.
Is it ok for trunk?
gcc/
* config/i386/sse.md
(define_mode_iterator REDUC_SMINMAX_MODE): Add V64QI and V32HI modes.
--
Thanks, K
diff --gi
Hello,
Bootstrapped.
AVX-512* tests on top of patch-set all pass
under simulator.
Is it ok for trunk?
gcc/
* config/i386/i386.c
(emit_reduc_half): Handle V64QI and V32HI mode.
* config/i386/sse.md
(define_mode_iterator VI_AVX512BW): New.
(define_expand "re
Hello,
This patch extends vec_init-related routines/patterns.
Bootstrapped.
AVX-512* tests on top of patch-set all pass
under simulator.
Is it ok for trunk?
gcc/
* config/i386/i386.c
(ix86_expand_vector_init_duplicate): Handle V64QI and V32HI modes,
update V8HI, V16QI, V3
Hello,
This patch extends autogeneration of SI-2-SF
conversions.
Bootstrapped.
AVX-512* tests on top of patch-set all pass
under simulator.
Is it ok for trunk?
gcc/
* config/i386/i386.c
(ix86_expand_vector_convert_uns_vsivsf): Handle V16SI mode and
TARGET_AVX512VL.
--
Th
Hello,
This patch extends movcc/vcond autogen.
Bootstrapped.
AVX-512* tests on top of patch-set all pass
under simulator.
Is it ok for trunk?
gcc/
* config/i386/i386.c
(ix86_expand_sse_movcc): Handle V64QI and V32HI mode.
(ix86_expand_int_vcond): Ditto.
--
Thanks, K
dif
Hello folks,
On 09 Oct 14:57, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 2:28 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
> > On Thu, 9 Oct 2014, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> OK, let's go in the proposed way, more detailed:
>
> - we begin with +-*/ of float/double vectors. IMO, this would result
> in a relatively small and
Hello Uroš,
It seems like I missed to post uppdated patch.
On 25 Sep 20:11, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> I'd rather go with the second approach, it is less confusing from the
> maintainer POV. All other patterns with masking use some consistent
> template, so I'd suggest using the same approach for everyth
Hello Uroš,
On 09 Oct 18:05, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> > diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
> > index 7c34431..8a7853e 100644
> > --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
> > +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.
Hello,
This patch extends insertion hook.
AVX-512* tests on top of patch-set all pass
under simulator.
gcc/
* config/i386/i386.c
(ix86_expand_vector_set): Handle V8DF, V8DI, V16SF, V16SI, V32HI, V64QI
modes.
--
Thanks, K
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/
Hello,
This patch extends expand_mul_widen_hilo to 512-bit QI,SI,HI modes.
Bootstrapped and regtested
gcc/
* config/i386/i386.c
(ix86_expand_mul_widen_hilo): Handle V32HI, V16SI, V64QI modes.
Is it ok for trunk?
--
Thanks, K
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/i386
Hello,
This patch extends expand_sse2_mulvxdi3.
Bootstrapped.
AVX-512* tests on top of patch-set all pass
under simulator.
Is it ok for trunk?
gcc/
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_expand_sse2_mulvxdi3): Extend
expand_sse2_mulvxdi3.
--
Thanks, K
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/
Hello Jakub,
On 15 Oct 18:23, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 04:13:25PM +0400, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> > --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
> > +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
> > @@ -39821,6 +39823,9 @@ ix86_expand_vector_init_duplicate (bool mmx_ok,
>
Hello Uroš,
On 16 Oct 14:29, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> > + if (mode == V4DImode)
> > + emit_insn (gen_avx512dq_mulv4di3 (op0, op1, op2));
> > + else if (mode == V2DImode)
> > + emit_insn (gen_avx512dq_mulv4di3 (op0, op1, op2));
>
> Should this be v2di ?
Right, copy-a
Hello,
This is fix for bootstrap failure.
Is it OK?
gcc/
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_expand_sse2_mulvxdi3): Refactor
conditions to fix bootstrap.
--
Thanks, K
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
index 7040200..3ddaf3d 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
+
Hello,
On 20 Oct 14:36, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 11:18:28AM +0400, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> > * config/i386/sse.md (define_mode_iterator VI_AVX2): Extend
> > to support AVX-512BW.
> > (define_mode_iterator VI124_AVX2_48_AVX512F): Remove.
>
Hello,
On 21 Oct 11:17, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 05:41:25PM +0400, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >> This patch adds (almost) all built-ins needed by
> >> AVX-512VL,BW,DQ int
On 21 Oct 16:20, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 06:08:15PM +0400, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> > --- a/gcc/tree.h
> > +++ b/gcc/tree.h
> > @@ -2334,6 +2334,10 @@ extern void decl_value_expr_insert (tree, tree);
> > #define DECL_COMDAT(NODE) \
> &
On 21 Oct 18:47, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> On 21 Oct 16:20, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 06:08:15PM +0400, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> > > --- a/gcc/tree.h
> > > +++ b/gcc/tree.h
> > > @@ -2334,6 +2334,10 @@ extern void decl_value_expr_insert (tre
Hello,
Patch was separated into two parts: tree-core.h changes and target
changes.
On 21 Oct 16:20, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 06:08:15PM +0400, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> > --- a/gcc/tree.h
> > +++ b/gcc/tree.h
> > @@ -2334,6 +2334,10 @@ extern void decl_va
Hello,
On 22 Oct 10:09, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Kirill Yukhin
> wrote:
> > On 21 Oct 18:47, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> >> On 21 Oct 16:20, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 06:08:15PM +0400, Kirill Yukhin
Hello,
This patch introduces built-ins for gather insns.
Bootstrapped.
AVX-512* tests on top of patch-set all pass
under simulator.
Is it ok for trunk?
gcc/
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_builtins): Add IX86_BUILTIN_GATHER3ALTSIV4DF,
IX86_BUILTIN_GATHER3ALTDIV8SF, IX86_BUILTIN_GATHER
Hello,
This patch adds built-ins for scatter insns.
Bootstrapped.
AVX-512* tests on top of patch-set all pass
under simulator.
Is it ok for trunk?
gcc/
* config/i386/i386.c
(ix86_init_mmx_sse_builtins):
Define __builtin_ia32_gather3siv2df, __builtin_ia32_gather3siv4df,
Hello,
This tiny patch adds couple of missing immediate checks.
Bootstrapped.
AVX-512* tests on top of patch-set all pass
under simulator.
Is it ok for trunk?
gcc/
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_expand_args_builtin): Handle
avx_vpermilv4df_mask, avx_shufpd256_mask, avx_vpermilv2df_ma
Hello,
This patch extends sse-* and avx-* tests
which checks immediates/options.
Bootstrapped.
AVX-512* tests on top of patch-set all pass
under simulator.
Is it ok for trunk?
gcc/
* testsuite/g++.dg/other/i386-2.C: Add new options.
* testsuite/g++.dg/other/i386-3.C: Ditto.
Hello,
This patch introduces necessary AVX-512* intrinsics headers.
Bootstrapped.
AVX-512* tests on top of patch-set all pass
under simulator.
Is it ok for trunk?
gcc/
* config/i386/avx512bwintrin.h: New.
* config/i386/avx512dqintrin.h: Ditto.
* config/i386/avx512vlbwintr
Hello,
This patch adds tests for new intrinsics.
Bootstrapped.
AVX-512* tests on top of patch-set all pass
under simulator.
Is it ok for trunk?
gcc/
* testsuite/gcc.target/i386/avx512bw-check.h: New.
* testsuite/gcc.target/i386/avx512bw-kunpckdq-1.c: Ditto.
* testsuite/gc
Hello,
This patch introduces rest of intrinsics (compare).
Bootstrapped.
AVX-512* tests on top of patch-set all pass
under simulator.
Is it ok for trunk?
gcc/
* config/i386/avx512bwintrin.h: Add new intrinsics.
* config/i386/avx512vlbwintrin.h: Ditto.
* config/i386/avx512
Hello,
This patch fixes kmov* insn generation
and adds memory alternative to `movqi_internal'
pattern
Reg-test included.
Bootstrapped.
AVX-512* tests on top of patch-set all pass
under simulator.
Is it ok for trunk?
gcc/
* config/i386/i386.md (movhi_internal): Always detect mskmov.
On 22 Oct 16:48, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> Hello,
> This patch adds tests for new intrinsics.
>
> Bootstrapped.
> AVX-512* tests on top of patch-set all pass
> under simulator.
>
> Is it ok for trunk?
>
> gcc/
> * testsuite/gcc.target/i386/avx512bw-check.h:
On 22 Oct 16:37, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> gcc/
> * testsuite/g++.dg/other/i386-2.C: Add new options.
Please, disregard "testsuite/gcc.target" in overall ChangeLog entry.
--
Thanks, K
On 22 Oct 16:51, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> gcc/
> * testsuite/gcc.target/i386/avx512bw-vpcmpequb-1.c: New.
Please, disregard "testsuite/" in overall ChangeLog entry.
--
Thanks, K
Hello Uroš,
On 08 Jun 11:26, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Petr Murzin wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I've fixed tests for AVX512, so they could be compiled with -Werror
> > -Wall. Please have a look.
> From a quick look, this looks OK.
Thanks, checked into trunk.
Could we apply that
Hello,
I would like to announce creation of a dedicated branch gomp4-offload to speed
up review of FE-independent offload-related features.
This branch includes:
- set of necessary patches from gomp4 branch
- set of patches which we were developed internally and were unable to
share
Hello,
I would like to announce creation of a dedicated branch gomp4-offload to speed
up review of FE-independent offload-related features.
This branch includes:
- set of necessary patches from gomp4 branch
- set of patches which we were developed internally and were unable to
share
301 - 400 of 829 matches
Mail list logo
