Hello,
This patch introduces integer max/min AVX-512 pattern.
Bootstrapped.
AVX-512* tests on top of patch-set all pass
under simulator.
Is it ok for trunk?
gcc/
* config/i386/sse.md
(define_mode_iterator VI128_256): New.
(define_insn "<mask_codefor><code><mode>3<mask_name>"): Ditto.
--
Thanks, K
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/sse.md b/gcc/config/i386/sse.md
index 5904450..6c99d84 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/sse.md
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/sse.md
@@ -281,6 +281,9 @@
(define_mode_iterator VI8_256_512
[V8DI (V4DI "TARGET_AVX512VL")])
+(define_mode_iterator VI128_256
+ [V4DI V2DI V4SI (V16QI "TARGET_AVX512BW") (V8HI "TARGET_AVX512BW")])
+
(define_mode_iterator VI1_AVX2
[(V32QI "TARGET_AVX2") V16QI])
@@ -8922,6 +8925,17 @@
(set_attr "prefix" "maybe_evex")
(set_attr "mode" "OI")])
+(define_insn "<mask_codefor><code><mode>3<mask_name>"
+ [(set (match_operand:VI128_256 0 "register_operand" "=v")
+ (maxmin:VI128_256
+ (match_operand:VI128_256 1 "register_operand" "v")
+ (match_operand:VI128_256 2 "nonimmediate_operand" "vm")))]
+ "TARGET_AVX512VL"
+ "vp<maxmin_int><ssemodesuffix>\t{%2, %1,
%0<mask_operand3>|%0<mask_operand3>, %1, %2}"
+ [(set_attr "type" "sseiadd")
+ (set_attr "prefix" "evex")
+ (set_attr "mode" "<sseinsnmode>")])
+
(define_expand "<code><mode>3"
[(set (match_operand:VI8_AVX2 0 "register_operand")
(maxmin:VI8_AVX2
