On Fri, 2 Jun 2023 at 16:45, Joseph Faulls wrote:
> It is not required that codecvt facet be
> supported by
>
> the locale, nor is it added as part of the default locale. This can lead to
>
> dangerous behaviour when static_cast.
>
Ouch, yes indeed. I don't know why I added that there. Thanks for
Since Jonathan approved the library change, I'm looking for middle-end
approval for the tree-eh change, even without advice on the potential
follow-up.
On 5/24/23 14:55, Jason Merrill wrote:
Middle-end folks: any thoughts about how best to make the change described in
the last paragraph below?
Enable lock-free 128-bit atomics on AArch64. This is backwards compatible with
existing binaries, gives better performance than locking atomics and is what
most users expect.
Note 128-bit atomic loads use a load/store exclusive loop if LSE2 is not
supported.
This results in an implicit store wh
Dear all,
I've committed that attached simple patch on behalf of Steve
after discussion in the PR and regtesting on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
It fixes a duplicate error message and an ICE.
Pushed as r14-1505-gfae09dfc0e6bf4cfe35d817558827aea78c6426f .
Thanks,
Harald
From fae09dfc0e6bf4cfe35d8175588
@David: I am not sure what sets the ABI on AIX (for Darwin, it is effectively
"whatever the system compiler [Apple gcc-4] does") but from an inspection of
the code, it seems that (if the platform should honour #pragma pack) a similar
effect could be present there too.
Tested on powerpc-apple-darwi
On 6/2/23 03:33, juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai wrote:
From: Juzhe-Zhong
Notice there is warning in predicates.md:
../../../riscv-gcc/gcc/config/riscv/predicates.md: In function ‘bool
arith_operand_or_mode_mask(rtx, machine_mode)’:
../../../riscv-gcc/gcc/config/riscv/predicates.md:33:14: warning:
On 6/2/23 09:00, Thomas Neumann via Gcc-patches wrote:
Summary: The radix sort did not handle the uppermost byte correctly,
which sometimes broke win32 exceptions. Bugzilla #109670. The reporter
confirmed that the patch fixes the bug.
See:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-May/
On 6/2/23 08:54, Thomas Neumann wrote:
Summary: The old linear scan logic called free while searching the list
of frames. The atomic fast path finds the frame quickly, but forgot the
free call. This patches adds the missing free. Bugzilla #109685.
See:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patc
Lgtm, thanks:)
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai 於 2023年6月2日 週五 15:20 寫道：
> Thanks. I am gonna wait for Jeff or Kito final approve.
>
> --
> juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
>
>
> *From:* Robin Dapp
> *Date:* 2023-06-02 15:18
> *To:* juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai; gcc-patches
> *CC:* rdapp.gcc ; kit
Committed, with Robin's suggestion for commit log, thanks Robin and Kito.
Pan
-Original Message-
From: Gcc-patches On Behalf
Of Kito Cheng via Gcc-patches
Sent: Saturday, June 3, 2023 9:10 AM
To: 钟居哲
Cc: Robin Dapp ; gcc-patches ;
kito.cheng ; palmer ; palmer
; jeffreyalaw
Subject:
Committed, thanks Jeff.
Pan
-Original Message-
From: Gcc-patches On Behalf
Of Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
Sent: Saturday, June 3, 2023 4:57 AM
To: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: kito.ch...@gmail.com; kito.ch...@sifive.com; pal...@dabbelt.com;
pal...@rivosinc.com; rdapp.
On 6/2/23 01:07, yanzhang.wang--- via Gcc-patches wrote:
From: Yanzhang Wang
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/riscv/riscv.cc (riscv_save_reg_p): Save ra for leaf
when enabling -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer
(riscv_option_override): Override omit-frame-pointer.
(riscv_
Hi David,
The new test ICEs the compiler on aarch64-linux-gnu [1]. Would you please
investigate?
Running gcc:gcc.dg/analyzer/analyzer.exp ...
FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/atomic-builtins-qemu-sockets.c (internal compiler error:
in validate, at analyzer/store.cc:1329)
FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/atomic-buil
Hi Harald,
It looks good to me. Thanks to you and Steve for the fix. I suggest
that it is such and obvious one that it deserved back-porting.
Cheers
Paul
On Fri, 2 Jun 2023 at 19:06, Harald Anlauf via Fortran
wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I've committed that attached simple patch on behalf of Steve
Hi Paul,
I propose to backport
r13-6747-gd7caf313525a46f200d7f5db1ba893f853774aee to 12-branch very
soon.
Is this something that we usually do?
While finalization was basically broken before, some people still used
working subsets (or subsets that were broken, and they adapted or
wrote their
101 - 115 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
