Richard Henderson writes:
> On 06/01/2011 07:51 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
>> + /* Set PC to the instruction after the faulting one to skip over it,
>> + otherwise we enter an infinite loop. 4 is the size of the stmxcsr
>> + instruction. */
> ...
>> + /* We need a single SSE instructi
On 06/01/2011 10:29 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
> I still mean to fix
> driver-i386.c to correcly handle -march=native on Solaris 8 and 9 which
> cannot in general execute SSE insns. I wonder if there's a better place
> to share this code?
I can't think of a good place. :-(
r~
Richard Henderson writes:
> On 06/01/2011 07:51 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
>> + /* Set PC to the instruction after the faulting one to skip over it,
>> + otherwise we enter an infinite loop. 4 is the size of the stmxcsr
>> + instruction. */
> ...
>> + /* We need a single SSE instructi
On 06/01/2011 07:51 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
> + /* Set PC to the instruction after the faulting one to skip over it,
> + otherwise we enter an infinite loop. 4 is the size of the stmxcsr
> + instruction. */
...
> + /* We need a single SSE instruction here so the handler can safely sk
Uros Bizjak writes:
> Please just put "if (edx & bit_SSE)" part inside existing check. You
> will need to split assignment of mxcsr from the declaration, though.
>
> OK with this change.
Here's the patch I've actually comitted after a quick bootstrap on
i386-pc-solaris2.10.
Thanks.
Rain
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Rainer Orth
wrote:
> The only complication is that I need to make sure that SSE insns are only
> used if the host supports them.
>
> Bootstrapped without regressions on i386-pc-solaris2.8,
> i386-pc-solaris2.9, i386-pc-solaris2.11, and sparc-sun-solaris2.11.
>
> T
I had long meant to support -fast-math on Solaris 2/x86. While working
on the Solaris toplevel libgcc move, I've done it with the following
patch.
The only complication is that I need to make sure that SSE insns are only
used if the host supports them.
Bootstrapped without regressions on i386-pc
