Re: Trait built-in naming convention

2024-05-02 Thread Ken Matsui
On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 1:09 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 12:52:59PM -0700, Ken Matsui wrote: > > > This seems to be the prevailing sentiment, so let's continue that way. > > > Thanks for the input. > > > > I actually found that we have two built-in type traits prefixed with

Re: Trait built-in naming convention

2024-05-02 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 12:52:59PM -0700, Ken Matsui wrote: > > This seems to be the prevailing sentiment, so let's continue that way. > > Thanks for the input. > > I actually found that we have two built-in type traits prefixed with > __builtin: __builtin_is_corresponding_member and That is a FE

Re: Trait built-in naming convention

2024-05-02 Thread Ken Matsui
On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 12:49 PM Jason Merrill wrote: > > On 5/2/24 15:36, Iain Sandoe wrote: > > > > > >> On 2 May 2024, at 20:30, Ken Matsui wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 10:54 AM Marek Polacek wrote: > >>> > >>> On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 08:37:53PM +0300, Ville Voutilainen wrote: > >>>

Re: Trait built-in naming convention

2024-05-02 Thread Jason Merrill
On 5/2/24 15:36, Iain Sandoe wrote: On 2 May 2024, at 20:30, Ken Matsui wrote: On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 10:54 AM Marek Polacek wrote: On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 08:37:53PM +0300, Ville Voutilainen wrote: On Thu, 2 May 2024 at 20:25, Ken Matsui wrote: There was some discussion of how to name

Re: Trait built-in naming convention

2024-05-02 Thread Iain Sandoe
> On 2 May 2024, at 20:30, Ken Matsui wrote: > > On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 10:54 AM Marek Polacek wrote: >> >> On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 08:37:53PM +0300, Ville Voutilainen wrote: >>> On Thu, 2 May 2024 at 20:25, Ken Matsui wrote: > There was some discussion of how to name the built-ins back

Re: Trait built-in naming convention

2024-05-02 Thread Ken Matsui
On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 10:54 AM Marek Polacek wrote: > > On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 08:37:53PM +0300, Ville Voutilainen wrote: > > On Thu, 2 May 2024 at 20:25, Ken Matsui wrote: > > > > There was some discussion of how to name the built-ins back in > > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2

Re: Trait built-in naming convention

2024-05-02 Thread Ken Matsui
On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 12:18 PM Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Thu, 2 May 2024 at 18:38, Ville Voutilainen > wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2 May 2024 at 20:25, Ken Matsui wrote: > > > > There was some discussion of how to name the built-ins back in > > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2007-

Re: Trait built-in naming convention

2024-05-02 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On Thu, 2 May 2024 at 18:38, Ville Voutilainen wrote: > > On Thu, 2 May 2024 at 20:25, Ken Matsui wrote: > > > There was some discussion of how to name the built-ins back in > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2007-March/thread.html#212171 > > > but __builtin wasn't discussed. > > > >

Re: Trait built-in naming convention

2024-05-02 Thread Ville Voutilainen
On Thu, 2 May 2024 at 20:25, Ken Matsui wrote: > > There was some discussion of how to name the built-ins back in > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2007-March/thread.html#212171 > > but __builtin wasn't discussed. > > > > Apparently this naming convention follows the MSVC precedent: >

Re: Trait built-in naming convention

2024-05-02 Thread Ken Matsui
On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 10:12 AM Jason Merrill wrote: > > On 5/2/24 12:45, Jason Merrill wrote: > > On 5/2/24 12:20, Ken Matsui wrote: > >> On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 8:34 AM Ken Matsui > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 8:16 AM Patrick Palka wrote: > > On Tue, 30 Apr 2024, Jaso