On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 1:09 PM Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 12:52:59PM -0700, Ken Matsui wrote: > > > This seems to be the prevailing sentiment, so let's continue that way. > > > Thanks for the input. > > > > I actually found that we have two built-in type traits prefixed with > > __builtin: __builtin_is_corresponding_member and > > That is a FE builtin, not a trait, and is very much different from the > __is_* traits, is varargs with extra processing, I don't think any of > the normal traits accepts pointer to members. > > > __builtin_is_pointer_interconvertible_with_class. Do we want to > > update these to use __ instead for consistency? > > No, I think we want to keep them as is.
I see. Thank you. > > Jakub >
