On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 12:52:59PM -0700, Ken Matsui wrote:
> > This seems to be the prevailing sentiment, so let's continue that way.
> > Thanks for the input.
>
> I actually found that we have two built-in type traits prefixed with
> __builtin: __builtin_is_corresponding_member and
That is a FE builtin, not a trait, and is very much different from the
__is_* traits, is varargs with extra processing, I don't think any of
the normal traits accepts pointer to members.
> __builtin_is_pointer_interconvertible_with_class. Do we want to
> update these to use __ instead for consistency?
No, I think we want to keep them as is.
Jakub
