yes -- there is no need to change any developer only internal names.
David
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 08:48:10AM -0700, Xinliang David Li wrote:
>> Yes.
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 5:35 AM, Diego Novillo wrote:
>> > On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 08:48:10AM -0700, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> Yes.
>
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 5:35 AM, Diego Novillo wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 4:40 AM, Kostya Serebryany wrote:
> >> One thing I overlooked before.
> >> In the gcc patch we are using -fasan flag name, while clang u
Yes.
David
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 5:35 AM, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 4:40 AM, Kostya Serebryany wrote:
>> One thing I overlooked before.
>> In the gcc patch we are using -fasan flag name, while clang uses
>> -f[no-]address-sanitizer
>> (it used to be -fasan in early patche
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 4:40 AM, Kostya Serebryany wrote:
> One thing I overlooked before.
> In the gcc patch we are using -fasan flag name, while clang uses
> -f[no-]address-sanitizer
> (it used to be -fasan in early patches, but was renamed before submitting to
> trunk).
> Do we want to be flag-
On 2012-10-10 16:52 , Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
* tree-asan.c: New file.
* tree-asan.h: New file.
Nit: do we still need the "tree-" prefix? IMHO not.
Richard Biener s
On 2012-10-10 16:48 , Steven Bosscher wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
* tree-asan.c: New file.
* tree-asan.h: New file.
Nit: do we still need the "tree-" prefix? IMHO not.
Good point. I'll rename them to asan.[ch].
Diego.
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 11:00 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
>> Is there an agreed way for file naming?
>
> It was not my intent to start a bike shed discussion. This was just
> something I've been wondering for some time. But AFAIC it's up t
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 11:00 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> Is there an agreed way for file naming?
It was not my intent to start a bike shed discussion. This was just
something I've been wondering for some time. But AFAIC it's up to
Diego&co to do what they think is right :-)
Ciao!
Steven
Is there an agreed way for file naming?
David
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
>> * tree-asan.c: New file.
>> * tree-asan.h: New file.
>
> Nit: do we still need the "tree-" prefix? IMHO not.
>
> Ciao!
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
>> * tree-asan.c: New file.
>> * tree-asan.h: New file.
>
> Nit: do we still need the "tree-" prefix? IMHO not.
Richard Biener suggested we use gimple- as the prefix fo
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
> * tree-asan.c: New file.
> * tree-asan.h: New file.
Nit: do we still need the "tree-" prefix? IMHO not.
Ciao!
Steven
On 2012-10-10 16:21 , Diego Novillo wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
I have created a temporary branch to host the port of ASAN to
trunk. Wei has done the initial port of the original code from
Kostya. It compiles but we still do not have the runtimes (Wei
is worki
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
> I have created a temporary branch to host the port of ASAN to
> trunk. Wei has done the initial port of the original code from
> Kostya. It compiles but we still do not have the runtimes (Wei
> is working on that).
The branch is in svn://g
13 matches
Mail list logo
